[dispatch] Re: IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-dispatch-mime-protobuf
Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com> Wed, 16 July 2025 04:58 UTC
Return-Path: <tbray@textuality.com>
X-Original-To: dispatch@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: dispatch@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5481449818C for <dispatch@mail2.ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Jul 2025 21:58:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=textuality.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Wh5_tBZ6jSY6 for <dispatch@mail2.ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Jul 2025 21:58:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x62f.google.com (mail-pl1-x62f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62f]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 346444498185 for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Jul 2025 21:58:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x62f.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-23dea2e01e4so70079805ad.1 for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Jul 2025 21:58:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=textuality.com; s=google; t=1752641906; x=1753246706; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=46pW41KuNUNNaGsJdgkKEmGZ8yjH2TowCT2Yu0ygOa0=; b=O8pt25CJg2svRXtsxzOJrJZJkCbN0t31yh8cPHpBO+ZGBEJTDXOCzTcF7Wlbs9PnS2 /74iqRRRk/rN7UwBCLJ07faKEWWNyz4dMqJRXzTLtYiC0nUJQSPug2zgIR92JgTWvtRX ZTMwDGuet8LqMrfLdfAOcnCNUDn/t1GH7YSJc=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1752641906; x=1753246706; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=46pW41KuNUNNaGsJdgkKEmGZ8yjH2TowCT2Yu0ygOa0=; b=MXcCEy5U2gx0tw12YiYxCsALsINS1V+I4ugwJVDN4xfcNPyvdmdg+WHn8tX5DAkr3L 9C7I/xdXKShZ6FpCBi0GZ4RKC0qhNPqNGrqBMUjvfMMSmzlIl0uTA7QByCrH/dLtKsxh 4Z4aAdItdkjwqa/p/WEplpi0nZI+q7OQfegeo1N99Ma6+CxfeHFvayeFP+fLJ68/WkDl 7c5DfLwUtuXxdxUnvqj0T0Kbfed5+4pVc6wix108JtIsTruJbv6tMO6pb/laIj2e1R0a cfRknAq3ogyDyeIC9M5DHlrq+InWHDGMYghCf9H0NO5kd3r0NSN2oKbDMmQVPZN2EP72 Jfkw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzbPp6Gqggltcf62wshksT36lQRY3giqrKmoigwXoYB+x/wenqm Imh4iip191gnoh4/RfYkRLsYfCxRwqViyhX7hP1VtsqqHGzyLqiWnb+4bKd782RLeoRu9JAL3Pk I6OMfCZNUae6ybKk57tBIr6OT/XXcewxlVepX18RiVw==
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncvfsQHS+PVup707aOwSujWhY+xZUnNCWDG3CTMfdxcrbTTmjTHqtq33r9JTjE/ 2DJtatAkiaCbeq2goX8SEjDluqDQ8+xmI/mW7y8wTpec0gaMNvhbcibbokC+QnQvimf0rnI32X5 GDjoc15b5VnlnfY0lnyA5AUV1lLRjkAgD9HgMWXAZuBZVu7nbKqilfhJkBQi24la1KKL0taXMVK vi0ohglAnSk/++D
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IF8lKFXuywQd3E21GXy8iR9vvMdHQiY6C0XJRIzo9QzAi4QWQ8+Iel8HLG8KlRYgirb1co0OBRSvHPhCA0HOQE=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:e802:b0:237:e3a0:9d63 with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-23e2576c517mr17978555ad.43.1752641905912; Tue, 15 Jul 2025 21:58:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 1064022179695 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Wed, 16 Jul 2025 00:58:24 -0400
Received: from 1064022179695 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Tue, 15 Jul 2025 21:58:20 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mimestream 1.7.1)
References: <F9C3585F-AF98-42E1-A7DA-24B9AC1DA0B1@bluepopcorn.net> <CAHBU6ivs7ucNLqqe5dkNM2J5R11YAV20jYc45fFhFsv4rT6sLw@mail.gmail.com> <2FBD5774EDA06F83FE75AC02@PSB> <CAL0qLwan85quE8nh9ZdG=e=RSZWe-vAeNFYJF-EcAdsE9G4ovw@mail.gmail.com> <CAM6SWqxiCG0dYuzt+5Vvck=4=sEuvXX5vKXjh78NX57tQKbAEw@mail.gmail.com> <CAHBU6it6dDhi4ZJqF3jFPpxQgwaPT6fAwJjpguh++Y1a55jpLQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAM6SWqxo1Tr-PjCCeRuJuDNkCN_7FTKb7zFz0Agmt0iaged8Pw@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwZG4vZ25N=YRjbsMSxORQSpTKJ3SVrNnD_COCRZ77MYHQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwZG4vZ25N=YRjbsMSxORQSpTKJ3SVrNnD_COCRZ77MYHQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2025 00:58:24 -0400
