Return-Path: <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dispatch@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: dispatch@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BEAE3D5340F;
	Thu,  3 Jul 2025 02:35:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5
	tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
	DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
	HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
	SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
	header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31])
	by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id K8MkomgTTNE4; Thu,  3 Jul 2025 02:35:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x536.google.com (mail-ed1-x536.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::536])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256)
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C4F23D533D7;
	Thu,  3 Jul 2025 02:35:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x536.google.com with SMTP id
 4fb4d7f45d1cf-6077dea37easo9533335a12.3;
        Thu, 03 Jul 2025 02:35:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1751535317; x=1752140117; darn=ietf.org;
        h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references
         :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
        bh=GYAMHbZvvtkW8LtVIOhxqWY1V3JHFbPHOEka8trR8fs=;
        b=UV6ZGto9QcddFyNM6BgjbNcPs8+eBLTmq/CPinwFv+m7D0R4SaacquGVkr4Q+ENSvY
         07djjSxx/A77WRVKvi7ypSOyng7Eb+1QLlOWY/dyLxX1G5/z8ZIiJtqbxnpP/2knjbL4
         TcDirb5QTi87iue0g+ZvaQJttuROF6YVIEbrctD8H1uBB8RSo8Dibvu9oKvhT/Yq2Ese
         EJme5ceD97BnAxC/60x+wUfKiHn6VdSA7/R9yS4PjJlgGITFHxz18H1mqTnuYAVR+9z9
         3npTOHQq7WnNxH/uSezcELmjh7D62KzWmKPcEdBaFrItTn+2sOAfiMXtmsn+R50w+iU8
         uasA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1751535317; x=1752140117;
        h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references
         :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id
         :reply-to;
        bh=GYAMHbZvvtkW8LtVIOhxqWY1V3JHFbPHOEka8trR8fs=;
        b=aKlQxqyxbAtECxvGc55rYXFsvhbHFd/eRQ7lbP/1uurALyRmiO3SR0oXmm9sQIDzNO
         7ngll20EG3tklgAZjUoZAEmq63S3cukuBIiu/QLA3ocy25zd9Fh8xJYmliXOXt9r1sRf
         yE0Voz07wGRCvmc/9jmT6khZOHXASVSXQT+C62FrN3IaEMHBW9BWgkVvKz61P6x1B+KP
         g1hXVkoAc4vZh0CFWgDJbpJqYww9ZS2yt6F00z3jBLaFKRzsC0QQEpOEhJs09D8sLqhj
         IMZ6HIW2lC815+5BgEB0Ik/DhSgpySp8VRZlRfVrpeTNDb9oFDBR2vnlOS4YWEcvx9Cn
         nAyA==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1;
 AJvYcCUbtuhhQiavuq7BcLY5uxqBo96Gg7wLERfjnXgLMubWWkT5FFpjhm1UBp+IK+x+KgxT0S8mVBZDtqKHhwX0VtE=@ietf.org,
 AJvYcCXwUL/S0Ncad83VIIPoAhVMm2cQ5W03zXsqUovAqFpDlTLwBGA68JTtO7wHt4dWTpPMJPFisZFKb3U=@ietf.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwtHFcLNDuoZiGqFZGlF80picjgJNhcKIHupDpbbH40tvQ1kaWV
	+g76LRyvFokPfpZLZkDxFCj6+kDOKLgYNXJdhF7sfpnr5CAPHIeJWOPA0r+IEKMVlCjv2Y14m33
	hVI0m1JWWAHEILbXhqrwoq2mtlD5kX7o=
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncuyBbn+9mBSFhRR080orrJcsyBeI/nwiyCJLvWdYYiF76avP/gvjHZIkclVQIW
	fX9rX3jf2pxSWBm84eWxCHpkzW0sBnNX6Z3WxWqu6Tqf+Skpg3H/IdNfy5Kh7qIYPHsPhOI2/GT
	4Y8iDyK/7Cjbj8EYzr0lQuQzP+WNrA2jkPbvnTBOfrMD2T
X-Google-Smtp-Source: 
 AGHT+IHoq6bOF+pGbTaXlNEWSPIMtPjvNpW8h1u2vnQlsqnvHEePP+ZkHgteOqjA6N1lE548xDmaQbAS32jzkYSzSEk=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:e843:b0:ae3:8c9b:bd6a with SMTP id
 a640c23a62f3a-ae3c2d94e3amr622041166b.40.1751535316703; Thu, 03 Jul 2025
 02:35:16 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <0fb1b438f095cd9288772754a2396b78@secroot.io>
In-Reply-To: <0fb1b438f095cd9288772754a2396b78@secroot.io>
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2025 10:34:50 +0100
X-Gm-Features: Ac12FXyn1Aa5b8s47BuQE-oRw1W_4-C3KkTRL1ENSQpW1RXRJ5Nzc25JTVj7e4k
Message-ID: 
 <CA+9kkMB22zbfHXrzC61GqbkrafsD8q33bxhZCL=Ba_dCnFqBQA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Rachid Bouziane <contact@secroot.io>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005d217a0639031897"
Message-ID-Hash: 34A5O44IW45XY7VNSKN6RXY66ELJC6FR
X-Message-ID-Hash: 34A5O44IW45XY7VNSKN6RXY66ELJC6FR
X-MailFrom: ted.ietf@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency;
 loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-dispatch.ietf.org-0;
 nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size;
 news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: Lucas Pardue <lucas@lucaspardue.com>, Dispatch <dispatch@ietf.org>,
 Dispatch Chairs <dispatch-chairs@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: =?utf-8?q?=5Bdispatch=5D_Re=3A_Proposal_for_New_Work=3A_OODA-HTTP_=E2=80=94_?=
	=?utf-8?q?Adaptive_Security_Framework_for_HTTP/HTTPS?=
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
Archived-At: 
 <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dispatch/eUMkLjkDucJPYYwWRGBqJANdsec>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dispatch>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:dispatch-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:dispatch-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dispatch-leave@ietf.org>

