IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Been Quiet Around Here - Org Domain? Tree Walk?

Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> Sun, 03 April 2022 16:15 UTC

Return-Path: <vesely@tana.it>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFDAD3A1CB0 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Apr 2022 09:15:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.109
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.109 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (unsupported algorithm ed25519-sha256)" header.d=tana.it header.b=5ur/58/q; dkim=pass (1152-bit key) header.d=tana.it header.b=CKYmdfvC
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id czFwOjPZ1SsA for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Apr 2022 09:15:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wmail.tana.it (wmail.tana.it [62.94.243.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5B1E3A1CAF for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sun, 3 Apr 2022 09:15:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tana.it; s=epsilon; t=1649002522; bh=sao06y2+VdUPtmG5S/EljJx7iGDhr5Wv4m+7unVOoH4=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=5ur/58/qr1HUFbM5coLD5XB31/uPXOVN6bSluTkT8lGAGeZKYRki3cjCqulOhC2Jn lBj1CzXHcbT3ZZPN6y7DQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tana.it; s=delta; t=1649002522; bh=sao06y2+VdUPtmG5S/EljJx7iGDhr5Wv4m+7unVOoH4=; h=Date:To:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=CKYmdfvCqAZF5YgsgkW4bgsMWEPEdL9Ltxj+I5fOKaTIPXsorTWHBTrHXhHYDAQuD rBEoxB+sUPEBnw1jgXT5BHit6TVirRLAMKAyhMAMqqKffdFfOkwhuf8UDaohYJPenx H8HNjVno2HzYsrSRbvJ6K8/bzpSsU6CRhzBYJXCdq492wjxEk93PkysnoyIms
Author: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
Received: from [192.168.1.6] (host-95-248-33-254.retail.telecomitalia.it [95.248.33.254]) (AUTH: CRAM-MD5 uXDGrn@SYT0/k, TLS: TLS1.3, 128bits, ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) by wmail.tana.it with ESMTPSA id 00000000005DC0ED.000000006249C81A.00007960; Sun, 03 Apr 2022 18:15:22 +0200
Message-ID: <bed4a39d-26b3-2b86-2d8a-daabadbf49dd@tana.it>
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2022 18:15:23 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.5.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: dmarc@ietf.org
References: <20220317195040.E6EFD3954931@ary.qy> <d2910960-c57c-3223-86b2-d66cf46595cb@tana.it> <ed93ee23-f9af-f82a-7d02-f4c6a1e3e182@taugh.com> <4beaa24b-eccb-fa77-4cb9-0dff8e2c64a2@tana.it> <ac6c221f-6425-82f8-da2c-b47a1acda6b3@taugh.com> <e411e6b8-396b-29ff-fe47-c91c4b31787c@tana.it> <bc21d864-480a-31c2-70a2-03aa29de8c1d@tana.it> <b3577b6b-e9a0-6243-2680-1004d5fd35f4@taugh.com> <fedc8b3a-0c18-dd48-dc7f-35cb5f062b1a@tana.it> <14DD6AAE-AE27-4A43-A082-216E81CC0D9E@kitterman.com>
Authentication-Results: tana.it; auth=pass (details omitted)
From: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
In-Reply-To: <14DD6AAE-AE27-4A43-A082-216E81CC0D9E@kitterman.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/-JQCKWBuxhZJsXvpfK4Jxw_7ccE>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Been Quiet Around Here - Org Domain? Tree Walk?
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2022 16:15:56 -0000

On Mon 21/Mar/2022 23:02:03 +0100 Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On March 21, 2022 5:42:42 PM UTC, Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> wrote:
>>
>> According to the definition, two identical domains having psd=y 
>> are in strict alignment but not in relaxed alignment, which is 
>> somewhat counterintuitive. >
> Actually, no:
>
> "If this process does not determine the Organizational Domain, then
>     the initial target domain is the Organizational Domain."
>
> This text in DMARCbis06 addresses that case.


While that's true, it could be possible to revise the comparison 
process so as to account for identical domains.  In that case, we 
could avoid to call Organizational Domain one with no DMARC record.


Best
Ale
--

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email