Re: [dmarc-ietf] PSD DMARC: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd post-WGLC Status

Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com> Fri, 04 October 2019 22:01 UTC

Return-Path: <sklist@kitterman.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19F67120052 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 15:01:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.991
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.991 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_HTML_ATTACH=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (unsupported algorithm ed25519-sha256)" header.d=kitterman.com header.b=gmVaQu6C; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kitterman.com header.b=C8vzySUo
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SW2gkLRBtTba for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 15:01:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from interserver.kitterman.com (interserver.kitterman.com [64.20.48.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 039F712006B for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 15:01:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from interserver.kitterman.com (interserver.kitterman.com [IPv6:2604:a00:6:1039:225:90ff:feaa:b169]) by interserver.kitterman.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3B95F80284 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 18:01:15 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kitterman.com; i=@kitterman.com; q=dns/txt; s=201903e; t=1570226475; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : from; bh=7xrpD1sT0565OrSSxQyCcmpLsU7YztQJ/05jaWVWaxo=; b=gmVaQu6Cjb5IVs3KRzZ1qpRhvMnS/LA9G8rC1Sxxs4BTQU9yjLsVBaFm r+qiej/TjH177tIJ+Ga3zJaB0NnmAg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kitterman.com; i=@kitterman.com; q=dns/txt; s=201903r; t=1570226475; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : from; bh=7xrpD1sT0565OrSSxQyCcmpLsU7YztQJ/05jaWVWaxo=; b=C8vzySUoNsZYf30sVVrPA8gS12fWb7+wn7Td0bV8JxVxqh9JlFVIas/f wsPLTLGWSDY167KeDWzRXbDfzVzaYPvKqiWC/0+4Vp7CWGUg9S85e6PDnZ MLMuGMeptZHDMSq5ADIop8QUy3AkC5Ow+vUQL5mHEKCRDg5wTCrTLwo/Mt jai9y6bXDSDePutcPWsmZO8aj3ZVCM3MnJwFWr3MVFShO+/nK1C6gPZH01 l1kn2YM830Zd4c8/fTdJ5PMBMh4C4XCnyBcFQbYoigGLr/ptwfwJt+ZJUM h3D2PblbfV9KS1Dlrw4Hng5FXBpdmYdFMXJQWjLfQ3m8eJbneKVP1w==
Received: from l5580.localnet (static-72-81-252-22.bltmmd.fios.verizon.net [72.81.252.22]) by interserver.kitterman.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 327EEF801A6 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 18:01:15 -0400 (EDT)
From: Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2019 18:01:14 -0400
Message-ID: <1960529.BQ9LHqgqYc@l5580>
In-Reply-To: <2080369.Hr1xgu6sVx@l5580>
References: <2080369.Hr1xgu6sVx@l5580>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="nextPart2086774.9YeHt4G8mN"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/0dgRJMRuTtnQp-R759WxQh4l4ek>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] PSD DMARC: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd post-WGLC Status
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2019 22:01:49 -0000

On Saturday, September 28, 2019 5:38:37 PM EDT Scott Kitterman wrote:
> Based on the post-WGLC discussion, I believe an updated draft before IETF
> last call is appropriate with three changes:
> 
> 1.  Updated Longest PSD definition:
> > 2.3.  Longest PSD
> > 
> > The longest PSD is the Organizational Domain with one label removed.
> 
> 2.  Addition of the PSL data format to Appendix B (it would be B.3).  I
> haven't drafted text yet, but I don't expect it to be controverisial.
> 
> 3.  Add zdkimfilter to Appendix C (also didn't make text yet).
> 
> Unless someone tells me otherwise, I plan to go ahead with those changes.

I've done this now.  I've attached the latest rfcdiff from -06.  If you want to 
review the entire draft as it stands, it's available in the WG GitHub 
repository:

https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ietf-dmarc-wg/draft-ietf-dmarc-psd/master/
draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-07.txt

Please let me know if I missed something or if the new text could be improved.

Scott K