Re: [dmarc-ietf] error report in 7.2.2
John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Mon, 25 January 2021 20:50 UTC
Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 353353A183B for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 12:50:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=HZ7N5DEn; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=28L8daVH
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J18XgUMlqLfZ for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 12:50:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91D9F3A189A for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 12:50:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 10667 invoked from network); 25 Jan 2021 20:50:52 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=29a3.600f2f2c.k2101; bh=URFtBpy4C/V7cf697/a+OK7ULhCR1iBAjuq8KzYcd7M=; b=HZ7N5DEnGpO2uP3OF3O52q69CNqaLO9vD1KajuKMOG/4KUtaTJyAgT/S3C7S4EKOuv7pGnih1rl+97y/MyCqk8VV+xXdWMA9vz+W6E58n/hS0D9KvJHDBZNRbvEomIkZDG5lEpCd1ilBZZFckLzeZpcPiQ2IdlWAD70WdXV3QJJ0KSqE/+itxaUo03Ax4QFj6QFL5bF0siU2Y2JvW+vKeKh1HB85+RIEPY25D9yXVM2E1hfGkCJapCI+VVoB2dyqD8xBnWrNTaQX4kOPRcFikEziE95DI6DnizJ79eBF89axrJiSP/mknqiVQQmy/ah9C4eG3hWrUw8i8eQwic9d2A==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=29a3.600f2f2c.k2101; bh=URFtBpy4C/V7cf697/a+OK7ULhCR1iBAjuq8KzYcd7M=; b=28L8daVHJ+/Mrcsk51+tUwbIj8fh0E69+etg7D5f9air8G5GtrAciYJ9Or4C39TQra+QNfPXvSUpmB8rER8iLslap7RXzNRViueg33z+E3dIkvuIKQISvmX/EvhymNQ7XZj1iMAPMpbky5FLu0Du4MhqZDFb8JLFh8BHKLlg4vkhjhQ7ZjOrpoAbLkywZMI1jRdk2pkABZvh/9xplVfsClShwirS28ma/95uFy1A3rXrJ6CPIYmeVhF1CRQw9icBikRgfXWi2HxlmllV6Q7NV7M/bSbkKdEiRTJG6TVKn2mufDGEBkBdjIS3mxx8SldFuNxO66LcJxY8RgDCzkHogQ==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.2 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 25 Jan 2021 20:50:52 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id B43B46C143FF; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 15:50:51 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ary.qy (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23E956C143E1; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 15:50:51 -0500 (EST)
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 15:50:51 -0500
Message-ID: <54b1c5c9-34c4-7c90-952e-3b2ed0aca2b0@taugh.com>
From: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>, "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Cc: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <2c814e81-9094-c0d1-7244-847a978a340a@tana.it>
References: <ed9b7f7f-2737-257f-8148-d94a7c1d383@taugh.com> <CAL0qLwbax6rkJuVhN50nLP=QV0dBkCM0272ZmFD7qQG1XPrbiA@mail.gmail.com> <2c814e81-9094-c0d1-7244-847a978a340a@tana.it>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/0s9yKSkEG1YQ0kYgVbDn_gQOr4A>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] error report in 7.2.2
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 20:50:55 -0000
On Mon, 25 Jan 2021, Alessandro Vesely wrote: >>> Does anyone send the error reports described in section 7.2.2 ? I've >>> never seen one but my reports are all quite small. >> >> I've never seen one. I imagine the logic goes something like "I was able >> to at least submit the report to the submission server, so that's that." > > "An attempt MUST be made to send this report to all listed "mailto" URIs", > seems to also include the one which bounced. If you look at the last para in 7.2.1, the intention is also to tell recipients that you have a report but it is too big. That's more what I was wondering about. If nobody else has seen error reports, perhaps we could deprecate them. Regards, John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
- [dmarc-ietf] error report in 7.2.2 John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] error report in 7.2.2 Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] error report in 7.2.2 Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] error report in 7.2.2 John R Levine