IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Diversity] Concerns about Singapore

Vinayak Hegde <vinayakh@gmail.com> Mon, 11 April 2016 03:21 UTC

Return-Path: <vinayakh@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: diversity@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: diversity@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3C2312E13E for <diversity@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Apr 2016 20:21:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T0iX5BkR1K5a for <diversity@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Apr 2016 20:21:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22d.google.com (mail-wm0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D8E112DD21 for <diversity@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Apr 2016 20:21:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id f198so127750893wme.0 for <diversity@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Apr 2016 20:21:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=pF+4PE/Wv4Turf2PQv/EO/+/KyglzJ64FhsvTQJoO0E=; b=d8/QuZNAZXeZwswIdooWG78Gd6SaHx9MTneH7N8qMqt8pevRrUKby+n2YAe1OoTT4e 3YJ2NgC/6TWDDTUg8xY66qzmpEw1x+azy7/S2xY1Mz1drMahhq5q9eKnOEOotSCanW2N FH7UYakAZf9O+TF8ik5Z2pYuREdqR09wwZOfS1Sua1R+bN4baG8tnIYGfPmwMfcGdI70 3js57z98oJ0CsxVt2FFp1JP/9muP//ZSyfhUG4q3SL8YPAaXbpUIvU9e0c8R3gr5gko8 8km6MoamIbYD5RFZawFYV28DbxLCMFuOGPA471/FWTZT/GlsgBDMiKIYemR5qm6j3QWR F/6g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=pF+4PE/Wv4Turf2PQv/EO/+/KyglzJ64FhsvTQJoO0E=; b=nHuxR1k4UCdcSMV6/I8slpIXs7TT/aOTl7y5xKLICQy9oL6PXocQeBF98quSmTimZJ 63r4OA38KW2gk6bSc8ORT8kvbUa9jOrBDCw4ZaIgMMvi+bRKLUUeJe01T73JJhwz+/zn Hu9LM6UgLsKtNZxEdz34gf5hOctpjuU4YctjwSV/ZotSXkvJ4OM8QClKRLVI18k34qIR AGaPToe3hlMqwrUSjor9PF7Sxyf+3tL8HeQQ3nmLtov7exJUgIHYmwNWFO4yhsxSmzIl b+GPXQaBgtOShJWIJBTwNzNiqN2+iP7TB7HuaNcrGJvRoiev2ViKVAQkCMGE3yzZmtYf fIug==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJJIutOjUXg7WT3+rGt2O8qmS2Z6G54wpQBMY5TTA1g976VjEZt3pxbWutSZSuYAdUPK5g6+WWK7iQ+Mgg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.78.83 with SMTP id z19mr20807488wjw.5.1460344862798; Sun, 10 Apr 2016 20:21:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.133.99 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Apr 2016 20:21:02 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <570B15DA.4010302@dcrocker.net>
References: <20160410063603.6283348.44889.10575@blackberry.com> <459690655.171220.1460293717474.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20160410074445.0de30c68@resistor.net> <570A8B0E.5060505@cs.tcd.ie> <570A9419.5090009@dcrocker.net> <570AA89F.5050302@cs.tcd.ie> <570AAE2E.9060000@dcrocker.net> <570ACAC9.5070008@cs.tcd.ie> <570B15DA.4010302@dcrocker.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 08:51:02 +0530
Message-ID: <CAKe6YvOv-ip1Eb0Fg0rcw0keTN8y5ttkjQMnnCPHWYRFGVwfJQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Vinayak Hegde <vinayakh@gmail.com>
To: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/diversity/cGxt_NBsO3kAtioUcPaNZC18AaE>
Cc: "diversity@ietf.org" <diversity@ietf.org>, Andrew Allen <aallen@blackberry.com>, Nalini Elkins <nalini.elkins@insidethestack.com>, Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Subject: Re: [Diversity] Concerns about Singapore
X-BeenThere: diversity@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diversity open mailing list <diversity.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/diversity>, <mailto:diversity-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/diversity/>
List-Post: <mailto:diversity@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:diversity-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/diversity>, <mailto:diversity-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 03:21:07 -0000

On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 8:41 AM, Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> wrote:
>> In contrast, I think the current fiasco is just one in an ongoing
>> sequence of mostly minor screw-ups by well meaning folks, all or
>> almost all of which would likely have been easier to handle or
>> less likely to happen if the IAOC and it's subcommittees made much
>> better use of what is the IETF's standard modus operandi: open-ness.
>
>
> Oh.  Ok.  It would be helpful to see a compendium of these screw-ups, in
> order to be able to attempt to analyze them.  Openness about problems begins
> by being clear about what they are.

+1 on that. Dave to be fair, Fred did share an analysis how past venues did
against a set of criteria that we have now in the mtgvenue draft.

Thanks
Vinayak

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email