Re: [dix] DRAFT: WAE BOF minutes
Jeffrey Altman <jaltman@secure-endpoints.com> Wed, 19 July 2006 13:38 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G3CGO-0005qs-Ib; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 09:38:56 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G3CGM-0005qb-Nz for dix@ietf.org; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 09:38:54 -0400
Received: from cpe-68-175-91-105.nyc.res.rr.com ([68.175.91.105] helo=www.secure-endpoints.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G3CGK-0002k9-Di for dix@ietf.org; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 09:38:54 -0400
Received: from [192.168.1.13] by secure-endpoints.com (Cipher TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (MDaemon PRO v9.0.5) with ESMTP id md50000025079.msg for <dix@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 09:40:08 -0400
Message-ID: <44BE3622.6090504@secure-endpoints.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 09:39:46 -0400
From: Jeffrey Altman <jaltman@secure-endpoints.com>
Organization: Secure Endpoints Inc.
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Digital Identity Exchange <dix@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dix] DRAFT: WAE BOF minutes
References: <198A730C2044DE4A96749D13E167AD37BD6557@MOU1WNEXMB04.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> <20060718194907.GW21538@binky.Central.Sun.COM> <86mzb67itl.fsf@raman.networkresonance.com> <44BD56D6.8030502@secure-endpoints.com> <86fygy7fdq.fsf@raman.networkresonance.com> <44BD5C25.4080002@secure-endpoints.com> <1b587cab0607190401x421492f2p19e3bb686e75777a@mail.google.com>
In-Reply-To: <1b587cab0607190401x421492f2p19e3bb686e75777a@mail.google.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0
X-Authenticated-Sender: jaltman@secure-endpoints.com
X-Spam-Processed: secure-endpoints.com, Wed, 19 Jul 2006 09:40:08 -0400 (not processed: message from valid local sender)
X-Return-Path: jaltman@secure-endpoints.com
X-Envelope-From: jaltman@secure-endpoints.com
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: dix@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: a7d2e37451f7f22841e3b6f40c67db0f
X-BeenThere: dix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Digital Identity Exchange <dix@ietf.org>
List-Id: Digital Identity Exchange <dix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dix>, <mailto:dix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/dix>
List-Post: <mailto:dix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dix>, <mailto:dix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0035171713=="
Errors-To: dix-bounces@ietf.org
Ben Laurie wrote: > I'd note that most of the work of supporting these things has to be > done in OpenSSL, and unlike Apache, OpenSSL does not have a large > funded development community. > > Expecting volunteers to rush to implement every cute TLS feature is > asking a lot. The way to make this happen is to find money for OpenSSL > development. Ben: I am very well aware that compared to the applications that use OpenSSL, those working on OpenSSL find it next to impossible to obtain contributions to support their efforts. Individuals and small businesses are not going to write a check for OpenSSL (or an OpenSSL contributor) to develop this code. That's not how people think. Instead someone will write a check to Apache to implement support for said feature because they want it in their web server. The Apache folks will respond with (a) once OpenSSL gives it to us we will have it so don't worry about it; and (b) it won't do you any good anyway because the browsers, webdav clients, etc. don't implement it. We are therefore left with a serious catch-22. The only way that we can get functionality like this implemented is to first obtain agreement from the client and server vendors. Only then might it become reasonable to expect end users to step up with funding. Jeffrey Altman
_______________________________________________ dix mailing list dix@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dix
- [dix] DRAFT: WAE BOF minutes Dick Hardt
- Re: [dix] DRAFT: WAE BOF minutes Eliot Lear
- Re: [dix] DRAFT: WAE BOF minutes Ben Laurie
- Re: [dix] DRAFT: WAE BOF minutes Nicolas Williams
- RE: [dix] DRAFT: WAE BOF minutes Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- [dix] the point of a standards process Joaquin Miller
- Re: [dix] DRAFT: WAE BOF minutes Nicolas Williams
- Re: [dix] DRAFT: WAE BOF minutes Eric Rescorla
- Re: [dix] DRAFT: WAE BOF minutes Nicolas Williams
- Re: [dix] DRAFT: WAE BOF minutes Jeffrey Altman
- Re: [dix] DRAFT: WAE BOF minutes Eric Rescorla
- Re: [dix] DRAFT: WAE BOF minutes Jeffrey Altman
- Re: [dix] DRAFT: WAE BOF minutes Dick Hardt
- Re: [dix] DRAFT: WAE BOF minutes Joe Orton
- Re: [dix] DRAFT: WAE BOF minutes Ben Laurie
- Re: [dix] DRAFT: WAE BOF minutes Ben Laurie
- Re: [dix] DRAFT: WAE BOF minutes Jeffrey Altman
- Re: [dix] DRAFT: WAE BOF minutes Ben Laurie
- Re: [dix] DRAFT: WAE BOF minutes Gavin Baumanis
- Re: [dix] DRAFT: WAE BOF minutes Richard Megginson
- [dix] WAE BOF minutes (Final cut) Pete Resnick
- Re: [dix] WAE BOF minutes (Final cut) Pete Resnick