Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #55 - Clarify legal and privacy implications of failure reports

[Michael Thomas <[e-mail]>]

On 12/29/20 12:59 PM, John Levine wrote:
> In article <[e-mail]> you write:
>> On 12/29/20 12:10 PM, John Levine wrote:
>>> A lot of tiny non-profits like Girl Scout troops use email addresses
>>> at webmail providers and send their announcements through ESPs like
>>> Constant Contact and Mailchimp.  This is yet another situation where
>>> DMARC can't describe an entirely normal mail setup.
>>>
>>> Constant Contact apparently got Yahoo to give them a signing key,
>>> at least temporarily, but that doesn't scale.
>> What gmail does for gsuite is generates (or not, who knows) a key and
>> gives you the selector to add to your dns. I don't see why that doesn't
>> scale for all situations.
> To point out the obvious, because they use a single address at
> yahoo.com or gmail.com or hotmail.com, not a private domain. These are
> tiny organizations that don't have a lot of computer expertise nor a
> lot of need for it.

Um, so? The have to procure a domain too which can be technically 
challenging. If they want to use outsourced email, the outsourced email 
provider should provide the support to get their selector into their 
DNS.  If they can't bother, I don't care if their email isn't delivered.

Mike