IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-07.txt

Todd Herr <todd.herr@valimail.com> Fri, 29 April 2022 15:28 UTC

Return-Path: <todd.herr@valimail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25066C157B40 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 08:28:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=valimail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lgCK2zXDLTDg for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 08:28:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qv1-xf2c.google.com (mail-qv1-xf2c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f2c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C007C157B33 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 08:28:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qv1-xf2c.google.com with SMTP id kc16so4686315qvb.7 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 08:28:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=valimail.com; s=google2048; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=F5gctSKyONzaY9nsBJ0r4JJ9i8H/S/INEiTFijY82jk=; b=bU60hozRV0eiYiWNAzFpet1T+exgk3a6qC7NMeAn7Za98W952bRIwNAGBoXGIrqJhm Mm5coToyCAZrYItIJ/4MgDNpeeCCk/WRfPA1mtvtP5VgU5ine2encdO4+wCAkj/EcR1M W8b68MSLk85hvStZ7iImtF1yHHLK8tFRNN7nZgz/AYMqlx+hT57+GScDiagpEJLkl+m7 HMl31qLrUhF6AJ59Mmyaf/EpFoUgyniYqIukAXhiCYnyTCXSV3z6xeao1zYuuHkCIiXp j6nW3PtlC4VK3qgO7PhuX2LYjmjWIE8JALK1Rig4z4Skstm0Ld+TFnVKetl72iOwkec0 TB3Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=F5gctSKyONzaY9nsBJ0r4JJ9i8H/S/INEiTFijY82jk=; b=ifVz3VsZIKiXnpbRtNyvPzVTPL+Fnz512Bf+3VedhoL4je7L2AbXgyZM88ThmJGKEy IRH2Ope7T7XJh31FTOyaUW1SopO2jFv4eguMtCGD963lubf92zF5O1QM5kVr9n80wxIA WnsI9+svPMd0tWGfQaS+KwAM+w5QZywq2bAxn5Yw8ybaNy9ebb5hleuLlguiF6E14L2q tp1vC1opfrNMYj3dIwBraautQNFR9IhZgWRufMtJsmQvyLYls45AbBCMxr/BN17xUjK4 t5UXbA1ctoHRBYyiszo2VVcS7woVp9OxgObFmp8bLWZhyUJmsXDF6i41dU5osmZ0rZqU S3ZA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533FOwAG0B1tfuBKJ+HXHgve6We3k/ytZf2CH6oyYUmhrTA1Rz9P Z4Nx3ZMQaPWiKL3yhKCOu/CNzpC37yMQ0dFp6to6IfjxtVg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxSpnxWkH2Gxy1nY1/ecD3AhgBTVyGxnB1Wh1gZ7vmFrznOALp9/FyHxWNITt5lTOPIFW8M2Qv+HwsTbUKBUwY=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:224f:b0:43f:cd6a:1d6b with SMTP id c15-20020a056214224f00b0043fcd6a1d6bmr28511011qvc.12.1651246094465; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 08:28:14 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <164925666278.4445.13789431014958416691@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAKFywTKyjWy_=YY-2LPzE4y1aY+AsbQ1W2ovvk7Us++1Bwutgg@mail.gmail.com> <43455779.Q0NcroJU1p@zini-1880>
In-Reply-To: <43455779.Q0NcroJU1p@zini-1880>
From: Todd Herr <todd.herr@valimail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 11:27:58 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHej_8mR0jQod4VTZ3fojfPhZO0YOW1bFT=vcT2dByHhVibyZA@mail.gmail.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e5d08105ddccb0b8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/-EDzYAYIwIvz23zGKZeLvZxRFpI>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-07.txt
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 15:28:20 -0000

On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 11:11 AM Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
wrote:

> On Friday, April 29, 2022 3:29:33 AM EDT Robert wrote:
> >
> > Also I've noticed that the dmarc-uri definition seems to be missing
> > the stuff about the file size limitation? At the moment it's just:
> >      dmarc-uri       = URI
> >                        ; "URI" is imported from [RFC3986]; commas (ASCII
> >                        ; 0x2C) and exclamation points (ASCII 0x21)
> >                        ; MUST be encoded
> > not sure what it should be.
>
> I'm not any kind of an ABNF expert, but adding the missing "u" for
> dmarc-psd
> is definitely correct and I believe the *WSP for dmarc-psd and dmarc-test
> are
> correct also.
>
> I would suggest those go into the next revision.  Any suggestions on the
> dmarc-uri question?
>
>
I can put out a new revision today that includes Scott's proposed text for
"Determination of the Organizational Domain for Relaxed Alignment" once we
have something new suggested for the dmarc-uri ABNF.
-- 

*Todd Herr * | Technical Director, Standards and Ecosystem
*e:* todd.herr@valimail.com
*m:* 703.220.4153

This email and all data transmitted with it contains confidential and/or
proprietary information intended solely for the use of individual(s)
authorized to receive it. If you are not an intended and authorized
recipient you are hereby notified of any use, disclosure, copying or
distribution of the information included in this transmission is prohibited
and may be unlawful. Please immediately notify the sender by replying to
this email and then delete it from your system.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email