IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-10.txt

Douglas Foster <dougfoster.emailstandards@gmail.com> Mon, 22 February 2021 16:54 UTC

Return-Path: <dougfoster.emailstandards@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF83D3A1DBB for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 08:54:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zEJtGhUBVWNl for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 08:54:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ua1-x930.google.com (mail-ua1-x930.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::930]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4051D3A1A1D for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 08:54:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ua1-x930.google.com with SMTP id d3so4539803uap.4 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 08:54:28 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=JNUkPvJCeVJkQ6ehZQeNcsHF0uyzs4uYz79edgRyRcU=; b=MsK3UYpQmpp3Z0YlYCy6j+fgheXIccNFVnX6EqFZNdv6FZUT9svhNgTH3oGanD7SKW vDWTLJNMb+ocLkyNw7RFsUhS9vqbtSRgs72elYppl6OBXZiHiWbyYNCeljjIxyp6Imkl puEhiF2gSPyc/lnccTrRLhafAhihz0dNCi3FnCaoJ3qIxtTGFZ8LtZO2FW6MBXSyC39m i+oXFIifM0NBH0zU98s0f1P1T7BYzOw5FU6U2LVjiaKX/vf3RWho1imF/31Uxm0Ft93i X/o52OvCjlUVsknqAKNQGoDLIXVNP+m4pMbi/4mhHlMgm7haZwPGvDJBx4TCTOGdStG4 25rg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=JNUkPvJCeVJkQ6ehZQeNcsHF0uyzs4uYz79edgRyRcU=; b=HJNgRdmdD/gaO+dfO1Yvuujsl9zYw0hYaBJKFlDG+TpOcA03C32Zk4owatGKdiswx+ BowKPm3Y43IgMrMnzS7XGuSUs1JTjfs0CxmMmafdqhL2aPtPovqnosBk8hCgKhUIvnPG CPv2D3vElXedZJRuIfu4haevU1Tm1K4dfV/M7JscPYgOsFGhrxGHgRsZxxMyYhrJzXPh 937Qm9f7K1jbYSCItcLzO9KYbs4vwHanuMDYo7cQnjXU3b4AF6CorB65zb2K+OH48kFt mb6q1guWS/vwoVlSEZM6u7U/44ZpYiC5NLgf3ooQBV7w1cLUSgGqmoJ6tIGx8/UvaPd4 nqQA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533TT0VJhzoUYgb6AGyyn+234jmLb+1idCnh3ZtpVBrz76T/SkQg XfKB8M0KSOYsjhzm7S2Osj7py7231BUBA5z/D8Byam6S
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJze5Y7ZJ5IcNHi6iAkYIxDYdKvpk8nySy948Q6sUKVWcilQjvvFCkNeNHvPzZdCe4Zk+R+iuyJx975NDXzi1No=
X-Received: by 2002:ab0:5e6:: with SMTP id e93mr14145889uae.109.1614012867088; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 08:54:27 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <161144436332.13490.10651420808048876097@ietfa.amsl.com> <CADyWQ+EhD0nz71dLtUFwb9V_6uuen-k6E5fpvrCg3ZYzfr2JSw@mail.gmail.com> <ba38a9e4-7f43-c747-2d90-f35de22a8399@gmail.com> <CAL0qLwZJaEBrXdE9JOZNOJAgR7iEzfMA86Csi2sNtE5JC7ROUQ@mail.gmail.com> <c5cd9239-b204-255a-48a3-1cdccf18464a@gmail.com> <CAL0qLwYrcg__sewPO+EWfJf-5uoHcnQpFqtw-QoXxngHTJvkAA@mail.gmail.com> <CAC4RtVDCeFQU9RTN6osPTrMpap-Djkx5+Czx=-nKqVeXnyEy1Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwZXkRMLXS7mt28-vEKKk4HgWkP98P8kdYaS1XbcYQvSxQ@mail.gmail.com> <CALaySJLVGhaBhrmDSYayYrcU9JSq_pY6D8=KoirUGCrOeKeHCQ@mail.gmail.com> <2e2b6204-244d-dd6f-dced-e4318562710c@gmail.com> <CAH48ZfwzBHQz7x95nFOnr69gXXAUjKhxkgC+1WN97=i535_s0w@mail.gmail.com> <404eeea5-edbd-b795-57f4-801bb662ceac@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <404eeea5-edbd-b795-57f4-801bb662ceac@gmail.com>
From: Douglas Foster <dougfoster.emailstandards@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 11:54:14 -0500
Message-ID: <CAH48ZfzZkHMuw4r=cs=ApcRY-PquFBMVKDrVDRLmZbAyLGA_Eg@mail.gmail.com>
To: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000009b166405bbefa765"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/-LVKBb_-IejvvTwk67zmBLKDvp4>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-10.txt
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 16:54:30 -0000

That does not answer the question.  We can only clarify the registration
question by clarifying what entity's registration mechanism is in scope.

Do we simply say that this document applies to registrations occurring
immediately below an entry on the PSL?

On Mon, Feb 22, 2021, 11:14 AM Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 2/22/2021 7:49 AM, Douglas Foster wrote:
> > So what is the best nomenclature for referring to the
> > "ICANN-authorized registries"?   Dave's phrase or something else?
>
> Strictly speaking co.uk is not ICAN-authorized.  It's authorized by
> mechanisms internal to the UK.
>
> d/
>
> --
> Dave Crocker
> dcrocker@gmail.com
> 408.329.0791
>
> Volunteer, Silicon Valley Chapter
> American Red Cross
> dave.crocker2@redcross.org
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email