Re: [dmarc-ietf] Request to accept a new I-D into the WG work items

tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 08 November 2018 01:20 UTC

Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57BDF130DD8 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 17:20:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qi3qogjS-RY0 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 17:20:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg1-x531.google.com (mail-pg1-x531.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::531]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CCF8130DC2 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 17:20:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg1-x531.google.com with SMTP id w3-v6so8083685pgs.11 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 07 Nov 2018 17:20:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:date:subject:message-id :references:in-reply-to:to; bh=9VKnArgV0BqRJLuXcR+6+LXGl87LfJF+5cdqn4quvl0=; b=nZUIHkVMj8vJP9SyBNl0Vk90X6TvcYf9+pUERNAPh9+Bl/h0dZwG1quo5XoM7/fa9l tW10ED+8X3LQoE4lSl0sG96rsZqcIDv1PslVGbWQZrEWkhKF7Cgf+yu4tiICRV31COjm m9AdxkGwuo4d9tHPlgW1jYx2XO94f55/IFlUzkXDQ8NDDGYijJ2vVvEIpTMPsRLgi2Y2 eAH4NzdcCgN8ZqYgGaWq/4bBH3rkKzsD137KcfgQjU7aMCOjt6ozjWfp9rEhZAPJ2GV4 x15cJvTQ1IM+YG559nnVhn1zRXW2FhITpXNgcrOIDRzmouQLcqYiPiey9nsMo+/cNDKa Pk6A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:date :subject:message-id:references:in-reply-to:to; bh=9VKnArgV0BqRJLuXcR+6+LXGl87LfJF+5cdqn4quvl0=; b=NiddWlgjmabK4kftiEA/UXlfd2cS/7PoYhM2QfMKI6iWKxrxdkff+aXcagftLdiub+ KIdufR7B9K0R/Rsc2ftZaeMDhTSowjfQjf82XvmwZOyERPIeuKkSypBx9x3Mw7fhRmD8 Z9ryAqvMC8VhGLrxkMT7TVtGlrdB/xKTLgfNfbcwCDCYXiYDmH5IOKV1To+934/iU2NO WShobtUcUvMu5B3CvMMQNhiULLPrZx21Jb3XeUa+lq2qlMANF0dwm4CHYuaIUCn5DvC1 nWAXWMTDfcHdYLwuRxjthCZLT+LP+It7Zz8ZtgDomRlGVXGKxEiYZ6rh68L7QR35Q8Hz BH5Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gLLr6mFjirIzsawVepkjMg0Ep7vhoM9pKCpTMh0XjqCLg3Qt93S pay9gQUor/L3WBuzxIsoCB5VgtIwfsY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5eWaqMzVS02QO0oDPhz2uIUjSCBzWvFg0tc/g0Rk83Bbz0qa/Sj8hh9q68e64kOlpvbqk3LLw==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:26c1:: with SMTP id m184mr2031659pgm.367.1541640012663; Wed, 07 Nov 2018 17:20:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.19.248.8] ([38.98.37.141]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v1-v6sm1932965pfn.94.2018.11.07.17.20.11 for <dmarc@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 07 Nov 2018 17:20:12 -0800 (PST)
From: tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 10:20:05 +0900
Message-Id: <F63BDCB5-F30B-4CE4-8A10-10967ED4F015@gmail.com>
References: <CABuGu1o4E-Svt9N++RaFvO4SATt3Wh1w7gZb1OdBSVRCm7Odmg@mail.gmail.com> <CAC4RtVCQmV5agORght0XWr27kDD+OkaEZcKcaDtE8wLG0Yi-YA@mail.gmail.com> <dee0fd86-40e3-e01d-6c70-2f467759be8b@tana.it> <93BFC1AD-9CC4-4CB4-89E1-A735AF5CD8E4@kitterman.com> <635dea71-2077-9a1a-e7a2-8594697e1068@tana.it> <AB35FEF5-74C9-400D-9A7F-543F9CAA215D@kitterman.com> <edba3ee3-ec8c-eac8-1b67-606bb340c521@crash.com>
In-Reply-To: <edba3ee3-ec8c-eac8-1b67-606bb340c521@crash.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (16A404)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/-If1pNRdMJOyIrrY_BwjLSR4bbE>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Request to accept a new I-D into the WG work items
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2018 01:20:15 -0000

Total +1 on this. 

From my high tech gadget

> On Nov 8, 2018, at 10:00, Steven M Jones <smj@crash.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 11/07/2018 11:41 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> I'd suggest we adopt the draft/work item and then try to figure it out.
> 
> +1. We should see where we can get with this topic.
> 
> --S.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc mailing list
> dmarc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc