RE: [dix] Re: Dix & OpenId?

Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> Wed, 09 August 2006 16:14 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GAqh7-0004ll-Qd; Wed, 09 Aug 2006 12:14:09 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GAqh6-0004lY-Ol for dix@ietf.org; Wed, 09 Aug 2006 12:14:08 -0400
Received: from homer.w3.org ([128.30.52.30]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GAqh5-0000qy-IC for dix@ietf.org; Wed, 09 Aug 2006 12:14:08 -0400
Received: from dirk.w3.org (homer.w3.org [128.30.52.30]) by homer.w3.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC34F4F50B; Wed, 9 Aug 2006 12:14:06 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: RE: [dix] Re: Dix & OpenId?
From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
To: Digital Identity Exchange <dix@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <198A730C2044DE4A96749D13E167AD37C66C84@MOU1WNEXMB04.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
References: <198A730C2044DE4A96749D13E167AD37C66C84@MOU1WNEXMB04.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Organization: World Wide Web Consortium (http://www.w3.org/)
Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2006 11:14:05 -0500
Message-Id: <1155140045.30621.424.camel@dirk.w3.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: ffa9dfbbe7cc58b3fa6b8ae3e57b0aa3
Cc:
X-BeenThere: dix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Digital Identity Exchange <dix@ietf.org>
List-Id: Digital Identity Exchange <dix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dix>, <mailto:dix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/dix>
List-Post: <mailto:dix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dix>, <mailto:dix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dix-bounces@ietf.org

On Wed, 2006-08-09 at 09:02 -0700, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:
> I think that we are moving to a point where OpenID is more useful as a generic term for what we are building. It has mindshare.
> 
> Since the protocols must by their nature share a good deal of structural similarity and since the idea is for everything to talk to esach other to the maximum extent I think this is the best approach.
> 
> I would like to see SAML, Liberty, CardSpace seen as high end instances of an OpenID. 
> 
> This is more about marketecture than technology.
> 
> Lets start building some use cases that look beyond the bloggy, wiki world.

Yes... it's clear to me how I can use an OpenID persona in the bloggy
wiki world, but I also want to use it for calendar synchronization,
banking and bill paying and getting credit card statements...
maybe even with OFX and quicken. I can't seem to work that out in
my head.

Is this a case of "doctor, doctor, it hurts when I do that; so don't"?
Or does anybody expect that it will, in fact, scale up? Any pointers
to reading material would be appreciated.


-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E


_______________________________________________
dix mailing list
dix@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dix