[dispatch] [IANA #1176833] Last Call: <draft-hardie-dispatch-rfc3405-update-03.txt> (Updated registration rules for URI.ARPA) to Best Current Practice

Sabrina Tanamal via RT <drafts-lastcall@iana.org> Tue, 22 September 2020 20:55 UTC

Return-Path: <iana-shared@icann.org>
X-Original-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EEE73A0838; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 13:55:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.649
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.649 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JfQibbJJG5lk; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 13:55:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp01.icann.org (smtp01.icann.org [192.0.33.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 361123A046D; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 13:55:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from request4.lax.icann.org (request1.lax.icann.org [10.32.11.221]) by smtp01.icann.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B197E05F6; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 20:55:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by request4.lax.icann.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 086A520356; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 20:55:38 +0000 (UTC)
RT-Owner: sabrina.tanamal
From: Sabrina Tanamal via RT <drafts-lastcall@iana.org>
Reply-To: drafts-lastcall@iana.org
In-Reply-To: <159855628289.21847.11968431519980055634@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <RT-Ticket-1176833@icann.org> <159855628289.21847.11968431519980055634@ietfa.amsl.com>
Message-ID: <rt-4.4.3-32340-1600808137-357.1176833-37-0@icann.org>
X-RT-Loop-Prevention: IANA
X-RT-Ticket: IANA #1176833
X-Managed-BY: RT 4.4.3 (http://www.bestpractical.com/rt/)
X-RT-Originator: sabrina.tanamal@icann.org
CC: iesg@ietf.org, ted.ietf@gmail.com, superuser@gmail.com, barryleiba@computer.org, barryleiba@gmail.com, spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com, dispatch@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8
Precedence: bulk
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 20:55:37 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dispatch/lLJjRemgGf8bWKX5582gwrTmTks>
Subject: [dispatch] [IANA #1176833] Last Call: <draft-hardie-dispatch-rfc3405-update-03.txt> (Updated registration rules for URI.ARPA) to Best Current Practice
X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 20:55:39 -0000

(BEGIN IANA COMMENTS)

IESG/Authors/WG Chairs:

The IANA Functions Operator has completed its review of draft-hardie-dispatch-rfc3405-update-03. If any part of this review is inaccurate, please let us know. 

The IANA Functions Operator understands that, upon approval of this document, there is a single action which we must complete.

IANA understands that the rules for registration in the .uri.arpa zone were established by RFC3405. That document says:

"In order to be inserted into the URI.ARPA zone, the subsequent URI scheme MUST be registered under the IETF URI tree. The requirements for this tree are specified in BCP35."

IANA understands that [ RFC-to-be ] removes this normative requirement and that the new requirement is:

"All registrations in URI.ARPA MUST now be for schemes which are permanent registrations, as they are described in BCP 35."

On the .ARPA Zone Management page located at:

https://www.iana.org/domains/arpa

IANA Question --> RFC3405 is listed as the reference for the .uri.arpa zone. Upon approval of this document, should this reference be replaced with [ RFC-to-be ] or should this document be added as an additional reference?

The IANA Functions Operator understands that this is the only action required to be completed upon approval of this document.

Note:  The actions requested in this document will not be completed until the document has been approved for publication as an RFC. This message is meant only to confirm the list of actions that will be performed. 

Thank you,

Sabrina Tanamal
Senior IANA Services Specialist

(END IANA COMMENTS)