Re: [Diversity] early mentoring for /any/ draft (was - Re: [Mentoring-coordinators] Participation in active IETF work)

<> Tue, 19 April 2016 16:52 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id D35DD12E92A for <>; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 09:52:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.619
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.619 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C8R7XgqT96Eg for <>; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 09:52:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B91612E119 for <>; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 09:52:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=s2048; t=1461084768; bh=fA4NrEEgwe7CX6QUGG3uU+Sn8ZpVZ3JqwXShk+mrab8=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Subject; b=efPBZbksblGiqxYRp3PuATOgLn3XoQfJ6Ui3oHqlsZ+Ry3B13Wmrx8sTzV8hxf3JSdWy+WjW4Zadk09nFO+KdPfIneUN95wILAzWQm/VyRf6gddAAW+j0CjKgUo3GW0CNqBWWiW9ENq1BCZwFRONCvCf3J/dBEhZBBFRYBOTBP1NNWyNIiAbm0gNffSQzCiZSDHg/97WDDe3hnvVi9+A3LPOMheufOGQajLRqXMLsEn4z9B21hg1sTZvhIoZzyfFKv21/il7Xqkqnx90zYYI4eLXb61eYYdIDcpsKCG19sIaCS4yZPsvVzKynyoEJooDya+pJJzE/7KRAiOePDgrkA==
Received: from [] by with NNFMP; 19 Apr 2016 16:52:48 -0000
Received: from [] by with NNFMP; 19 Apr 2016 16:52:48 -0000
Received: from [] by with NNFMP; 19 Apr 2016 16:52:48 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-YMail-OSG: 5eq0t8YVM1ldrdmXu0I2PQmOurvgltDadlmmm32Uz.snJPD3QlVm7Z9KN6KTADb jWEBtVKurQs5TjRdGe1bS3VEzl8dDwFWWITCtv8RlvIau3MbCGdVs21Z843QUJVLaazcsqtwHCPb _WWw17EXlkFHo13.eEF0QV4SYcOaleaq5nXQorFh9sxBblw.ME41ljqe8S4GfT.Zij.iUEGLElKv EOJ8FGj98EVvCBq.bzpgCgZhTLpwpzeYcjM8AEBMjwx.dawGAud_aReLkUX16eqf90nCF3RZFHnh HqvpazFhrDxNSYqYTbxsQ2UBPcms2K1NAqVHVjzZR_vhNAUfptTBUUQ9Oq.BeNbBFqTNQZw8mSLI Sz4aOJODV_P.BxgF2FRgE7p4Do10PXzujJjc9j8iQUzIZCxt2a1UTMKtCAj72joMz9.X_MahQLpP CQXoqUxirilTZ0geijoMdYCJjHePyeDyDrzqULtJjdCBJOJJOS9r41tBUI8H9HXdRwOE9FkKJBRP 87KKJJP2yO6ejT7DHx.36BWc5eDFGL66dDVJFy4veCfxToM0O6Kc-
Received: by; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 16:52:48 +0000
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 16:52:38 +0000 (UTC)
From: <>
To: "" <>
Message-ID: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_2778484_2098327377.1461084758887"
Archived-At: <>
Cc: "" <>, "" <>
Subject: Re: [Diversity] early mentoring for /any/ draft (was - Re: [Mentoring-coordinators] Participation in active IETF work)
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diversity open mailing list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 16:52:53 -0000

On 4/19/2016 9:35 AM, wrote:
>> think you are right on all counts.  I have seen some very horrible prose
>> from native English speakers.
>> But, the mentoring program is not just for non-native English speakers.
>>  It is for all IETFers.

>There is an appealingly subversive possibility in this:  Getting 
>"outside" people to review work much earlier in its lifecycle.  We have 
>long lamented the fact that we do reviews late in the cycle, after a 
>great deal of energy has been expended and people have become 
>entrenched.  Getting others to review the work early it its development 
>could do considerably more than improve its writing...

The mentoring initiative I want to start after Berlin is for people to solicit a team to work with them to co-author a draft.  That is, person x has an idea (but no draft), he / she gets 5 minutes & 2 foils to present the idea in a webinar.   Others on the webinar ask questions for another 5-10 minutes.   Then, if people would like, they can tell person x that they would be interested in being a co-author.
If person x gets no takers as far as co-authors, he / she may wish to draw the inevitable conclusion.
Of course, if person x feels that they have not fairly represented themselves, they can have a second chance.  But, after the second time, and still no takers ....
BTW, no third chances.