IETF Logo Mail Archive

[dispatch] Questions regarding draft-petithuguenin-dispatch-rtp-pmtud-00

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Tue, 21 March 2017 03:20 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEEAB127698; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 20:20:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZYsrc8mqoa1O; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 20:20:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x235.google.com (mail-qk0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B750D120725; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 20:20:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x235.google.com with SMTP id 1so125948408qkl.3; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 20:20:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=kiGFvghBsJMNRyGONl+4caM1Z1GuOdItRVYC95XafhU=; b=nK5f+mJoCNrncMOgGiYljAkMaXqYD+oc7T1NKdi0FGJwHI8E7EOjcZgawbWdVx9ZJa bRzg0D4AR0ZnRfEbR0ANQQeMj8d/sLwE+O2tKU3Jl3qx4jOcsk88hkqXZ7UwHiDGrZ5M IxitaFLj6iS3lMnr+XixB/GxzaDYKM3SgaPUIOzMJMW13TQISuwO0v8gg8w1oZLSspR6 a18L9QOctCuFy9QoweuWapIdVsJBlMRqyZEWNGJd7iqpQONw/C/l+CMhswfAycZqHVFC 5q1PTGQfhfVh7+6Un3JnoCG3U2nJBD1KI/x9PKwlIPsDCgwes7fgn8AQjoNxE/v+Ud9C EKCA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=kiGFvghBsJMNRyGONl+4caM1Z1GuOdItRVYC95XafhU=; b=Vx/TdZlDBZ40lVimO5siewclNzE10IMopYSurMZvsqVczSNYQyvBDn2H6jh+uJ+tbz HlyMSXcS07n97uDewQ1egxmeebI6dX7BTn/Vobf1O3FY0Ttbquo5laC2wW+1NboYA8Yg kE3MRlzHkWcPjjTfT+1A1C/NxgjbhW7QsstLZUHm1F739I/0dwORL/6XrvZJnewAbnMf f6d2U8KxA+AC/rFhVijXgpHz9zHu0nZOkAV3shIX755Z11zR+yE7I08Ky63B9KMWAfzr e5ITrh+OuePGgpzbk2rVRPDEwYu3cOH6s9Eotzou1oSbfgIB90wYE1TrM4Roht88LrLi I9vA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H2C8osAeGJ5t4d7g3zIaH2bRS3Peyxe8QFOy552rcOYa51yG7NFXGUpByFrx0MoswpbTSVevCf7ctQukg==
X-Received: by 10.233.237.20 with SMTP id c20mr29899182qkg.144.1490066455741; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 20:20:55 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.140.27.194 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 20:20:55 -0700 (PDT)
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 14:20:55 +1100
Message-ID: <CABkgnnUhqNAOPx0w3FE8yuBTfV2vL1ok73S-PJjQCktL3nozKg@mail.gmail.com>
To: DISPATCH <dispatch@ietf.org>, draft-petithuguenin-dispatch-rtp-pmtud@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dispatch/y4ypQ_pMff5hUsYBYutne9gLCo8>
Subject: [dispatch] Questions regarding draft-petithuguenin-dispatch-rtp-pmtud-00
X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 03:20:59 -0000

This draft would appear to be firmly in the MMUSIC working group
remit.  I note that the ICE working group defines mechanisms for ICE,
and MMUSIC defines SDP.  Since this really only uses a mechanism that
is defined in TRAM, the only new protocol pieces here are some SDP,
which MMUSIC is good at.

I see that this is a new -00 draft, so maybe it's just too new to have
been discussed.  Was it rejected from those groups?

On the details, ice-options is a better place to signal this.  Drop
the abominable x- prefix at the same time.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email