Re: [dispatch] Zstandard compression

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Thu, 14 December 2017 15:02 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34C4D126D3F for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Dec 2017 07:02:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=4rPvQppa; dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=XWJmT2sY
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id thvPIWgdjYjh for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Dec 2017 07:02:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 560E21293DF for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Dec 2017 07:02:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 72172 invoked from network); 14 Dec 2017 15:02:36 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=119ea.5a32928c.k1712; bh=6Vv8OUMCxjgjkj4mqLqF2qf/DwR9E2m4htdLWeL4H58=; b=4rPvQppacNHb5i6wQcnlQMArWoEqET7jVJbou0EwSFHEWZE+3noNbJEhdOyuVyc5VrG595w5bOWADMJPjsWecOOWG2B49C2GPdN8ky7afqFiGmP7XslPTks3mQO37D1vNMvfSLx4vNT/X3XTV5xlkFwMXuOwyTCkJtIZ5q7xsOisW7OOjrcxGMjV26VPIy565YPQ6cj3B7cVPfyam6v86Km6SPppMcfOo6YfmKKqHBeNrETtrikD/3YYOyUklN9e
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=119ea.5a32928c.k1712; bh=6Vv8OUMCxjgjkj4mqLqF2qf/DwR9E2m4htdLWeL4H58=; b=XWJmT2sYR9r8n4IM9L+Ht57/CsZy/cfFRlvHRUTWGGAypS0nPKFDvnKM3Rh17ChjIAeWwFWBhqFHA+HvaEexmdue2WNK/7u68Q56KB/7S02EGLroJIbWZ3YZUtXDaR7u2ZYrp1Rd7XHZKLlYEVZYmO1ImOXEb2UT0sO2OwLS6WnRFLa43JGgYC/8qT6uG2LzB+Bv1jNXkerBdwq2u+6QnSEa3pwBsxGAZp6LbvqCN+jVr7q1RbQjQRzP1hbnA367
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTP via TCP6; 14 Dec 2017 15:02:36 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id 7963C17F7274; Thu, 14 Dec 2017 10:02:35 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 10:02:35 -0500
Message-Id: <20171214150236.7963C17F7274@ary.qy>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dispatch@ietf.org
Cc: harald@alvestrand.no
In-Reply-To: <20c3e34b-a1f8-8aaa-81dd-88d8191d192c@alvestrand.no>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dispatch/cWUpuxWMqRHgOkQfWYkwXXNnbA4>
Subject: Re: [dispatch] Zstandard compression
X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 15:02:43 -0000

In article <20c3e34b-a1f8-8aaa-81dd-88d8191d192c@alvestrand.no> you write:
>Den 14. des. 2017 15:22, skrev Murray S. Kucherawy:
>>     mime-type: application/zstandard; contains="text/plain; charset=utf-8"

Ugh.

>No - it's been quite controversial the times (long ago) that it's been
>proposed.
>
>I think it was suggested for RFC 6713 (application/gzip), but it didn't
>survive the discussion. Probably that RFC should be taken as precedent.

As far as I recall It didn't come up for 6713 which whizzed through
and had a concrete use case of DMARC aggregate reports where everyone
knew that the contents were XML.

Perhaps it came up for RFCs 1950, 1951, and 1952 which describe the
underlying encoding.

R's,
John