Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-10.txt

Neil Anuskiewicz <neil@marmot-tech.com> Sun, 26 June 2022 06:17 UTC

Return-Path: <neil@marmot-tech.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C07D8C157B42 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 25 Jun 2022 23:17:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.109
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.109 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=marmot-tech.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jLTbRVAVnSOT for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 25 Jun 2022 23:17:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x642.google.com (mail-pl1-x642.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::642]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3459FC157B35 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sat, 25 Jun 2022 23:17:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x642.google.com with SMTP id jb13so5527010plb.9 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sat, 25 Jun 2022 23:17:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=marmot-tech.com; s=google1; h=content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version:subject:date:message-id :references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=rSy1ddXSy6HRypt/FMekX3/YwlUiy2utO6b1rsKj19s=; b=WyaZEZyR/voX32FDFf//dDZI+flPw6c/TO7tjT08Fp39qp7iqAu6F5JYWoVS0zMZbA jvmAdrdFZMl4PCmlRil4nPZWKqtUskSJ5y1LFMCjiN0Ctwy1u/1/piX1ZGMxE+vTRvZp W5wdA8N1PVdJFYulZTBqw79Ee0l1+bONP/phgyPtD2JSEa3Kmdr4mrx3W28UWUHJJzyA +E6gHFKnmNlvT4OqENzYxc93q7VYqwW/IJ6qCg8LVOTADjoMPe61Ea6ZhWL+SBqLa3X4 bKuBAMwt+rq+YUaXCPv+6+Z0YsXlrzD8EdlGRgz+CNMOZtg9dO4F8DjB9ZD7S/GIjYuJ nTGA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version :subject:date:message-id:references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=rSy1ddXSy6HRypt/FMekX3/YwlUiy2utO6b1rsKj19s=; b=buGl0oDTBtW0EA94zGDZQytCfAEE94JSuLG47C8YkgDflAS7iPB2SDqc6X659VyqWK J1HlXDOrj5BQkIjek6AyXIgUIVlyqTDYCOh2JtYuSdRLWjICSEiVkNA9ZX06EJe+zsFl rxNeFp2D4/zlB6Kcv6thu44es05xqDojnZEz1VvQNV6+SH+w4x5DkyDloL1CXHzV/WMR K28l8LpqlDTfJ26K59DVQkGCAw3URPmzbZTxh/Y51UCHDRwwHdGyVb+3QT39c9PgV1qk BkVN8qFoLRDUb2+A6d4KfPT9m+To+O5lOUavy8zoUE5Ncj1zikn4B2pgBH/XRFFgkfKW uyIg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora/ekOEb7M7djKOoLeP1PognwUtY11IXnnvQDF8cbQGpU0qufzSG NU/LnPKJ4y7Q26oURbyJ5KT/AqrpycS4JctoDNw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1v38TBUMh7nkdqkY/XKy00jY31wS4E20tPjipupo1QxKIUG+S8AAARioGjp1nfEN5wbIXknpg==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:22c9:b0:16a:749b:16d6 with SMTP id y9-20020a17090322c900b0016a749b16d6mr7858883plg.32.1656224229592; Sat, 25 Jun 2022 23:17:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([2601:1c0:cb02:fad0:e9d1:c7f:724f:8e92]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p23-20020a1709028a9700b00167621bd70esm4622801plo.130.2022.06.25.23.17.08 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 25 Jun 2022 23:17:09 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Neil Anuskiewicz <neil@marmot-tech.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2022 23:17:08 -0700
Message-Id: <4AB0CD7B-BB08-486A-A97E-E80A146B05D0@marmot-tech.com>
References: <165607949956.34604.5446505073716107562@ietfa.amsl.com>
Cc: i-d-announce@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <165607949956.34604.5446505073716107562@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (19F77)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/01gKy_5sExjEsM-sLPyswC9wA2o>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-10.txt
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2022 06:17:14 -0000

> On Jun 24, 2022, at 7:05 AM, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance WG of the IETF.
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis/
> 
> There is also an HTML version available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-10.html
> 
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-10
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts

I think this most recent version was much easier to understand than a previous version I’d read a few months ago. This iterative process of discussion, Kaizen, and working toward rough consensus does work.

I’m commenting on the noticeable (to me at least) improvements in the quality of the drafts, not on the substantive issues.

Also, with dissenters stating their cases and advocates staying in there and not running, those of us observing the process can feel confident about the ultimate outcomes.

And a side effect is that observers can learn the technical aspects and observe the process in real time.

Good work!

Neil