--0000000000005d217a0639031897
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Rachid,

Without comment on the broader proposal, may I draw your attention to RFC
6648: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6648.  This is a BCP
recommending against the use of X- headers and similar constructs.
Whatever the dispatch outcome, I suggest you consider its advice in updates
to your design.

best regards,

Ted Hardie

On Thu, Jul 3, 2025 at 2:45=E2=80=AFAM Rachid Bouziane <contact@secroot.io>=
 wrote:

> Thanks a lot for your question.
>
> DOTS focuses on signaling volumetric DDoS attacks to a mitigation
> server, typically via a dedicated control channel.
> OODA-HTTP, in contrast, introduces a behavioral layer directly inside
> HTTP/HTTPS to allow each HTTP request to carry lightweight telemetry
> (via the X-OODA-Action header), enabling real-time context-aware
> response at the edge (block, challenge, rotate TLS keys, etc.).
>
> It's more about individual behavioral defense (e.g. against bots,
> anomalous clients) than large-scale DDoS signaling.
> We see it as complementary to DOTS, acting inside the HTTP/TLS runtime,
> not outside.
>
> Happy to elaborate further if helpful.
>
> Best regards,
> Rachid Bouziane
> SecRoot.io =E2=80=94 OODA-HTTP Initiative
>
> _______________________________________________
> dispatch mailing list -- dispatch@ietf.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to dispatch-leave@ietf.org
>

--0000000000005d217a0639031897
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_default" style=3D"font-size:small">Hi =
Rachid,</div><div class=3D"gmail_default" style=3D"font-size:small"><br></d=
iv><div class=3D"gmail_default" style=3D"font-size:small">Without comment o=
n the broader proposal, may I draw your attention to RFC 6648:=C2=A0<a href=
=3D"https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6648">https://datatracker.ietf=
.org/doc/html/rfc6648</a>.=C2=A0 This is a BCP recommending against the use=
 of X- headers and similar constructs.=C2=A0 Whatever the dispatch outcome,=
 I suggest you consider its advice in updates to your design.</div><div cla=
ss=3D"gmail_default" style=3D"font-size:small"><br></div><div class=3D"gmai=
l_default" style=3D"font-size:small">best regards,</div><div class=3D"gmail=
_default" style=3D"font-size:small"><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_default" =
style=3D"font-size:small">Ted Hardie</div></div><br><div class=3D"gmail_quo=
te gmail_quote_container"><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On Thu, Jul=
 3, 2025 at 2:45=E2=80=AFAM Rachid Bouziane &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:contact@s=
ecroot.io">contact@secroot.io</a>&gt; wrote:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"=
gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(20=
4,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Thanks a lot for your question.<br>
<br>
DOTS focuses on signaling volumetric DDoS attacks to a mitigation <br>
server, typically via a dedicated control channel.<br>
OODA-HTTP, in contrast, introduces a behavioral layer directly inside <br>
HTTP/HTTPS to allow each HTTP request to carry lightweight telemetry <br>
(via the X-OODA-Action header), enabling real-time context-aware <br>
response at the edge (block, challenge, rotate TLS keys, etc.).<br>
<br>
It&#39;s more about individual behavioral defense (e.g. against bots, <br>
anomalous clients) than large-scale DDoS signaling.<br>
We see it as complementary to DOTS, acting inside the HTTP/TLS runtime, <br=
>
not outside.<br>
<br>
Happy to elaborate further if helpful.<br>
<br>
Best regards,<br>
Rachid Bouziane<br>
SecRoot.io =E2=80=94 OODA-HTTP Initiative<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
dispatch mailing list -- <a href=3D"mailto:dispatch@ietf.org" target=3D"_bl=
ank">dispatch@ietf.org</a><br>
To unsubscribe send an email to <a href=3D"mailto:dispatch-leave@ietf.org" =
target=3D"_blank">dispatch-leave@ietf.org</a><br>
</blockquote></div>

--0000000000005d217a0639031897--

