IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Stats on DMARC adoption ?

Seth Blank <seth@valimail.com> Wed, 13 April 2022 03:39 UTC

Return-Path: <seth@valimail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A77443A1C1F for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 20:39:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.108
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.108 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=valimail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6nfwOdbbSdYv for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 20:39:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x730.google.com (mail-qk1-x730.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::730]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D51033A1C20 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 20:39:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x730.google.com with SMTP id t207so506457qke.2 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 20:39:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=valimail.com; s=google2048; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=rioyo2cL+eci//3k5NYHUq0EKgci/+F9kXW96JN78zs=; b=Ezg6yJcdnEUDg+CUilRJyouP5fl2sVTyJzOlm8sYi5TQ/dm5aWtw5Hk2/5xZtiD5jz yab79L5xGZ4y7FUcqhO/Sqn391IwYHcpDQAdLwAzzw/3XA4iVn+/P2CxGwToqdJtHBKg crsuH9oiXK6GfgSQtmZsWEFpSIknLA0/LlUb2zg6kbUJT/B20ttL/7T8fffAciCHjU4L Y49NoSTNC/UC3ZLkCryUVRMOsEjH68qqhYMW0kgoupfm1X1kJjuvZI76yuVR7rd06LFX UKSLFOlOYh78SLERoyvazju1Md90r2xjXtel9EjKjlcFfEDn1YEiq3qIfU5AjZsvELY/ PjlQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=rioyo2cL+eci//3k5NYHUq0EKgci/+F9kXW96JN78zs=; b=GiNuC7kr1bZY32cap53uImLrIK3eqtlWXBq15bSkh8LbI5At000wSDb1ieWYXZn8Tp WhQSmDQzCAy+/6zxw5PTSJ1cPKhmRUF+eeMf1da4HSPBkxugH3yGbXDSKHVEc4spE0qZ AmKIaFEQPSFvmgz7BSuqmssQnAWUzTa2Ot15+rpdcv2HrwhZyipmo49YwGYmV3SyKUDV 3TJV8WEZoHwjOH5/MLb3bK7dT7Cbb9+hHF8cS11CwHaqp9BDC/xzJOKDstwxwi70SKY5 Z8Gk+W/Ax5SL02lk+HTmtBc0vMO1+ZrYqQMi+oK/hxq4S1jtb+SnFzimGIB2tF2UF2X4 vA2Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533CRWkhz0psnBv7Om35FIL4V8TXP4FRtwShKkaT9qjpNGGA+h6B q/K2m14rLX2bBPrVZC6KvbgxPDO9eLhzXu8OZB99H7BCvEQ7MQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx9liQpfyh6sTntN0BZoLFTrp021xPL2TBZZ2iDIMjCviuwBwKs74yftj62Chm/D4GCGL8oo/TlQGfp0zXf2nE=
X-Received: by 2002:a37:557:0:b0:69c:2490:cd06 with SMTP id 84-20020a370557000000b0069c2490cd06mr5456597qkf.724.1649821186321; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 20:39:46 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20220413032759.0AEF93D48BB2@ary.qy>
In-Reply-To: <20220413032759.0AEF93D48BB2@ary.qy>
From: Seth Blank <seth@valimail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2022 20:39:35 -0700
Message-ID: <CAOZAAfNm5Mkz4YBWOXWBzwNwkD=TujdQFQkYGV2bL7gZ66eFLQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, dmarc@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c1040905dc80ed1f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/-LjWV23olPUovGCNnNRF2puLLzY>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Stats on DMARC adoption ?
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2022 03:39:53 -0000

Policies: https://dmarc.org/2022/03/dmarc-policies-up-84-for-2021/

For mailboxes that implement DMARC and send reports, Valimail (and Dmarcian
I believe) have historically tracked and published that. I'll hunt down
that data tomorrow. Off the top of my head, it was about 80% of mailboxes
globally (4bn+) properly validate DMARC, and the majority of those send
reports, with the notable exception of Microsoft, which is now finally
starting to do that.

For PSD, I don't think that's implemented anywhere at any major mailbox
provider, just in some open source libraries as a test.

Seth

On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 8:28 PM John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:

> Are there any public numbers on the amount of mail that is subject to
> DMARC policy, number of mailboxes implementing DMARC policies, number
> sending reports, stuff like that?
>
> Someone was also asking about PSD adoption but I assume at this point
> it is still zero other than some small tests.
>
> R's,
> John
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc mailing list
> dmarc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
>


-- 

*Seth Blank * | Chief Product Officer
*e:* seth@valimail.com
*p:* 415.273.8818

This email and all data transmitted with it contains confidential and/or
proprietary information intended solely for the use of individual(s)
authorized to receive it. If you are not an intended and authorized
recipient you are hereby notified of any use, disclosure, copying or
distribution of the information included in this transmission is prohibited
and may be unlawful. Please immediately notify the sender by replying to
this email and then delete it from your system.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email