Re: [dmarc-ietf] if policy quarantine will be kept
"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Thu, 01 August 2019 03:34 UTC
Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72F28120136 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 20:34:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2MfmyTRA_5dp for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 20:34:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x135.google.com (mail-lf1-x135.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::135]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6568A120131 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 20:34:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x135.google.com with SMTP id c9so49010904lfh.4 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 20:34:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=4hiEqBriTgOmYWgDCDO7VgvdFDViFuy2FXY5r/5eCHM=; b=nnZg8P5Ur1lklGvLSiSO8cVeC8JvlOIYWNZHPDphw4RGjqWJshPW7Ldh+njZ2Yt6QK 8cK+5MlhrwgzwrZLDybrPjTfnlUKD+cj9p7BvYdo3lE/lHBKU3HluV1SRRrhmSdQ9qEM CMWjZ4kLIhy1mcjKUJLc68Y+lbYv90yt1WCvQhIzatmt9BUywMFqYD3p/Zk6BkXpyEez vQK5YzG3w5M10YQcpLfBXI7sJC4iExHioguK4uz+InZyekDt+ChcF5nDumCgZkMCGX9P edo6h2Jzuyau7XysSBf+Rit012gDYqhppsZKoPi+hIQMmqfKXgGUckzOT2g9+Pwx1x6j Gm4A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=4hiEqBriTgOmYWgDCDO7VgvdFDViFuy2FXY5r/5eCHM=; b=PdEgrf21rbuXAs8JS5xFeS8uw7tkfHcniPSs+nkalrXh/RFs9wGhYfmhaGs5QyvdUF pWwXHgME8LpMz+A6c+eZysE7+YrKEGDQF7EcWp39e5U1w8ezKas8CANHLzyT3/KF1LAk qiKayRIScmhIKFQ2cNm+V0Sbx5C+X4jROYNKUxapeBLfk35vY2/4uoa2HX53Aol2IEzz /6Q4nlUUf/nIOmz0eKWthKwufoSzNI0rzfMLNUmJoQmOaKNevQMVJNfYZ89ilK7xCbmK Lqh+g9p1KE7fQG3/Snzqq7YIBiyNUqfBeAKELpJcXNOTJsFERzh/qwJeUEZRZ3p9xzSM mvrg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVmMCMqev4nSJEH/04DZ1ut2k6BGAclUYEZVO6zN4+aTjNBpG2z FTGrSYulQUL9c9Kf17zbcAySSSrgZTtPDJcp83RqAA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwXiiWJf/m3G03hVumDeIwxP45edA+2Hpe9E8L/AvoGHE6v8mLUuO59hpOrH4ymlU59CugrBdk0KLg43TvIcXI=
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:4a78:: with SMTP id q24mr16483573lfp.59.1564630479572; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 20:34:39 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <187a4f8129f624d5590b553aff40489c8d24fb97.camel@aegee.org>
In-Reply-To: <187a4f8129f624d5590b553aff40489c8d24fb97.camel@aegee.org>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 20:34:25 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwb5604tMk_pHsJZNspHib-BVuZ2bMjOX_QqhMJSe8Q4ww@mail.gmail.com>
To: Дилян Палаузов <dilyan.palauzov@aegee.org>
Cc: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f09255058f05eb43"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/183Sv2Af2CXgmKm5DP4J6bugJMw>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] if policy quarantine will be kept
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2019 03:34:45 -0000
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 7:29 AM Дилян Палаузов <dilyan.palauzov@aegee.org> wrote: > if policy quarantine will be kept, I propose including this text in the > specification: > > Messages, subject to the quarantine policy, directed to a single recipient > that does not support the concept of > quarantining, can be either accepted and delivered, accepted and > discarded, or rejected. > > Messages, subject to the quarantine policy, directed to many recipients, > some of which support the concept of > quarantining, and the others not supporting this concept, can be either: > * accepted, quarantined for the first group of recipients and discarded > for the other recipients, > * accepted, quarantined for the first group of recipients and delivered to > the other recipients, > * segmented or > * rejected as whole > Doesn't this, as proposed, require different receivers to know each other's capabilities? -MSK
- [dmarc-ietf] if policy quarantine will be kept Дилян Палаузов
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] if policy quarantine will be kept Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] if policy quarantine will be kept Дилян Палаузов