IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Doing a tree walk rather than PSL lookup

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Tue, 24 November 2020 16:47 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 528713A11F0 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 08:47:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.198
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.198 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1Xb53nPlWAPH for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 08:47:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vs1-xe31.google.com (mail-vs1-xe31.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 366203A11F1 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 08:47:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vs1-xe31.google.com with SMTP id r14so11411803vsa.13 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 08:47:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=jFhnoH9gBguRHskt2wc0YfNylXZqtpM8O4hHwroA+4Y=; b=fBgsT0zujGsNBIsk8YIAyD722iaP1sc/iRpdUbJx7DeqhOh1ECP62NkEj/AdWkit+b 5IyicB+7iWYP6yvCwquviYxxAu0ZoIkBG0bgUVNx7s3f2K9qaiywrmYFF1hpFi4FLkhO xpV2SNGdWTEeAEFNfLU4mwdz8IedTiN7EVfWZ4mdPlSLp2/2ZAVGGqHNS2tJruiFAPLL W3yyU/C4BtMDKTQn66Z40tL5Lid8nTTyfjC8wVnqjza9s4ONltOzTMsDDqQu7TXlkqro wnrvbQOFLZh7xfYF18j/KNT9vlHuZCZUkLzZSMe/oOcW/Z2XPFkX4PHM7iGkp96N7tgT tdCA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=jFhnoH9gBguRHskt2wc0YfNylXZqtpM8O4hHwroA+4Y=; b=iol6jd9vNVohyyyDrO6NcZyLWlpkn8t4VLjX0bFjTGMV8AKBfCKOc0smgjC00STzZ7 mrqp9QH5YYsHpcKS64yOmLnNo2bnTeiRsgn+idy5KQlrFqhTr5zep1yWklxn/LLWAhyl 9lZAvg7EkumJkit2JzPbCnhfqdI2eX0Lemm9KNQfBspRwzGJpAKrZ63F4T1WzM4veHPb mgws15s6Thk7iC9kC3d47xMjbCRq31ELKc9IfVQttsnvUszwy1B+6cnejJ0qIWP1VcPO /dRBj0ggxbKXDSifqTN5/N7Ff6wr782QhYBYSKhUhN7qEOWJAgOWzdyG1Sn0BYrSP7f9 pYkA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532IVj/R9+dUILE9acAbKL1DWiY0XlM4iNavRb4cBUUlLrhea10w M/HxqDA36i+P363QNG/lCb9FdhFDSlyTtEHY0oI1O/Z5
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz6tZpLXykcuUtY3sXUMby0I/6dE/tLVay5um3flpjzV3I+oUMs25FewG5q5fAkKPXbDD+y5w5110C+N6Esa/w=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:783:: with SMTP id 125mr4599864vsh.15.1606236422036; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 08:47:02 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20201123213846.EB14127C8160@ary.qy> <efa0117e-5b17-800d-820d-b5d2413c6075@tana.it> <CAMSGcLBimU5NSBnxDEfSLnBkjhosrxd8_7BaTfA-A5bQyrTe1g@mail.gmail.com> <29d3b145-1652-8b62-5eb2-74993e95eb45@gmail.com> <CAHej_8k_o1yVjOP4wWR1Xz_Tuq-XA0snPAzNQeNPaApbRWy8fw@mail.gmail.com> <be400e78-091c-196c-2d7a-461050e9bab3@gmail.com> <CAHej_8mW3ENNMR7D_Jf6G5uz=EuGc3LCddtmrzVJR-GDq8Q7ow@mail.gmail.com> <4e1239c3-7b3c-1e03-4138-082be0c49dc4@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4e1239c3-7b3c-1e03-4138-082be0c49dc4@gmail.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 08:46:46 -0800
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwbPGhqXdQkG5HkjkRG23qhuSC_UT1BNNQyRiszG7Zhw3g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com>
Cc: Todd Herr <todd.herr=40valimail.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005c615105b4dd0f4a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/-NFA4w_9HanD9zaD5xlfGb-UIcQ>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Doing a tree walk rather than PSL lookup
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 16:47:04 -0000

On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 7:56 AM Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com> wrote:

> Perhaps I am misreading these, but I see them only as 'what' and 'how',
> not 'why'.  The 'why' is important.  It is often noted in our
> discussions, but seems to be missing from the spec.


Seems like something the -bis document should tackle.

-MSK

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email