IETF Logo Mail Archive

[dispatch] Re: IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-dispatch-mime-protobuf

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Wed, 16 July 2025 02:24 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dispatch@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: dispatch@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E52E449102B for <dispatch@mail2.ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Jul 2025 19:24:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6QMyvadXPWb0 for <dispatch@mail2.ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Jul 2025 19:24:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x12e.google.com (mail-lf1-x12e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3DAE4491020 for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Jul 2025 19:24:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x12e.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-553b16a0e38so6380485e87.1 for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Jul 2025 19:24:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1752632696; x=1753237496; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=WLXUVs3Z78jph0bzh9i1igFS3qlL1DExr461Rq5SirQ=; b=E3J6dUZxfd45pykhz9lwxv6DGBl0try83eDmLUneBg+towwt1pxdlWFNQkaQWan3e/ cQL4mRJSujibTEZ9lDfx6zZtEd3ejEIz2MMbK73PFrlugVHBjzdy/yBMmGeTy8MCNNkX Y0RdYEY/wyq3f8arPvIyFsJjg0xWK2saWZfMLBa1eQnXdlTr+8rv0zJrqatJJ/LHoMG0 Vg+Rp8smEVgKQXWaUHj569XbXjvh0JT2qAKnFlq5bNdLef8kROM95/DbN5t7L08j72xY QN8G8tmPeYjvzPoOsgNHXDh0H9QfcB97cWdr8sQn3Hz9CpCzxcIS/FKVVP5gfow0GNKl +4rQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1752632696; x=1753237496; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=WLXUVs3Z78jph0bzh9i1igFS3qlL1DExr461Rq5SirQ=; b=LHIzVlFtUc5kABbG3I8QoD1h7o1TiS5jPyf7Qhvsn2vMe1K87DjBuirSeNV2msdbkv e+hVLA+yiiceVdjPeScIE4yTJEMeU/xy5DlEouWIRFjhHIV+N12Btg6eVfl5CWT24qVf i04m0cHo0WjQryhX11dwam+hRGc8vKrvDXf24UIVhkkgIwNcuX/V/2aGkX5HuWEXckQ5 EPJl8MFXIvTjA/n/560/U5NqIct3nUUEtY+fijXjiGWegYjR/xKO+o7GX6xbibquLDaN PIw0r5AOxSOJZ5e2lTIJuencOLTXSmWojtO5798pgpWszmX9iLRFqFc2525j3ssOqFQW gIaw==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVccf4uBrVRZimzEFEvAH4htobE45LBjVoijPJOeF5EF6I87AqC8SZbrBW3MQH2m1hvkVUp/nLD8Q==@ietf.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yxfwz7G846hrFWFEruiokqJf2dqk6rL0QJTeJHhD7gtFsGnKNBT FwvjpHISmqorv/HLgxjAbGuKb5cwN/pQ4l3BSvZ4meRguobOv9rymPZfDzfTkV5O/woKe4XvaRD kITkDmEmTO2rIcszNTR/2+nvZx0jZbuE=
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncsieiNosPvQnCHYMe/sTGHLbI5jp86wXxI2HaeYPVgEFyBZeV/CY9RJCF7d1vh e70fn0nGcW0KhfjhBnym1wCvLAv3TIYBA1gWFnuMNkRC6jlP05srhPvulfaRuLYRYk4evoMypk9 +OPMbLt2GGuinnvw4FHOTcmFvu7dAYqph58JjFfD7l68cKd3mw9LoY8zgj431o/C7lHD7ZxEnb5 UnlIV05Kx/itXU8Uw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE334upvXVT1G3A6b/hiOZ7NHPdbFXAgU82WCMiUbo74hVnL3MTkKrwnkiKvyPklUb4/k37QjL+JVy6Vmt7qHc=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:2341:b0:553:5176:48a with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-55a2331be81mr486949e87.21.1752632696130; Tue, 15 Jul 2025 19:24:56 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <F9C3585F-AF98-42E1-A7DA-24B9AC1DA0B1@bluepopcorn.net> <CAHBU6ivs7ucNLqqe5dkNM2J5R11YAV20jYc45fFhFsv4rT6sLw@mail.gmail.com> <2FBD5774EDA06F83FE75AC02@PSB> <CAL0qLwan85quE8nh9ZdG=e=RSZWe-vAeNFYJF-EcAdsE9G4ovw@mail.gmail.com> <CAM6SWqxiCG0dYuzt+5Vvck=4=sEuvXX5vKXjh78NX57tQKbAEw@mail.gmail.com> <CAHBU6it6dDhi4ZJqF3jFPpxQgwaPT6fAwJjpguh++Y1a55jpLQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAM6SWqxo1Tr-PjCCeRuJuDNkCN_7FTKb7zFz0Agmt0iaged8Pw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAM6SWqxo1Tr-PjCCeRuJuDNkCN_7FTKb7zFz0Agmt0iaged8Pw@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2025 19:24:43 -0700
X-Gm-Features: Ac12FXzYga6F0NCv1JFToOhn4xznZVkJ7hnG-5whEhxMsbXIwOauqSYPYbtz-XQ
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwZG4vZ25N=YRjbsMSxORQSpTKJ3SVrNnD_COCRZ77MYHQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Rob Sloan <rmsj@google.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000465341063a02998d"
Message-ID-Hash: QPVQGXXOPPLKMRWZXJMYI44G6VIDIR5C
X-Message-ID-Hash: QPVQGXXOPPLKMRWZXJMYI44G6VIDIR5C
X-MailFrom: superuser@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-dispatch.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: dispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [dispatch] Re: IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-dispatch-mime-protobuf
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dispatch/xmDC0X1_mnBcYCc3Tk8iTcqkFhk>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dispatch>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:dispatch-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:dispatch-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dispatch-leave@ietf.org>

Tim, are you good with this alternative proposal?

-MSK

On Tue, Jul 8, 2025 at 9:57 AM Rob Sloan <rmsj@google.com> wrote:

> > Would be happy to suggest language, but this isn’t rocket science
>
> I have concurrently added this patch
> <https://github.com/wkumari/draft-murray-dispatch-mime-protobuf/commit/c666f8e1c6810cbc54b0e93658e1ae6ec3dc5886> which
> is a bit more general: please let me know whether that looks good to you
> and feel free to comment directly if not.
>
> On Tue, Jul 8, 2025 at 12:32 PM Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com> wrote:
>
>> On Jul 8, 2025 at 10:26:23 AM, Rob Sloan <rmsj=
>> 40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Tim,
>>>
>>> > applies no restrictions to the contents of strings
>>>
>>> I am happy to add a section to encourage the safe handling of Unicode
>>> strings within a Protobuf encoding and cross-reference to this document.
>>> Your point that special or unassigned code points may cause application
>>> misbehavior is certainly well taken.
>>>
>>
>> Would be happy to suggest language, but this isn’t rocket science: “Be
>> aware that some Unicode code points can cause problems, which are discussed
>> in [UNICHARS] and [PRECIS]."
>>
>> Note that parse-time UTF-8 format enforcement on string fields is
>>> optional <https://protobuf.dev/editions/features/#utf8_validation> for
>>> backward compatibility with proto2.
>>>
>>
>> Didn’t know that. Blecch.  Might be worth mentioning in the doc?
>>
>> -T
>>
>

v2.37.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status