Re: [Diversity] Participation in active IETF work (was: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration)

SM <sm@resistor.net> Tue, 19 April 2016 20:31 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: diversity@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: diversity@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E7DD12E1C1 for <diversity@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 13:31:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.79
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.79 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=opendkim.org header.b=lx1rLBDN; dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=resistor.net header.b=hGE+jIz6
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K11pG3Phpcm8 for <diversity@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 13:31:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A96712D615 for <diversity@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 13:31:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u3JKVNft013599 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 19 Apr 2016 13:31:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1461097893; x=1461184293; bh=lXSVxw4+/U3WrfSXLQyXtIa3bOmsCuEzLjnaeT2l6tw=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=lx1rLBDN69o+FTRebRsAlm0y9frFbAV3LORZpK3wGtm7QNP0O3BxO9A3dHTqyUc0y Qqm7gXlTUL3usZKcgEUmxKVeQyz1+pt45H3ZA8YwI0aMU0Ogqwh0qniKGFcFgihAoY CAhmx85+rGiHIKBz9VwTLyadXA0bDGiRPrnFAvNY=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1461097893; x=1461184293; i=@resistor.net; bh=lXSVxw4+/U3WrfSXLQyXtIa3bOmsCuEzLjnaeT2l6tw=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=hGE+jIz68s/F3nA2+RLALNMbFJ7erqLAuPQqxFEPKTds0ZWlKzui/XaICfpITISFI ulRy2CbZLubN0SStu7E6Opp3Uo1qYNwabUoszWt392rI9LH0Pklt2vzu/0n+P9JwXY JplO+L921YwMFoRD66e+NVljKdDewXD3FyJksbc4=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20160419123834.10702b38@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 13:31:10 -0700
To: Vinayak Hegde <vinayakh@gmail.com>, diversity@ietf.org
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAKe6YvPG1u_gDdib692M78pYPHqLLhReSr9K00q6GL7y7GVyrA@mail.g mail.com>
References: <57151C55.30206@gmail.com> <746128222.2295531.1461009032633.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20160418172423.1071c670@resistor.net> <CAKe6YvOr46TT+sdrgmLA1mpqpFsDDkyLQS=XA21RD+bSfd4G4A@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20160419082036.0eadf038@resistor.net> <CAKe6YvPG1u_gDdib692M78pYPHqLLhReSr9K00q6GL7y7GVyrA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/diversity/thgQ0wV-_5oSCPdmALibfDEZ2q4>
Cc: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>, Nalini Elkins <nalini.elkins@insidethestack.com>, Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
Subject: Re: [Diversity] Participation in active IETF work (was: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration)
X-BeenThere: diversity@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diversity open mailing list <diversity.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/diversity>, <mailto:diversity-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/diversity/>
List-Post: <mailto:diversity@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:diversity-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/diversity>, <mailto:diversity-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 20:31:47 -0000

Hi Vinayak,
At 12:05 19-04-2016, Vinayak Hegde wrote:
>Yes & No. YMMV everyone is different. Some people are very happy
>contributing remotely and physical meetings might not matter as much
>to them. But this subset is small. I would guess for most people a
>physical meeting still helps a lot. On the other end of the spectrum
>there might be people who have come multiple times and have not
>contributed much or are not as active.
>
>I think it is getting easier to contribute (for someone who wants to),
>thanks to meetecho, remote presentations, wider diversity of meeting
>venues (due to 1:1:1:1*) and various trainings and mentoring that is
>available now. But all said and done IMHO, being at a meeting still is
>a quite different experience (due to physical presence, bumping into
>people - serendipity, focus and facetime)

I read your answer as meaning that non-participation from developing 
countries (or non-participation from people who do not work for large 
companies) does not affect IETF work.

A meeting in, for example, Europe, allows a participant in Europe to 
present his/her draft.  I don't know whether that (type of) 
participant sees remote presentation facilities (meetecho) as a 
workable alternative.  I could not find any first-hand information 
about Africa, Asia or South America.  Please comment if you are 
residing in any of those regions and you tried to attend an IETF 
meeting to present a draft.

I agree that for most people, attending a meeting in person helps a 
lot.  There is the funding problem which affects people from 
developing countries.  If, for example, we compare this with the ITU, 
national governments provide funding to attend ITU meetings.

Regards,
-sm