Re: [dispatch] IETF 114 - do you have something for DISPATCH?
Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Wed, 22 June 2022 04:17 UTC
Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD256C14792E; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 21:17:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.11
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.11 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=hfCK19tB; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=i03OxzA5
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PcIdCAq2wMzh; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 21:17:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.19]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 645AFC15AAFD; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 21:17:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F7403200124; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 00:17:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 22 Jun 2022 00:17:33 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h=cc :cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1655871452; x= 1655957852; bh=LuZg39GDHaVWAIOAJ+XYea7NvPPMNxDxzwFiiNclvS0=; b=h fCK19tB9kgClIzhiAu8HSP6Ge1CvtI1XvsANv2/sV0OMK8dfwrM5tLnKBrYYThWs mPdvwY1Uksa3VFYR6tRsCeTgQhkk1AkjLrDepR2y7lzOS9T3V1bgtkjYsS2Z7IIf BivcocuGOgiFG3BpbLrJMddtqnR/nuieM8BfiP4+QwS/KzfcZSaIhvSG/1axGGu2 wZ9fz3Ijqwsy7/DOjptZXjVG1CgYGXHJdIKzuUu4d3ZTukApLC0nK6BFAMTHzbQ9 0VylQit0TPbaeL6DepietknCKd1IASXWV8P81lUBwLz5r2FwsimYG+xG9ScwbGTJ N0OygUIMTh8RePEyj2fQg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t=1655871452; x= 1655957852; bh=LuZg39GDHaVWAIOAJ+XYea7NvPPMNxDxzwFiiNclvS0=; b=i 03OxzA5/8PVnNykjnn2DlgN7JwPDh6QsydS8xRuhVOa8Yq7IFIanwiCEJhxqcZbT kjwb1xiMcPCcS+0Ic0pmLUXkHbA72l0rfeaCGJSQa0P9SSMxFfV1gj6SyNrUHDiE wBHE1RLjBxOH9NRuT453LG2BWj0s4oWj6Ua7rvOWAC1w3U6DVcu8UwDao5XO5Rfv BXl2MBqk5MwEqSwHH0uiD8SxoyngSnz6g3SEpUQ1oYa97LZh7yYi2QrWOqMFpD0O g2WzTUnyI1MFtO6VULtvh57BwGUwRTFMLGtwaV1/ZkJPy+vvmv0Rr7kXjLQV5idY bwOPxLDf1oVO/XWuFY03w==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:3JeyYmXxSw6LdhBDWusL3ojJDIEGGd3cJIyDzwqQ7WxPjwlH7wfw3Q> <xme:3JeyYimiSLh1gHTwaywFESGtjV6v_cjF8isKqrP5qJtUgOxn4_9nhJxLinYNBC87K x8nm7Hjz-ofLSkDlA>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:3JeyYqY5yrvIB6s1d_3E0cZh-o5XbxaRv-_11p2NgsIuqtZHPhsWJu2SfGpjBFbAliBfWlwNGmNen-imwS3HJea6uE6LE_DoqDC-XlVU7L5DSMSsGR7cZvze>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvfedrudefgedgkedvucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne goufhushhpvggtthffohhmrghinhculdegledmnecujfgurheptggguffhjgffvefgkfhf vffosehtqhhmtdhhtddvnecuhfhrohhmpeforghrkhcupfhothhtihhnghhhrghmuceomh hnohhtsehmnhhothdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepiefgueelffekkeevledu hefggfeguefhveegveejheekueefvefhgeegudehtedtnecuffhomhgrihhnpehivghtfh drohhrghdpghhithhhuhgsrdhiohdpghhithhhuhgsrdgtohhmpdhmnhhothdrnhgvthen ucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehmnhhoth esmhhnohhtrdhnvght
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:3JeyYtUb0QK6YZtKlf1vOKWmq44V48YLetm6PqePEpK0W006x8mDIQ> <xmx:3JeyYgn8qawzAst7fl58AO6Lw5qK40IAyW-7P-aPG3c3VF_ouuW8Zw> <xmx:3JeyYicCA-QEYTaoNPuGY_rOCAfTlQzlZlwByv84j4Mc41xTEOrJ-Q> <xmx:3JeyYlwhi5b6I30PgirrZ6P1nCYOJLDTSo99v3BScnBPpoI7Sw3GeA>
Feedback-ID: ie6694242:Fastmail
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 00:17:31 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.100.31\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <32c3f485f7e74b059d98760fbda894b0@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 14:17:26 +1000
Cc: "dispatch@ietf.org" <dispatch@ietf.org>, dispatch chairs <dispatch-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <7EC18121-169C-48CC-98C8-9F56F9481839@mnot.net>
References: <32c3f485f7e74b059d98760fbda894b0@huawei.com>
To: "Pengshuping (Peng Shuping)" <pengshuping=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.100.31)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dispatch/qb95Bj33mxHmzzWmRxHalXautlc>
Subject: Re: [dispatch] IETF 114 - do you have something for DISPATCH?
X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 04:17:41 -0000
Hi Shuping and Kirsty, Could we reserve some time for a very brief discussion of the document below? Cheers, Name: draft-nottingham-feed-privacy Revision: 00 Title: Privacy Considerations for Web Feed Readers Document date: 2022-06-21 Group: Individual Submission Pages: 7 URL: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-nottingham-feed-privacy-00.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-nottingham-feed-privacy/ Html: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-nottingham-feed-privacy-00.html Htmlized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-nottingham-feed-privacy Abstract: This specification collects privacy-enhancing guidelines for Web feed readers. About This Document This note is to be removed before publishing as an RFC. Status information for this document may be found at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-nottingham-feed-privacy/. information can be found at https://mnot.github.io/I-D/. Source for this draft and an issue tracker can be found at https://github.com/mnot/I-D/labels/feed-privacy. Note to Readers This draft is a quick straw-man; it is intended to assess implementer and community interest in the topic, not to state concrete requirements (yet). Feedback much appreciated. > On 20 Jun 2022, at 11:56 am, Pengshuping (Peng Shuping) <pengshuping=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > It's that time again - we're calling for agenda topics for our next meeting at IETF 114 (23 - 29 Jul 2022). No matter how big or small, if you have something you'd like dispatching or that you think will be of interest to the ART AREA, get in touch and get involved. > > If you would like time at the meeting to discuss your work or ideas, please email Kirsty and me on the dispatch chairs email (CC'd). We're keen to hear from you! > > And if you're not really sure what this dispatching thing is for, or if you have any questions about bringing new work, please get in touch with us all the same - we're here to help. > > We look forward to hearing from you. > > Kirsty & Shuping > _______________________________________________ > dispatch mailing list > dispatch@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
- [dispatch] IETF 114 - do you have something for D… Pengshuping (Peng Shuping)
- Re: [dispatch] IETF 114 - do you have something f… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [dispatch] IETF 114 - do you have something f… Pengshuping (Peng Shuping)
- Re: [dispatch] IETF 114 - do you have something f… Anton Tveretin
- Re: [dispatch] IETF 114 - do you have something f… Pengshuping (Peng Shuping)