Re: [dmarc-ietf] From: rewriting, was Email standard revision

"Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com> Mon, 02 December 2019 17:21 UTC

Return-Path: <kurta@drkurt.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA587120849 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 09:21:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=drkurt.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0LagxhKFv0r0 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 09:21:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io1-xd35.google.com (mail-io1-xd35.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58385120817 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 09:21:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io1-xd35.google.com with SMTP id x1so139247iop.7 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 09:21:02 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=drkurt.com; s=20130612; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=oTfDMpDWI3JqpFjFO1FQ/bhO5Dji3LjL/ITzABnsuQA=; b=fxi1AuDQokinha1kktQNOckoR7OaxAoyRoG/kUdo2Nm/WyYCCwyPMBZf6lW377hleZ 6egrAI89Jg7uWxD8n20v09/5ztkoGxq8VbCU6OUObXzYIHorgjsYDWVdLmPD6MfX/gnd ie5LSRSZOefWQV0d9Biz6NRm2R08erL8bCVR8=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=oTfDMpDWI3JqpFjFO1FQ/bhO5Dji3LjL/ITzABnsuQA=; b=q5wKTyQt+hUQZuVYateK8nb+i9iFBGaaVGJ3lqKgq1hMf+xQvH+tZdwW+EwIuFTQM4 dyZUpPCLp6q4O6J7k3RgcbsojPKFiIID9vxL9qupO/P6gNS1EDx06UuD5OMLZugDVuzf aGRWTL/87hfFOo7I+8T14mQWaK0q+AKeURAdhu6qIyV6u701P3kBsE182oMxtEhfCYAY cZxTrQhYUUz0xTYJ2vZv4zmuWW5Ber35agLoZvyfqnOvwdGExcNj0SY9K1A7b448/uwO HrHpFqgdAuiT6CORJ7e1rk7i7rYajj7G3fhwkTUcXQFZZbt1khZy7xajC3anP6yRs4J1 MJLA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWLX4yuuaKD0Fp9ksLZ8BaYwQoqI496Ze2h4dkB1m+4udqFSUTb pC5aXL3Q/8xD/9cpBQqhOPR4BLrEbKzf3aZZ6qtOvg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxUidYOpRhm82K9fG0RUU78MqRLhPJklEBQdVDjTZGFhSuvnWEDvnJDXOYrgdU3Va/LCSLTRQ/47D3VC0Ly1kQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:94ca:: with SMTP id y10mr57546075ior.104.1575307261297; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 09:21:01 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <458060E1B9558124988A46B7@PSB> <f741b82b-3314-47e1-b0cf-ab491ffa14a6@www.fastmail.com> <2E5DE6BD20354824E99E564F@PSB> <84F1134E-5031-46BB-8C78-9E76FF971100@episteme.net> <A39990063436871E76405B96@JcK-HP5.jck.com> <79130263-06d5-6a63-e6c6-81b67695eb48@tana.it> <b18f3646-8733-f921-4e38-33543aef489f@gmail.com> <CABuGu1r6DVaK4uFgw_BTwpFAd3kN1G4fjPRw7JLCTAve=aRb5g@mail.gmail.com> <9dc4e992-db54-a9b9-edca-629e3285a1a7@gmail.com> <457C81343E3DB1B1D58910E4@PSB>
In-Reply-To: <457C81343E3DB1B1D58910E4@PSB>
From: "Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2019 09:20:46 -0800
Message-ID: <CABuGu1qbPJaYJvyEuRyqNQRCvbTnSvqr8Je+kTrV0wrG0wQLEQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
Cc: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com>, Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>, dmarc-ietf <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000b8f0c50598bbcd98"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/0zSX4eWn5xotC9ZrGVLKi3RRT6E>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] From: rewriting, was Email standard revision
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2019 17:21:06 -0000

On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 9:11 AM John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> wrote:

>
> --On Monday, December 2, 2019 08:29 -0800 Dave Crocker
> <dcrocker@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On 12/2/2019 7:56 AM, Kurt Andersen (b) wrote:
> >> There's also already RFC7960 which expands upon 5598 with
> >> specific  reference to DMARC's impact.
> >
> > ahh. thanks.
> >
> > It will help to have folk comment on the IETF mailing list, so
> > that Klensin's comments don't just get responses from me.
>
> Unfortunately, 7960 does not explicitly update 5598, so that
> relationship is difficult for anyone not heavily involved to
> discover (that neither Dave nor I was aware of the relationship
> is probably symptomatic).  This may eventually call for an
> update that replaces both documents or may further justify a
> more or less comprehensive Applicability Statement for the core
> email protocols.


In this regard I think that something like Hector's "practitioner's guide"
(probably as a BCP rather than a protocol standard) would be immensely
helpful and meet this need. Maybe we need to look for making a trilogy of
docs rather than just a duet: *21, *22, *23 :-)

--Kurt