Re: [dispatch] I-D Action: draft-pd-dispatch-msrp-websocket-03.txt

Sergio Garcia Murillo <sergio.garcia.murillo@gmail.com> Thu, 13 February 2014 21:47 UTC

Return-Path: <sergio.garcia.murillo@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00CA71A007F for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 13:47:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hZ2GJ3wNu7Se for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 13:47:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-we0-x22c.google.com (mail-we0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22c]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E2031A00C3 for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 13:47:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-we0-f172.google.com with SMTP id p61so8231054wes.17 for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 13:47:15 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=929l0KRUJfDNv3wqzoVyCCJGzbkR/5srw5ogBtal6JI=; b=EbmnVaVM2/mBUlzz19Aq4AFRTqhrGppCNopq7P1PxWVvciAX57t9nVfT4W+X6njlYX mAXPCO/4vpVvbYG6y3wBRFYSFixNiHkm5KY+pubZ4xCiH2yXIE/5nyOLwZ6RtsldrG+p G82iumafdGM6GguJ4NvUiWXRbUN/xdTynphiQ56IJRCofNjKOH5AUlvUDRZpGz6GUuhj 63et2KUxuV6Tej7pcQEigD6lNRI8SB2X1Qwx+296sAQi3m6wtV9xbmwS4onsfcfudwZc j5nfFT7mtWgt4Nr9WJea2zVNYbUz0V7dJJ+OgdDSiD9TcVtQAn19dHTBmMl3JrziNV7f Xftg==
X-Received: by 10.180.105.41 with SMTP id gj9mr8185732wib.28.1392328035517; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 13:47:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.192] ([95.61.111.78]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id d6sm16929720wic.9.2014.02.13.13.47.13 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 13 Feb 2014 13:47:14 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <52FD3D61.2020901@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 22:47:13 +0100
From: Sergio Garcia Murillo <sergio.garcia.murillo@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Peter Dunkley <peter.dunkley@crocodilertc.net>
References: <20131213005747.777.34301.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAHBDyN4tSRO_nYy7_-V4xfmDbF0ZeLJ24_fEOQ1p9Z2BvJyinQ@mail.gmail.com> <97B47463-42D2-4BA9-AC2F-DF8C67702DDC@cisco.com> <52FCE70C.1030608@gmail.com> <CAHBDyN7hySvbiJYnvRXDQ2ZS_FYFDMaODXBDRarE6DhRwC=fHQ@mail.gmail.com> <CA+ag07bPBHzODTWGKFrKE00nO_wiMgRv2GEwUpGCiH25-Xf2Cw@mail.gmail.com> <CAEqTk6Reb=29kxeOUyPxAnhkRGqORHRoUchz5=hE4UNMggDnag@mail.gmail.com> <52FD36A3.1020606@gmail.com> <CAEqTk6R1bEG2=fr70zLXLC2MxC11b7ekHqZP4S8L_0s+v83DDw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAEqTk6R1bEG2=fr70zLXLC2MxC11b7ekHqZP4S8L_0s+v83DDw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dispatch/ZaVOriIgRUcbC5lXkfWXOQ04J2s
Cc: DISPATCH <dispatch@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dispatch] I-D Action: draft-pd-dispatch-msrp-websocket-03.txt
X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 21:47:22 -0000

El 13/02/2014 22:24, Peter Dunkley escribió:
> Hello,
>
> Because WebSockets is an asynchronous protocol two MSRP peers (that 
> are clients) cannot use MSRP over WebSockets.
>
> It could be possible for a WebSocket server to be an MSRP peer (for 
> example, in the scenario where the server is B2B'ing MSRP like an SBC 
> will do in IMS for CEMA).  Christer Holmberg has expressed an interest 
> in this scenario and may provide language relating to it for the draft 
> - but for now this is out of the scope of the draft which explicitly 
> deals just with with the MSRP through relay scenario.  If Christer 
> does provide some additional language then the draft will cover this 
> without relay scenario, but if not nothing in the draft should prevent 
> someone from addressing it in the future with an additional document 
> (should there be interest).
>
> From my point-of-view I am only interested in the with relay scenario 
> at this time.

Fair enough, but then maybe the draft should be named "MSRP over 
webscokets via MSRP relay" to avoid confusions .. ;)

In that case, using the TCP/WS/MSRP wouldn't be correct in my point of 
view and the draft is ok as it is. I was thinking more in the scenario 
of the MSRP peer also been the Websocket server, that is very similar to 
the scenario we have in BFCP over websockets.

Best regards
Sergio