[dispatch] Proposed charter for DCRUP
"John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Mon, 27 March 2017 16:57 UTC
Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BE8612946C for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 09:57:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=sADfrdeW; dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=o/3x8bMn
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bZTL0kV6thfm for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 09:57:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 503291293FC for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 09:57:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 31517 invoked from network); 27 Mar 2017 16:57:22 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=7b1b.58d94472.k1703; bh=DClC2sDgfpt+ws82ElDN64uziDj5O1tcA1xta4+wSRQ=; b=sADfrdeWBIOkwWC9Z2uDeg3ur/2xRnfpuIRzh5D4KVKudgt8quXuNwsnewgDYwA2wZKx1c8X7aIBp2h7d9pD51DEFsMcUqxTikePrZ8YhHb1vstmUv80DSFr16pklGJQ7O14yGmE2e5Iyw8iAwymsE6B/kN4XrChDk6Q5yoPTVNj2xgYkpZi9CMNpH1euefCWhzd503wS8iHZE2nF3QPU0n3CvZBCj3ZHSUalVW8hL8tdTYS2+bHiRpMnQsQ7iTR
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=7b1b.58d94472.k1703; bh=DClC2sDgfpt+ws82ElDN64uziDj5O1tcA1xta4+wSRQ=; b=o/3x8bMnM/4FyiabDMOyxZ4RjI8T4T8cuLaIID1Kw7fgcdf9IoWtGh/6NfVEAB0tkzIPhC3uqt3w2Zj/2Ai6BVcN4ls5LPodKUSa76/Ql2H79c6gxK4FDdpw23CkKLIeSxVZLoQ39j5OWBaGjexkOwIWZT/EAZO3yuwgltovgzw05slk4S4E++WLZM5JBlXnINKimXZaAYbTNLWL65qn/rISNxqIKA7HuUtHFo1R+CceVrP1x18v7hC4KQWAvOEp
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.2/X.509/AEAD) via TCP6; 27 Mar 2017 16:57:22 -0000
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 11:57:20 -0500
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.20.1703271129060.7578@dhcp-80f1.meeting.ietf.org>
From: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: DISPATCH list <dispatch@ietf.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (OSX 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dispatch/paINrBH9RhelTNmkObZ6GebLKaE>
Subject: [dispatch] Proposed charter for DCRUP
X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 16:57:35 -0000
The DKIM Crypto Update (DCRUP) working groupkin is chartered to modify DKIM to handle more modern cryptographic algorithms and key sizes. DKIM (RFC 6376) signatures include a tag that identifies the hash algorithm and signing algorithm used in the signature. The only current algorithm is RSA, with advice that signing keys should be between 1024 and 2048 bits. While 1024 bit signatures are common, longer signatures are not because bugs in DNS provisioning software prevent publishing longer keys as DNS TXT records. DCRUP will consider two types of changes to DKIM: additional signing algorithms such as those based on elliptic curves, and new public key forms, such as putting the public key in the signature and a hash of the key in the DNS. It will limit itself to existing implemented algorithms and key forms. Other changes to DKIM, such as new message canonicalization schemes, are out of scope. The WG's output will be an update to DKIM describing the changes to DKIM signatures to represent new algorithms or key representations, and to DNS TXT records containing public key information. Milestones: * Adopt draft for new algorithms and key forms * WG last call * Ship it Regards, John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
- [dispatch] Proposed charter for DCRUP John R Levine
- Re: [dispatch] Proposed charter for DCRUP Martin Thomson
- Re: [dispatch] Proposed charter for DCRUP Eric Rescorla
- Re: [dispatch] Proposed charter for DCRUP Barry Leiba
- Re: [dispatch] Proposed charter for DCRUP Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [dispatch] Draft and Proposed charter for DCR… John R Levine
- Re: [dispatch] Proposed charter for DCRUP Jim Fenton
- Re: [dispatch] Proposed charter for DCRUP Murray S. Kucherawy
- [dispatch] Proposed charter for DCRUP v0.2 John R Levine
- Re: [dispatch] Proposed charter for DCRUP v0.2 Jim Fenton
- Re: [dispatch] Proposed charter for DCRUP v0.2 Federico Santandrea
- Re: [dispatch] Proposed charter for DCRUP v0.2 John Levine
- Re: [dispatch] Proposed charter for DCRUP v0.2 John Levine
- [dispatch] Proposed charter for DCRUP v0.3 John R Levine
- Re: [dispatch] Proposed charter for DCRUP v0.3 Eric Rescorla
- Re: [dispatch] Proposed charter for DCRUP v0.3 John R Levine
- Re: [dispatch] Proposed charter for DCRUP v0.3 Eric Rescorla
- Re: [dispatch] Proposed charter for DCRUP v0.3 John R Levine