Re: [dmarc-ietf] Nonexistent Domain Policy was: Re: Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd

[Scott Kitterman <[e-mail]>]

On Saturday, July 13, 2019 3:34:51 PM EDT Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Friday, July 12, 2019 2:28:39 PM EDT Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > On Friday, July 12, 2019 1:54:57 PM EDT Kurt Andersen (b) wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 10:50 AM Scott Kitterman <[e-mail]>
> > > 
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday, June 26, 2019 5:21:14 PM EDT Seth Blank wrote:
> > > > > 3. If an np= tag is needed to allow PSD functioning for only
> > > > > NXDOMAINs
> > > > 
> > > > The limited feedback during WGLC has been favorable to this.
> > > > 
> > > > This will require a rather larger change to the document than the
> > > > other
> > > > issues, but they are manageable and I believe I have most of the
> > > > relevant
> > > > text
> > > > from earlier revisions.
> > > > 
> > > > I think we should include this.
> > > 
> > > I am much more concerned with adding another tag that can only be used
> > > in
> > > a
> > > PSD-DMARC record. I would be much more open to make a "normative" change
> > > to
> > > the DMARC tag list (RFC 7489 section 11.4) to define np for any DMARC
> > > record, than to make this a special case for PSD-DMARC records.
> > 
> > I agree.  My intent is to add the tag to be used experimentally for any
> > DMARC record.  Part of the experiment is to see if it's useful beyond PSD.
> 
> Attached is my proposed text to add the np tag.  Based on the discussion to
> date, I assume I'll be asked to add something like this after last call is
> complete, so please let me know how to make it better.
> 
> Scott K

Updated rfcdiff attached.  The only change other than typos is to add mention 
of 'np' to Appendix A.

Scott K