X-Gm-Features: Ac12FXwDk6dSlRjry7fi-YV9e6jczk8FN4X9dYLqW8M3RfjOPO6X_GbxopNjL0k
Message-ID: <CAHBU6itPwgNPz_+nwFxvcT3XPjnxm=+xPTUn+vdkO5qh=kcsFQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000388557063a04be43"
Message-ID-Hash: QJUCVOQQ7YIUFERWX3LG4MO5OBWSP4CP
X-Message-ID-Hash: QJUCVOQQ7YIUFERWX3LG4MO5OBWSP4CP
X-MailFrom: tbray@textuality.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-dispatch.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: dispatch@ietf.org, Rob Sloan <rmsj@google.com>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [dispatch] Re: IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-dispatch-mime-protobuf
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dispatch/f_p-Cveq7Vz4xWrGG-Nt8FOD1h0>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dispatch>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:dispatch-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:dispatch-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dispatch-leave@ietf.org>
I commented on the proposed patch in a GitHub reply, one teeny language nit and also on the PRECIS issue. -T On Jul 15, 2025 at 7:24:43 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com> wrote: > Tim, are you good with this alternative proposal? > > -MSK > > On Tue, Jul 8, 2025 at 9:57 AM Rob Sloan <rmsj@google.com> wrote: > >> > Would be happy to suggest language, but this isn’t rocket science >> >> I have concurrently added this patch >> <https://github.com/wkumari/draft-murray-dispatch-mime-protobuf/commit/c666f8e1c6810cbc54b0e93658e1ae6ec3dc5886> which >> is a bit more general: please let me know whether that looks good to you >> and feel free to comment directly if not. >> >> On Tue, Jul 8, 2025 at 12:32 PM Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com> wrote: >> >>> On Jul 8, 2025 at 10:26:23 AM, Rob Sloan <rmsj= >>> 40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Tim, >>>> >>>> > applies no restrictions to the contents of strings >>>> >>>> I am happy to add a section to encourage the safe handling of Unicode >>>> strings within a Protobuf encoding and cross-reference to this document. >>>> Your point that special or unassigned code points may cause application >>>> misbehavior is certainly well taken. >>>> >>> >>> Would be happy to suggest language, but this isn’t rocket science: “Be >>> aware that some Unicode code points can cause problems, which are discussed >>> in [UNICHARS] and [PRECIS]." >>> >>> Note that parse-time UTF-8 format enforcement on string fields is >>>> optional <https://protobuf.dev/editions/features/#utf8_validation> for >>>> backward compatibility with proto2. >>>> >>> >>> Didn’t know that. Blecch. Might be worth mentioning in the doc? >>> >>> -T >>> >>
- [dispatch] Re: IETF WG state changed for draft-ie… Jim Fenton
- [dispatch] Re: IETF WG state changed for draft-ie… John C Klensin
- [dispatch] Re: IETF WG state changed for draft-ie… Jim Fenton
- [dispatch] Re: IETF WG state changed for draft-ie… John C Klensin
- [dispatch] Re: IETF WG state changed for draft-ie… Rob Sayre
- [dispatch] Re: IETF WG state changed for draft-ie… Tim Bray
- [dispatch] Re: IETF WG state changed for draft-ie… Murray S. Kucherawy
- [dispatch] Re: IETF WG state changed for draft-ie… Rob Sloan
- [dispatch] Re: IETF WG state changed for draft-ie… Tim Bray
- [dispatch] Re: IETF WG state changed for draft-ie… Rob Sloan
- [dispatch] Re: IETF WG state changed for draft-ie… Murray S. Kucherawy
- [dispatch] Re: IETF WG state changed for draft-ie… Tim Bray
- [dispatch] Re: IETF WG state changed for draft-ie… Rob Sloan
- [dispatch] Re: IETF WG state changed for draft-ie… Tim Bray
- [dispatch] Re: IETF WG state changed for draft-ie… John C Klensin
- [dispatch] Re: IETF WG state changed for draft-ie… Rob Sloan
- [dispatch] Re: IETF WG state changed for draft-ie… Rob Sayre