Re: [Diversity] Participation in active IETF work

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Tue, 19 April 2016 14:02 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: diversity@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: diversity@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 772DD12D9DA for <diversity@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 07:02:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C4ElCr5gAp-z for <diversity@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 07:02:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5483C12D9E0 for <diversity@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 07:02:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.168] (76-218-8-128.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [76.218.8.128]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u3JE1xPO014002 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 19 Apr 2016 07:02:00 -0700
References: <5716354B.6030106@dcrocker.net> <1622780532.2650368.1461073843345.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
To: nalini.elkins@insidethestack.com, Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID: <57163A51.4080600@dcrocker.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 07:01:53 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1622780532.2650368.1461073843345.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]); Tue, 19 Apr 2016 07:02:00 -0700 (PDT)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/diversity/UWSCUbNlFRAT2RUlFWV5jj50J6k>
Cc: Hui Deng <denghui02@gmail.com>, Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>, "diversity@ietf.org" <diversity@ietf.org>, Christian O'Flaherty <oflaherty@isoc.org>, Alvaro Retana <aretana@cisco.com>, Vinayak Hegde <vinayakh@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Diversity] Participation in active IETF work
X-BeenThere: diversity@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: Diversity open mailing list <diversity.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/diversity>, <mailto:diversity-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/diversity/>
List-Post: <mailto:diversity@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:diversity-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/diversity>, <mailto:diversity-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 14:02:07 -0000

On 4/19/2016 6:50 AM, nalini.elkins@insidethestack.com wrote:
>>Since we are supposed to do our primary work on mailing lists, the
>>actual model has the simple premise that increasing participation from a
>>region warrants extending the range of regions we hold meetings at.
>>That is, to get the IETF to come a region, there first needs to be more
>>people from that region actively contributing through working group
>>mailing lists.
> Yes, of course.  But, it is a bit more nuanced than that.   I think it
> is difficult to get a real sense of the IETF & the excitement & purpose
> unless you attend live & get involved.

There certainly is a major difference between participating only over 
email, versus also going to meetings.  But note that even if the 
meetings start coming to a region, this means that folk in that region 
need to be able to attend meetings in other regions.


> But, I believe he will be a part of a draft review team & then, I think
> as we get more & more such people, we can point to well thought out
> contributions from new people from various regions of the world on the
> WG email lists.

The review team effort is an excellent idea and I hope it goes well.


> BTW, if anyone is interested in commenting, I have made up a structure
> for how the Internet Draft review teams (guided by a remote mentor) will
> work.  I can post the instructions and structure to the list & would
> love comments from anyone.

Yes, please!

d/
-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net