IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Request to accept a new I-D into the WG work items

"John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Thu, 08 November 2018 06:57 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE281130F11 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 22:57:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=PQSxjV0O; dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=OwstNiBm
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tcUlG453d8FO for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 22:57:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21680130EF3 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 22:57:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 57531 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2018 06:57:20 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=e0b9.5be3de50.k1811; bh=8fTJEux4lrcWxWm5/ZkEvPeWTI2w0qA6jo4reJdP+4M=; b=PQSxjV0Ol95J1vyWaDjMQ/vflmvYe+HJpdNnKLHDcXPs3mOkAEJ9mQjYRojm/YT9/AN/ghZxQiDNE4U+91OZz8kEu9oPGNpz4m8VSloknnRTEOWf3UUW6AtAb7KIJ7yUukmHIU2IJwlXjEGhqtKEoYKEssERZ7UMhgxhcOu83KeTGoeaXn3mV2dpGxvV5b7ayKUEJYQ9GlwINUVSc73ZcrK4fPkd4ekBsxBCqrCtqkGUhpxL3uOsmnPZC2BoA1yy
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=e0b9.5be3de50.k1811; bh=8fTJEux4lrcWxWm5/ZkEvPeWTI2w0qA6jo4reJdP+4M=; b=OwstNiBmToPIMCQ+TYxZY9nm8rFsObJcIFUeDe3cz7+Nk5nA27UrErb1J1IZ7V8gGWBLaoHXyCXu3QQzAKJMI4e4jiXEDsP5Gne1M63DH/XjP/fpYi5rq2YgS1013Vpq+s0movthKMgimO+zN1gyUtgP02N3PIGTmxqgz9EGRxWVaKobCDQjWvToS678S5bOmB1MUCPMgWbSDLV+XZJ6UJJgQy8q/tenYmjbOfJpfcpjHH/zqZVglw7fIQcgLamR
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.2/X.509/AEAD) via TCP6; 08 Nov 2018 06:57:19 -0000
Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2018 13:57:15 +0700
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.21.1811081356470.3018@dhcp-8071.meeting.ietf.org>
From: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, "dmarc@ietf.org" <dmarc@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <B97CA494-7356-4274-B264-D5A9F2F42F65@gmail.com>
References: <0E28DA8C-09A6-4E64-AD5E-3741EFE60569@kitterman.com> <20181108061651.0AF13200829C06@dhcp-8071.meeting.ietf.org> <CABuGu1r3=Gwv1wRtohPyBqQMpQz-8-MUugZ9CTmZqi_KH3y_9A@mail.gmail.com> <0B3FC7A0-E811-4800-A5F8-ED9EBA21C79C@gmail.com> <alpine.OSX.2.21.1811081346060.3018@dhcp-8071.meeting.ietf.org> <B97CA494-7356-4274-B264-D5A9F2F42F65@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (OSX 202 2017-01-01)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/-u6ulYOUrYvgLoHBJ-0m5Bq6W04>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Request to accept a new I-D into the WG work items
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2018 06:57:26 -0000

> Agree with John but from the dns side, simpler solutions tend to get traction faster.
> John May agree with that.

Sure.  My DBOUND approach was pretty simple, using no new rrtypes or other 
magic.

>
> From my high tech gadget
>
>> On Nov 8, 2018, at 15:47, John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 8 Nov 2018, tjw ietf wrote:
>>> I remember the two hog mentioned but there could of been a third.
>>
>> At this point I can't find any of the drafts other than mine, and a problem statement mostly by Andrew Sullivan.
>>
>> In any event, I agree it's worth having the WG take a whack at this, keeping in mind that its history is not encouraging.
>>
>> R's,
>> John
>>
>>> From my high tech gadget
>>>
>>>>> On Nov 8, 2018, at 15:19, Kurt Andersen (b) <kboth@drkurt.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 1:17 PM John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:
>>>>>> In article <0E28DA8C-09A6-4E64-AD5E-3741EFE60569@kitterman.com> you write:
>>>>>> Unfortunately, I didn't come up with an idea for how to do this in DNS.  This seems like a legitimate issue
>>>>>> for the WG to work through.
>>>>>
>>>>> There were two DNS proposals in DBOUND, a more complex one from Casey
>>>>> Deccio and a simpler one from me.  Mine would certainly work for identifying
>>>>> org domains.
>>>>
>>>> I thought that there was a third one from Andrew too, but let's defer getting into the discussion until we get this proposal adopted into the WG.
>
>

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email