[dispatch] I-D Action: draft-birk-pep-trustwords-00.txt (fwd)

Bernie Hoeneisen <bernie@ietf.hoeneisen.ch> Fri, 23 February 2018 10:40 UTC

Return-Path: <bernie@ietf.hoeneisen.ch>
X-Original-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75A92124235 for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 02:40:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c8v8aEFmal9S for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 02:40:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from softronics.hoeneisen.ch (softronics.hoeneisen.ch [62.2.86.178]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10131127871 for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 02:40:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by softronics.hoeneisen.ch with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from <bernie@ietf.hoeneisen.ch>) id 1epAmQ-0006eY-2u for dispatch@ietf.org; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 11:40:42 +0100
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 11:40:42 +0100
From: Bernie Hoeneisen <bernie@ietf.hoeneisen.ch>
X-X-Sender: bhoeneis@softronics.hoeneisen.ch
To: IETF DISPATCH list <dispatch@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1802231109080.24956@softronics.hoeneisen.ch>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; BOUNDARY="37663318-1195930349-1519382442=:24956"
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: bernie@ietf.hoeneisen.ch
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on softronics.hoeneisen.ch); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dispatch/jDDmQAI08utN4F2uptu1EgVDVIw>
Subject: [dispatch] I-D Action: draft-birk-pep-trustwords-00.txt (fwd)
X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 10:40:49 -0000

Please be informed that (as promised in my earlier email) the 2nd I-D of 
the pEp (Pretty Easy Privacy) series has just been published. You can find 
it on:

   https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-birk-pep-trustwords/

Abstract:

   In public-key cryptography comparing the public keys' fingerprints of
   the communication partners involved is vital to ensure that there is
   no man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack on the communication channel.
   Fingerprints normally consist of a chain of hexadecimal chars.
   However, comparing hexadecimal strings is often impractical for
   regular users and prone to misunderstandings.

   To mitigate these challenges, this memo proposes the comparision of
   trustwords as opposed to hexadecimal strings.  Trustwords are common
   words in a natural language (e.g., English) to which the hexidecimal
   strings are mapped to.  This makes the verification process more
   natural.

If you consider this work useful, please express your option and view on 
this work on this list now. If you condider this not to be useful, 
please tell us why.

Anyways, we are looking forward to your feedback!

All the best
  Bernie


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 9:17 AM
Subject: I-D Action: draft-birk-pep-trustwords-00.txt
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org



A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
directories.


        Title           : pretty Easy privacy (pEp): Trustwords concept
        Authors         : Volker Birk
                          Hernani Marques
                          Bernie Hoeneisen
        Filename        : draft-birk-pep-trustwords-00.txt
        Pages           : 6
        Date            : 2018-02-22

Abstract:
   In public-key cryptography comparing the public keys' fingerprints of
   the communication partners involved is vital to ensure that there is
   no man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack on the communication channel.
   Fingerprints normally consist of a chain of hexadecimal chars.
   However, comparing hexadecimal strings is often impractical for
   regular users and prone to misunderstandings.

   To mitigate these challenges, this memo proposes the comparision of
   trustwords as opposed to hexadecimal strings.  Trustwords are common
   words in a natural language (e.g., English) to which the hexidecimal
   strings are mapped to.  This makes the verification process more
   natural.


The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-birk-pep-trustwords/

There are also htmlized versions available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-birk-pep-trustwords-00
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-birk-pep-trustwords-00


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/

_______________________________________________
I-D-Announce mailing list
I-D-Announce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce
Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt