Re: [dix] DRAFT: WAE BOF minutes

Jeffrey Altman <jaltman@secure-endpoints.com> Tue, 18 July 2006 21:46 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G2xOG-00043Z-HA; Tue, 18 Jul 2006 17:46:04 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G2xOF-00043U-44 for dix@ietf.org; Tue, 18 Jul 2006 17:46:03 -0400
Received: from cpe-68-175-91-105.nyc.res.rr.com ([68.175.91.105] helo=www.secure-endpoints.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G2xOC-00042L-RT for dix@ietf.org; Tue, 18 Jul 2006 17:46:03 -0400
Received: from [192.168.1.13] by secure-endpoints.com (Cipher TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (MDaemon PRO v9.0.5) with ESMTP id md50000025032.msg for <dix@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Jul 2006 17:47:16 -0400
Message-ID: <44BD56D6.8030502@secure-endpoints.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 17:47:02 -0400
From: Jeffrey Altman <jaltman@secure-endpoints.com>
Organization: Secure Endpoints Inc.
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: EKR <ekr@networkresonance.com>, Digital Identity Exchange <dix@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dix] DRAFT: WAE BOF minutes
References: <198A730C2044DE4A96749D13E167AD37BD6557@MOU1WNEXMB04.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> <20060718194907.GW21538@binky.Central.Sun.COM> <86mzb67itl.fsf@raman.networkresonance.com>
In-Reply-To: <86mzb67itl.fsf@raman.networkresonance.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0
X-Authenticated-Sender: jaltman@secure-endpoints.com
X-Spam-Processed: secure-endpoints.com, Tue, 18 Jul 2006 17:47:16 -0400 (not processed: message from valid local sender)
X-Return-Path: jaltman@secure-endpoints.com
X-Envelope-From: jaltman@secure-endpoints.com
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: dix@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 8de5f93cb2b4e3bee75302e9eacc33db
Cc:
X-BeenThere: dix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Digital Identity Exchange <dix@ietf.org>
List-Id: Digital Identity Exchange <dix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dix>, <mailto:dix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/dix>
List-Post: <mailto:dix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dix>, <mailto:dix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0685449111=="
Errors-To: dix-bounces@ietf.org

Eric Rescorla wrote:
> Nicolas Williams <Nicolas.Williams@sun.com> writes:
>> Come to think of it, TLS too could use the same approach to make session
>> resumption stateless.  That would be nice, very nice, if we can get it.
> 
> Something like this?
> 
> 4507 Transport Layer Security (TLS) Session Resumption without
>      Server-Side State. J. Salowey, H. Zhou, P. Eronen, H. Tschofenig. May
>      2006. 
> 
> 
> -Ekr

Do the the browser vendors know about this RFC?

Do Apache and Microsoft have any intention of implementing it?

Jeffrey Altman
_______________________________________________
dix mailing list
dix@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dix