Re: [dispatch] Virtual IETF107 - SRT draft is available

["Deen, Glenn (NBCUniversal)" <[e-mail]>]

Hi Ben,

I think it still best fits in MOPS, at least initially.  SRT is a popular protocol in use operationally amongst media companies and doing an ingest initially in via MOPS will help get it the visibility and discussion from the media operations viewpoint.    

 While MOPS won't meet until the virtual meetup being planned for April, all that really means is that there won't be an opportunity to present on the draft to a WG until then - but the interims are only a couple weeks out from now, so it's not a massive delay.   

Between now and the interim MOPS meeting the draft can still be discussed and reviewed on the MOPS list.

My worry is that skipping having it run through MOPS to gain the input there would be skipping an important set of eyes that can helpfully contribute to commenting on the draft.

-glenn


On 3/18/20, 9:09 AM, "dispatch on behalf of Ben Campbell" <[e-mail] on behalf of [e-mail]> wrote:

    Hi All,
    
    The chairs would like to see comments about what an appropriate discussion venue for this draft would be. It seems like it sits on the border between TSV and ART.
    
    Thanks!
    
    Ben.
    
    > On Mar 18, 2020, at 1:37 AM, 김준웅님(JOONWOONG.KIM) <[e-mail]> wrote:
    > 
    > Hi all
    > 
    > I would like to draw you attention to SRT draft which is added in the last minute to the agenda of DISPATCH session, coming week (if time is allowed after existing agenda items are handled):
    > 
    > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sharabayko-mops-srt/
    > 
    > SRT (Secure Reliable Transport) protocol is a user level protocol optimized for low-latency live video contribution based on UDT and UDP, over different network conditions. While it has been rather successfully deployed by some industries, we would like to make it an Internet standard and further collaborate in IETF communities for enhancements, which would be beneficial to Internet community and Industries.
    > 
    > The draft was originally submitted for MOPS WG of IETF 107 for discussions, but now there will not be any MOPS meeting until late April. Therefore we would like to discuss this draft in DISPATCH, which might be more appropriate venue to find out where and how a new protocol draft can be handled. I appreciate DISPATCH leaderships and members, for kind consideration.
    > 
    > If you need more clarification about SRT protocol or our intention, please let me know. Any comments or discussions before the meeting would be helpful as well. In the meantime, you can find more information about SRT here (white papers, simple video clips, and open source code):
    > https://www.srtalliance.org/
    > http://www3.haivision.com/srt-open-source-wp
    > https://github.com/Haivision/srt
    > 
    > Thanks so much for reading and your help in advance.
    > 
    > thanks
    > Joonwoong
    > ==
    > Joonwoong Kim | Global Standardization | SK Telecom mailto:[e-mail]
    > 
    > 
    > _______________________________________________
    > dispatch mailing list
    > [e-mail]
    > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch