IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Diversity] Consideration for participation

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Sun, 19 June 2016 13:29 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: diversity@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: diversity@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18DA912B016 for <diversity@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Jun 2016 06:29:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.527
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.527 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=opendkim.org header.b=MQCaJGA0; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=elandsys.com header.b=uzQi1oUM
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tbFI2RC-pD0v for <diversity@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Jun 2016 06:29:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2E6A12B00D for <diversity@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 Jun 2016 06:29:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([197.227.82.31]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u5JDSpB0027681 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 19 Jun 2016 06:29:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1466342944; x=1466429344; bh=aJiJItJSyDOPyWqp7zMzZnRYZXc1SyHD8ErlKv2XDuc=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=MQCaJGA0aS5QZQbbqvm8unR6HBFKWXG1MpIjT0279b+58GxzMS3Abc7+tA8K3LahQ xHB2nsosLiMQiWAgfK0AdvKDsO5mcdmUMmqyGlp15prdcyLhUeDIVgh0q4avwXliFI hEXX9Kn2oFpQJxuzKAn0Q11ctsJUagtxrcVxANTE=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1466342944; x=1466429344; i=@elandsys.com; bh=aJiJItJSyDOPyWqp7zMzZnRYZXc1SyHD8ErlKv2XDuc=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=uzQi1oUMykHHQRDKfx64M1oVrbEBzTAsvn1yLP85Qu8np3mQd/4qWKGm/Tao5Pm3J BC39IXzS+86Rtnfok5nzWw63qZ6jyzr/03adYfRcQ/HSJTv9qgyrH8cnpswCJK+Aiz raYfL6QrPBT+jKcjsWZeNNq5W+xqcqpdXkY6UJ7w=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20160619060038.06d6d240@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2016 06:25:38 -0700
To: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADnDZ8_GfRz=zJMNDMegJAq6pkqJK3NAz67-X8ZBtGWNmULrKw@mail.g mail.com>
References: <20160608135632.20063.81792.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <c0dac7eb-3886-5bd0-4ecb-0f66008fe755@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <6d8e2bb4-e41c-5cf7-18a3-d6eac6e9a13f@gmail.com> <m28tydvh5c.wl%randy@psg.com> <C172F8BC-6339-4762-A600-5AFEEFD3ED6A@piuha.net> <0c54dab2-89cc-6d0f-c8c7-a2a65249d04d@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <6597503E-AB88-4A89-BF86-57B06E7C8FD3@consulintel.es> <0848b990-dec1-78e9-7845-1f5b683a49cd@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <4DD051C3-841E-45EE-82F0-8AF4991685A7@consulintel.es> <72313874-f19d-1a0e-0ffa-cc34e380bb8a@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <FADEFCB4-034F-49A1-999E-D3DF78DBFC89@consulintel.es> <CAAQiQRfeFn-az3n5OGLwQqscWJ_Up6V8M0WSrE4boRbbCLnvug@mail.gmail.com> <CAF4+nEFCtf4HmEZfUvzb7wH_8Ov2g0CdRzzzYsrAhhp2NhR3rg@mail.gmail.com> <128d6b02-bbf9-3afb-7353-4f411a2eb8c2@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <ad649e68-f134-bf71-8c0f-f71869a88bc8@gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20160615173304.0bd677c8@resistor.net> <d4178a9e-273c-4271-30dc-970ba463da9d@gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20160615203654.0b7b9020@elandnews.com> <CADnDZ8_GfRz=zJMNDMegJAq6pkqJK3NAz67-X8ZBtGWNmULrKw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/diversity/eEPgL_SANiQE_9gvRMHVCv57K8c>
Cc: diversity@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Diversity] Consideration for participation
X-BeenThere: diversity@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diversity open mailing list <diversity.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/diversity>, <mailto:diversity-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/diversity/>
List-Post: <mailto:diversity@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:diversity-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/diversity>, <mailto:diversity-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2016 13:29:10 -0000

Hi Abdussalam,
At 04:20 19-06-2016, Abdussalam Baryun wrote:
>I did not understand some lines in both conversation, and sorry if 
>it is long email,

There is a message from Spencer Dawkins at 
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/diversity/current/msg00808.html 
The last part of that message might explain the discussions.

>I think I understood the issue raised, that a participant with low 
>technical contribution should not be equally considered as a 
>participant with high quality, or what is argued is when we decide 
>to go to a city (ex. singapore or paris, etc.) if few high quality
>contributors cannot meet then we should change, or when we decide to 
>go to a city with majority agreeing but that majority are low 
>quality contributors, then we should not go to that city. In my 
>opinion, we should not stop equality and openess, because what makes

My comment was about whether it would be appropriate of me to tell a 
person who cannot attend a meeting because he/she would not be 
treated the same as some other group of persons that he/she can 
participate remotely.  I do not believe that it is appropriate.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email