IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dispatch] processing path for image/webp rfc

James Zern <jzern@google.com> Tue, 25 May 2021 19:31 UTC

Return-Path: <jzern@google.com>
X-Original-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 881593A1A88 for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 May 2021 12:31:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jePJr4QMeCgQ for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 May 2021 12:31:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x235.google.com (mail-lj1-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05C9E3A1A84 for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 May 2021 12:31:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x235.google.com with SMTP id p20so39688408ljj.8 for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 May 2021 12:31:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=zclZ3S5H/zeKxm0YJlzXpwGIiPjIsZoYTwc+K0QogVM=; b=WW/CbLtCF/w/AoIzOTy9Qh39l7vyg07C/22QzbHpeUamIjB1oMhWbNlk2F9eZQqFAP /ogCSmD4IxHM7qJWvk1f7ql84dwaZ5R2OAsPB5rO4i/9WcuPfSpJcYa3NZtaBKtjMp+w pYH2NFdzEyg24DWxClPVEqW3TG64dPtMW1qo869ueZ02EGRQSQJrEwEYHraRVrWnKVpE A+d2dFqPN23TUrY2Fi017D6e12dJehP1X9zAaZ8u6/Hu+u+es0l2cuNaMxJ7LJAGOkIm +JbUl44ics+9E4RZeBAgnNB0eQwMz0mafPTwEh2YyKkD3sdiHYGxEbil3Dq+KLL7qrrH +bxw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=zclZ3S5H/zeKxm0YJlzXpwGIiPjIsZoYTwc+K0QogVM=; b=neAgFbwGOT4EpRHdGUeZRLNOFyDr5c2+T3lIe2pWwPyNWI2rPpN11n1ElGPtKxCEdO ifmxYwZumemVani8eHCyRi7zYwIZ/BpmCRBTzg18zV1v4OvnpqxrNvldDhESoz+i3LTG 3KInLn69z7hlZnj65soS28AbPm05HljQ4AfWQu3IPf0aU61x4MUCDEHzWP1vOLYjo5au t50lBPduGKI2hUYflceFRQt36Hy0NCrf1b2+1i1D+U7ovBVBit/NDyXkVWaLjnkMdksI TRt4RdVnVIuOxw6l2NxgOvrTSdIzoDo3NqXVF4PhyGF2r64mYlXpvD8Q9SdwwTzyIO9y q+MQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5322+qoRCZw0Al9i+TOTSzZQjFnpeLc3ojyfd2s94bg+FYIGiBBq pJp76CjLw7YLkWCHX5io+7xu1tJcqfZByYL3iFCFXpUXPs0=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxmG8eJcY6pctnCCsD2XBjMWVZcAMeydN5RXpBSm5YWkyDT2xOQ2kyny1Q+oSpCF5LtnMiAUDGSaLrWtNliynM=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9c08:: with SMTP id s8mr22536098lji.64.1621971098282; Tue, 25 May 2021 12:31:38 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CABWgkXLgiNa7S6+AgnVg4rGgWkrv1XL2rduBkn7aKHKfhXAJ=g@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwZfLyb6g8JddxuZpSVBfFMVkxmVQ7vVtw44g==yhvHcVw@mail.gmail.com> <CABWgkX+kOcW451K2GJXvtrvPSa2W1Lkj0043zSQoE+4C+sWKAQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwbkUwcSbKgR8K6Ye7kHxohQBej1cdYeaqYzztx9tK-+7Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwbkUwcSbKgR8K6Ye7kHxohQBej1cdYeaqYzztx9tK-+7Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: James Zern <jzern@google.com>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 12:31:27 -0700
Message-ID: <CABWgkXJXK-q-ge3TjH7Eoxrv_S=1Gd-F8EM=ErZPLa4n3sSi3g@mail.gmail.com>
To: DISPATCH list <dispatch@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000026841105c32c939f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dispatch/jt_BDWRGOWllc9th-ypZlqzylC0>
Subject: Re: [dispatch] processing path for image/webp rfc
X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 19:31:47 -0000

Just bumping the thread for visibility. Are there any opinions on the right
processing path for the image/webp mime-type?

On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 10:13 AM Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 6:45 PM James Zern <jzern=
> 40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 12:53 AM Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 7:58 PM James Zern <jzern@google.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> It was suggested I post a message here requesting advice on the
>>>> processing path of my submission to register the image/webp mime-type [1].
>>>> I'm not familiar with the process, so if you could have a look and see if
>>>> this is appropriate for the DISPATCH working group or suggest another I'd
>>>> appreciate it.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Just a reminder that DISPATCH's charter includes:
>>>
>>> "- By agreement with ART ADs, processing simple administrative
>>> documents."
>>>
>>> If we agree that this work fits that description, then that's a
>>> processing option here.
>>>
>>> I would also suggest this be floated by media-types@ietf.org, if that
>>> hasn't been done already.
>>>
>>
>> I requested a review on that list [2]. Did you want to start a separate
>> thread to request advice on a processing path?
>>
>
> Nope, that's what this thread is for.
>
> -MSK
> _______________________________________________
> dispatch mailing list
> dispatch@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email