Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC alignment conflicts with RFC 5322 on the use of the From and Sender header fields

Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com> Tue, 02 June 2020 22:28 UTC

Return-Path: <dcrocker@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0DD23A10A0 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 15:28:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hKn4QMdhjw3I for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 15:28:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-x336.google.com (mail-ot1-x336.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::336]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60DB13A109D for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 15:28:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-x336.google.com with SMTP id 69so280522otv.2 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 02 Jun 2020 15:28:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=mENNev/EbjQbB8n5TdtxtWBZfS1uIwznP2KJDMdR1rw=; b=Jy6aO2zrCYqu1xORMidXhyzM0+9Gvlhtc7CLVPEWFEDYh9RL3fY8gXDtObIsa6N6VV GcGvHIWmtFJ9YyQnsDOnY8d5gWg0QHh1O4ZlcsraKvyAv5SAgimlAukc3YnNUJZexEQb F+Ko7ZSBWFCyfGr4fAtpEPswpN0tFl5mC3seOobs5NqZMPUdcXHNnNAlcDcrNfH2OML+ Z7bxWVwsuf/U4U24cENsYeMSBvRzwzErQ4648c4Vjz7OtGqAhiAbf+8Za8yr7HEgg7Wl ZxkY6vyv23gkkABXMMuNPfeCmrLvgYHiBcwizk2CAWJtU8SKQPINc5AL+ZciVHWqkpzk n9XQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=mENNev/EbjQbB8n5TdtxtWBZfS1uIwznP2KJDMdR1rw=; b=j6ytpBVHU896mNn8rJQbY6wiE5BtgHTrmPKL5hlJS2xWIXFSxcnqyYodaa4ITVU0C/ C1hW7WxA2hyyx1N49SK+cnMV5qqiB2dItXfOSnp4vdkyNBDHCniCTHGzlJ8OK19bzrUS H65o+Rv+opC9AEAAUxXO6B59xkLQUbDZhNJzwm0qVVv8eaHskHJ1boV9iliNZlxbbMNY 6dWgzGVhGlJa90AsjsW1WElDbhzRqPcmN23iG+PObG3T/dB8v3zX+tl7y0L5a1mjBMKy +HjdWhSRKfI7Y26h7OHvxZbUCjH2lQOvk9YKuLqt/efenq2mEd7oPYZpuesfnY12EFiQ 1nBg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531baAZAE82ri6Bnr8QgeUyiD470dqMiVdIM+v76W9ro3TDO4+um H5DaDczeqxvi6Sjfy8FINlKRXw1+
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxlh5c12KHrNH5+qQUl5h5hzZuvdDgi7UF0AZCdr3MzjMywLUISxFMu8I4alJkohIbhsgGOTg==
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:3423:: with SMTP id v32mr1064539otb.178.1591136932549; Tue, 02 Jun 2020 15:28:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2600:1700:a3a0:4c80:74d5:2e17:a5f6:1e77? ([2600:1700:a3a0:4c80:74d5:2e17:a5f6:1e77]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a8sm50908otp.65.2020.06.02.15.28.51 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 02 Jun 2020 15:28:52 -0700 (PDT)
To: Seth Blank <seth@valimail.com>, "dmarc@ietf.org" <dmarc@ietf.org>
References: <DM5PR0601MB367115AD49513EAF3953716CF68B0@DM5PR0601MB3671.namprd06.prod.outlook.com> <18441e8d-cf87-053e-4957-7b9d6ea9690c@gmail.com> <CABa8R6s7Lh_nihfH4Y8=JFCDFL6T_iEd+dBf7C=iW+5S3K4i3A@mail.gmail.com> <1093905c-7556-ab65-ae9f-6c97d1707878@gmail.com> <CAL0qLwYm=QnSLQ_n_+xq_vvEh47TJT+HXZKem5uKhtfRotKAbQ@mail.gmail.com> <c03d4ea4-20e1-12a6-9581-f51a81330ca5@gmail.com> <CAOZAAfO42WrYi6drByD=fdoU=1su-WO6nGH0OoEN1Txw2ONNvA@mail.gmail.com> <CAOZAAfONBSuGU2DHW8XiV0J3PAP=m9zYKNT9ra_Am2QAeMUOPQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <62befcd6-c209-8f43-f713-f31fb4d16ba6@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2020 15:28:50 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAOZAAfONBSuGU2DHW8XiV0J3PAP=m9zYKNT9ra_Am2QAeMUOPQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/-yKn6YiFtA6qw_tjrKJjVFQDaIQ>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC alignment conflicts with RFC 5322 on the use of the From and Sender header fields
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2020 22:28:55 -0000

On 6/2/2020 2:42 PM, Seth Blank wrote:
> Also, from literally today: 
> https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdtx/pr/man-admits-spoof-email-fraud-scheme-and-more


Oh my. Is it really that difficult to understand the difference between 
choosing to take an action, versus being affected by your taking that 
action.


Let's keep this simple:

1. Most users do not see the domain name in the From: field.  So how 
could using a cousin domain or any other misbehavior with the domain 
name, cause the recipient to be tricked?

2. Nothing in that article demonstrates that a recipient was tricked 
into misbehavior by the presence of a problematic From: field domain name.

d/

-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net