IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dix] DRAFT: WAE BOF minutes

"Ben Laurie" <benl@google.com> Wed, 19 July 2006 10:59 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G39m3-0007oJ-U5; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 06:59:27 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G39m2-0007nx-Si for dix@ietf.org; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 06:59:26 -0400
Received: from smtp-out.google.com ([216.239.33.17]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G39m1-00011u-Aa for dix@ietf.org; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 06:59:26 -0400
Received: from stewie.corp.google.com (stewie.corp.google.com [172.24.0.49]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id k6JAxKp3025313 for <dix@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 11:59:21 +0100
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=beta; d=google.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to: mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: content-disposition:references; b=vVNYwuhgXuqGl0Q+RKgiDb2wzV948qbla7vf5gwMK1ny3Xqz4reeChQlgItVknvtV wwUi7F9g0L6a3hc/Rnzhw==
Received: from smtp-out2.google.com (fpe16.prod.google.com [10.253.5.16]) by stewie.corp.google.com with ESMTP id k6JAvDMx032574 for <dix@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 03:59:20 -0700
Received: by smtp-out2.google.com with SMTP id 16so67527fpe for <dix@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 03:59:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.253.15.5 with SMTP id 5mr811737fpo; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 03:59:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.253.14.2 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 03:59:20 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <1b587cab0607190359i5bf9508foa4b8afe034ed3aee@mail.google.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 11:59:20 +0100
From: Ben Laurie <benl@google.com>
To: Digital Identity Exchange <dix@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dix] DRAFT: WAE BOF minutes
In-Reply-To: <44BD56D6.8030502@secure-endpoints.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <198A730C2044DE4A96749D13E167AD37BD6557@MOU1WNEXMB04.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> <20060718194907.GW21538@binky.Central.Sun.COM> <86mzb67itl.fsf@raman.networkresonance.com> <44BD56D6.8030502@secure-endpoints.com>
X-Spam-Score: -4.3 (----)
X-Scan-Signature: b19722fc8d3865b147c75ae2495625f2
Cc:
X-BeenThere: dix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Digital Identity Exchange <dix@ietf.org>
List-Id: Digital Identity Exchange <dix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dix>, <mailto:dix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/dix>
List-Post: <mailto:dix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dix>, <mailto:dix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dix-bounces@ietf.org

On 7/18/06, Jeffrey Altman <jaltman@secure-endpoints.com> wrote:
> Eric Rescorla wrote:
> > Nicolas Williams <Nicolas.Williams@sun.com> writes:
> >> Come to think of it, TLS too could use the same approach to make session
> >> resumption stateless.  That would be nice, very nice, if we can get it.
> >
> > Something like this?
> >
> > 4507 Transport Layer Security (TLS) Session Resumption without
> >      Server-Side State. J. Salowey, H. Zhou, P. Eronen, H. Tschofenig. May
> >      2006.
> >
> >
> > -Ekr
>
> Do the the browser vendors know about this RFC?
>
> Do Apache and Microsoft have any intention of implementing it?

Apache gets it if OpenSSL gets it. Patches welcome :-)

>
> Jeffrey Altman
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dix mailing list
> dix@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dix
>
>
>
>

_______________________________________________
dix mailing list
dix@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dix

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email