Re: [dmarc-ietf] Request to accept a new I-D into the WG work items

tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 08 November 2018 06:55 UTC

Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 276C2130F03 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 22:55:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rv1C43ToqQ09 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 22:55:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf1-x436.google.com (mail-pf1-x436.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::436]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0B79130F80 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 22:55:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf1-x436.google.com with SMTP id v68-v6so5290485pfk.0 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 07 Nov 2018 22:55:36 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=XhGqqr4OxQ30xf0ZOD4WnoFa5qVzKrd/xFFHYemc4Ik=; b=Qzs6ZmCmDmTPXS9b6iF0zoi1cMycNu5/d5BCPYOtP9FnMsi4oftDJHSxP4SGa3H67R S1uDty428Zc0SGeHxeT2onyXKKmGz93fyeCDC/KsDmn3a9r/ffLvy9ijG1qm0iSGxcfu MIQpcR562PuDXMPlTe2q/sIt3o0MYtVm817SU1GsAn+bRiZA9pCoejyoqXRBX3gegXqF iYndyYgGhXm50EMOsQuSc47aJreRgrLUJgX8Pv/mtsE1f0lzy8Y1gpZnhlrA6U6NjSLB 1YqcLJOEqcb3Nqw93BAo/MhROasTQQd5UtnO0t573O7It2ygqEQ+tWxTxDaftf/iIzMO 5cBw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=XhGqqr4OxQ30xf0ZOD4WnoFa5qVzKrd/xFFHYemc4Ik=; b=cNpzsDOjtiuVdLZOE60js23j8nOwpElGh6oKiRKvGRpDU/+veCRdHD8WiEbs/rLXWd /f61QlhGF02zrnzIVOFGbVBMQxAeRvszNRXb3vR7ClSRqXORC/fTX++9I+hHwP8XJ+li VjlCoW7UXQ3RUZd0QERykrc4N4YbyiNVpQmPLtInIn1eKoMGZqDsCeumWGJTFGLUk6XM utcUuw91cBXZIejlOcczwFteKmBxCbhPLaxQ02ZJdclvMPCr2XCst8JdWVgTUIIXk7Er +yqEUc+wnThJ4Ve466ME46qlZl6Ku9w9VDVuAtIjQVX2rwl/Oxzxsf9K0AxJDpIgqmw7 XUNQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gKYQ5iLqEU+KWIHRqVuWlHbVxgD8c25mpdLICtPkD8h+APC44d7 deixWJHuM55ib2vMH0/pbgtCVAkE13A=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5eaHeuDONYHvcWtAJnrsuuGA/FxX+Pg/Al0dLOnDJwxsqR63D/zIsTJ+59pxdFIIfWxrA37zw==
X-Received: by 2002:a62:5b43:: with SMTP id p64-v6mr3535674pfb.122.1541660136251; Wed, 07 Nov 2018 22:55:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.3.225] (static-222-229-224-101.adsl8.svips.gol.ne.jp. [222.229.224.101]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u76-v6sm3134185pfa.176.2018.11.07.22.55.35 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 07 Nov 2018 22:55:35 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (16A404)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.21.1811081346060.3018@dhcp-8071.meeting.ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 15:55:34 +0900
Cc: "dmarc@ietf.org" <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B97CA494-7356-4274-B264-D5A9F2F42F65@gmail.com>
References: <0E28DA8C-09A6-4E64-AD5E-3741EFE60569@kitterman.com> <20181108061651.0AF13200829C06@dhcp-8071.meeting.ietf.org> <CABuGu1r3=Gwv1wRtohPyBqQMpQz-8-MUugZ9CTmZqi_KH3y_9A@mail.gmail.com> <0B3FC7A0-E811-4800-A5F8-ED9EBA21C79C@gmail.com> <alpine.OSX.2.21.1811081346060.3018@dhcp-8071.meeting.ietf.org>
To: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/-wmcFvHqBx1OWYAHooPcdGviplo>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Request to accept a new I-D into the WG work items
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2018 06:55:43 -0000

Agree with John but from the dns side, simpler solutions tend to get traction faster. 

John May agree with that. 

From my high tech gadget

> On Nov 8, 2018, at 15:47, John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Thu, 8 Nov 2018, tjw ietf wrote:
>> I remember the two hog mentioned but there could of been a third.
> 
> At this point I can't find any of the drafts other than mine, and a problem statement mostly by Andrew Sullivan.
> 
> In any event, I agree it's worth having the WG take a whack at this, keeping in mind that its history is not encouraging.
> 
> R's,
> John
> 
>> From my high tech gadget
>> 
>>>> On Nov 8, 2018, at 15:19, Kurt Andersen (b) <kboth@drkurt.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 1:17 PM John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:
>>>>> In article <0E28DA8C-09A6-4E64-AD5E-3741EFE60569@kitterman.com> you write:
>>>>> Unfortunately, I didn't come up with an idea for how to do this in DNS.  This seems like a legitimate issue
>>>>> for the WG to work through.
>>>> 
>>>> There were two DNS proposals in DBOUND, a more complex one from Casey
>>>> Deccio and a simpler one from me.  Mine would certainly work for identifying
>>>> org domains.
>>> 
>>> I thought that there was a third one from Andrew too, but let's defer getting into the discussion until we get this proposal adopted into the WG.