Re: [dispatch] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-dispatch-javascript-mjs-12: (with COMMENT)

John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Tue, 04 January 2022 06:47 UTC

Return-Path: <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Original-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9430B3A1810; Mon, 3 Jan 2022 22:47:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TyGJAagsLp9z; Mon, 3 Jan 2022 22:47:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bsa2.jck.com (ns.jck.com [70.88.254.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF70A3A180F; Mon, 3 Jan 2022 22:47:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [198.252.137.10] (helo=PSB) by bsa2.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <john-ietf@jck.com>) id 1n4dbg-0008KN-7j; Tue, 04 Jan 2022 01:47:40 -0500
Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2022 01:47:34 -0500
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: Mathias Bynens <mths@google.com>
cc: "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, DISPATCH WG <dispatch@ietf.org>, Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>, dispatch chairs <dispatch-chairs@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-dispatch-javascript-mjs@ietf.org
Message-ID: <85C9EF91667C0DBC2081BCE4@PSB>
In-Reply-To: <CADizRgZYKbEHL+EHBAjx-B7ebN9fcuEQPTmByMJN0vVrf5T=sQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <164121216097.11389.15651087256093939724@ietfa.amsl.com> <FC6009D4-0D9F-4DF4-8779-E9DF34BD669B@cisco.com> <0625341AF32289336E964A99@PSB> <CADizRgZYKbEHL+EHBAjx-B7ebN9fcuEQPTmByMJN0vVrf5T=sQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 198.252.137.10
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: john-ietf@jck.com
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on bsa2.jck.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dispatch/uBFBW6n3YKA00fPE75hbyL9py7o>
Subject: Re: [dispatch] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-dispatch-javascript-mjs-12: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2022 06:47:50 -0000


--On Monday, January 3, 2022 18:51 +0100 Mathias Bynens
<mths@google.com> wrote:

> The phrasing I used in my patch was:
> 
> "Ecma International's Technical Committee 39 (TC39), the
> standards body in charge of ECMAScript, has determined that
> media types are outside of their scope of work
> {{TC39-MIME-ISSUE}}."

IIR, Ecma International might prefer 

	Ecma International's Technical Committee 39 (Ecma TC39)

As another alternative, you might check with the RFC Editor
Staff as to whether they think "Ecma" is a well-known
abbreviation (like "ISO", etc.).  If so, you could just say
"Ecma TC39"  and save the additional words.

But your version is almost certainly good enough.

   john