IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dispatch] Genart last call review of draft-hardie-dispatch-rfc3405-update-03

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Wed, 02 September 2020 05:49 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: expand-draft-hardie-dispatch-rfc3405-update.all@virtual.ietf.org
Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 534E83A0BD3; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 22:49:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: xfilter-draft-hardie-dispatch-rfc3405-update.all@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xfilter-draft-hardie-dispatch-rfc3405-update.all@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F05E33A0BD2; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 22:49:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jpm91tK3HiEq; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 22:49:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vs1-xe36.google.com (mail-vs1-xe36.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e36]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A744E3A0BBB; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 22:49:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vs1-xe36.google.com with SMTP id b123so1939330vsd.10; Tue, 01 Sep 2020 22:49:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Ig/8f/Gbw3Uyn9EZFooAJLXEDgD+lBdM/VzANurmjEs=; b=qDL2KDkEtPKpllCVleklcWZK+s1zYhYhI7sdy3P193jHlGoTGEF6Ai2geIrLtmGHMS bV5QkwK2+e+OAq/ilzZW0ffd0f11B6N7y0mUbN9RNSq5LG71/3UTM4NqEgInRATkGt3j O2hQkdhJRV/GAc2Qu9k0xzN6RZ+LP71/CAaWZLIVtxfhsNdeX5t6pVTM2ZG5mD2JSxvG j93DgbHs41/rthwom3x1WMlxEHY/F/gf3r503A2iCmBSLOnKyEU4O2O+mgXMTzR2vnpa VRnocJ51TKkt6MpKPKVOqgdpwSJbga+hDK81WUCTwkwVdjc5ChCJ9vlSxCkGH/b/WRTn AqRw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Ig/8f/Gbw3Uyn9EZFooAJLXEDgD+lBdM/VzANurmjEs=; b=dtLFF9z2tOfNf8+bRLGgfDgHU47Jfk62qhGV58oOUKPsT0I0lHNe6UGaCoredfKymV Ld6IAFM3NE0I/akCY/eZTCFPbRAqzxn7E0uzbDwRhLLo5c/S1o6zf9VbOLdcSsJnoldC 3VAgpHPQnBZmBQkeQF0KOmbjWLJxLNoOmFLS4NS/325pFqlMPFZXRiNhBrF1hOB/kOZd 6/SCATTyQHcf+4H8voyKmLpGho92Gv0YRmCtIjeQMnQvCKuXwre/lSTixi17fq8zKqwr CP9tWLZeo7/ca05ounBZXoGaOCVwReq3yADVxOYqNskJsKtYmfB+kd6e7NJu0rUsqeN+ x6qA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530O52DDZ/Sz2SrxuNAuFmuaISbun3E/ngJOywhuCVFKMjWzFdsb asCS+A7tNQbJj8VXrQgLKz4Kp2MCoJgZHc89YcUOBfqDDzdQCqmH
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxQf5GrqdnPLonTv5TGn5z4nfkxeI6RiFV+YKYhpsbtuZzqdRKkB8bL18TWO3YGN+5Midv0Em7LMsFOhutUK2Q=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:44e:: with SMTP id e14mr4430332vsq.185.1599025761664; Tue, 01 Sep 2020 22:49:21 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <159893058662.23844.17177953972396775177@ietfa.amsl.com> <1066090379.166058.1598958286518@email.ionos.com> <CALaySJJaUDysmd+MFtQY1EfxjhVTq9sxEbQa6tf6Wy8g_3ERiA@mail.gmail.com> <674529702.175704.1598975928192@email.ionos.com>
In-Reply-To: <674529702.175704.1598975928192@email.ionos.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2020 22:49:09 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwYajVR-MDHdnFzY-n4Rqzur4GHBpmQL63YBz2b74Bqa1g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com>
Cc: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, Brian Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, draft-hardie-dispatch-rfc3405-update.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000082c41e05ae4e3237"
Resent-From: alias-bounces@ietf.org
Resent-To: ted.ietf@gmail.com, barryleiba@computer.org, superuser@gmail.com, barryleiba@gmail.com, spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com, dispatch@ietf.org
Resent-Message-Id: <20200902054924.534E83A0BD3@ietfa.amsl.com>
Resent-Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2020 22:49:24 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dispatch/hRGuRU1cEHZkxuLsq17MroodZEg>
Subject: Re: [dispatch] Genart last call review of draft-hardie-dispatch-rfc3405-update-03
X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2020 05:49:24 -0000

On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 8:58 AM Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com> wrote:

> >While it's certainly possible to add such guidance now, this update is
>
>very narrowly targeted to fix a serious problem, and I would not want
> >debate about additional text to get in the way of that.
>
> And doesn't using this draft as an update of the entire IANA
> considerations section effectively remove any means of registration through
> the mailing lists provided in that same section??
>

This draft doesn't replace the entire IANA Considerations section of RFC
3405, but rather amends it.  That is, after this is published, to get the
full IANA Considerations for BCP 65, you would read RFC 3405 and then apply
this document as a sort of "patch".  That's what we mean when we say "RFC Y
updates RFC X", which will be the end result here.

The specific effect of this document when published is to amend Section
3.1.1 of RFC 3405 such that instead of saying "registered under the IETF
URI tree", it becomes "a registered permanent URI scheme", and then take
"tree" out of the next sentence, and rename the section to something more
appropriate.  This draft could spell out each of those edits precisely, or
just replace all of Section 3.1.1 with a new set of text, but it's such a
small change that what's here seems equivalent and unambiguous to me.

-MSK

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email