Re: [dispatch] [IANA #1176833] Last Call: <draft-hardie-dispatch-rfc3405-update-03.txt> (Updated registration rules for URI.ARPA) to Best Current Practice
Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Tue, 22 September 2020 21:07 UTC
Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61B873A19C3; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 14:07:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.402
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.402 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.248, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PfOqcRWlyG7P; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 14:07:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vs1-f44.google.com (mail-vs1-f44.google.com [209.85.217.44]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC1BA3A19CD; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 14:07:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vs1-f44.google.com with SMTP id j185so11155590vsc.3; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 14:07:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=2dFpwxdBInhOYrYvjrWXfmVDmR9/IuObdoEiUzxW/vo=; b=aIbVZL/K8EGA/n/Uw/IdpnN1Kic/xfDN9l8/HMOe6UAu/STYb059H3kzcS8tqWKSrX wO8ek9n8bFkHLk5piBV8BbNyEI0CCo3ucdal0Aebkr04r1fuqgCH9bIjzt4oMFbQf2Hw A3txvcXOhcop7J15+1V1/zvHWXMWdqP9teq39LFAEhhmkj68z2UssVPACW138XJEX3wE 2HSQR1vHDx/UjcWjaprn15AYnn625lXWcDNFhUi40nMChFFvfDaWFTWD9l3k7jBjexob Ylhw3K2LU7YiQcFqWzPRY3c9I0Rl75X6mjfpkzcxtTsqmV8LpAwD1SE2fbDXSDNqOEoc tUCQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530YunH+TwU4N31K0aneWWsUrUohDAdic6Hgz9ldQH4xg8rSJU4q o9Uf/5z+Nacv3+E+GIFearJD17mkN1i6WuGxI2U=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyFdnYDtAbGpBKkGObRCxCnfnOWQz2/TthgkyRMjgZOhS04+CvLpgeNC7XZtEoBokd6awSc+QznREkLyAeTMOY=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:8096:: with SMTP id b144mr3495156vsd.14.1600808836817; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 14:07:16 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <RT-Ticket-1176833@icann.org> <159855628289.21847.11968431519980055634@ietfa.amsl.com> <rt-4.4.3-32340-1600808137-357.1176833-37-0@icann.org>
In-Reply-To: <rt-4.4.3-32340-1600808137-357.1176833-37-0@icann.org>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 17:07:05 -0400
Message-ID: <CALaySJ+5oMWrPoGgrc3iPJkeMg0zCOZ=ocZWjk9Zv-=3VceWbA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Pearl Liang via RT <drafts-lastcall@iana.org>
Cc: IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>, Murray Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>, Spencer Dawkins <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>, DISPATCH <dispatch@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dispatch/et5jocr1fZN6mynBZVc6tupw7yI>
Subject: Re: [dispatch] [IANA #1176833] Last Call: <draft-hardie-dispatch-rfc3405-update-03.txt> (Updated registration rules for URI.ARPA) to Best Current Practice
X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 21:07:20 -0000
Hi, Sabrina, > IANA understands that [ RFC-to-be ] removes this normative requirement and that the new requirement is: > > "All registrations in URI.ARPA MUST now be for schemes which are permanent registrations, as they are described in BCP 35." Correct. > IANA Question --> RFC3405 is listed as the reference for the .uri.arpa zone. Upon approval of this document, > should this reference be replaced with [ RFC-to-be ] or should this document be added as an additional reference? Additional, please. Barry
- [dispatch] [IANA #1176833] Last Call: <draft-hard… Sabrina Tanamal via RT
- Re: [dispatch] [IANA #1176833] Last Call: <draft-… Barry Leiba
- Re: [dispatch] [IANA #1176833] Last Call: <draft-… Ted Hardie