[dmarc-ietf] Introduction context was: Re: Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd

Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com> Fri, 12 July 2019 17:26 UTC

Return-Path: <sklist@kitterman.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1513120370 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 10:26:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (unsupported algorithm ed25519-sha256)" header.d=kitterman.com header.b=Y/Jzl4bR; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kitterman.com header.b=ar8jXR9y
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5tvwYafZdPzl for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 10:26:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from interserver.kitterman.com (interserver.kitterman.com [64.20.48.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1C86120311 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 10:26:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from interserver.kitterman.com (interserver.kitterman.com [64.20.48.66]) by interserver.kitterman.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBD9BF8071F for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 13:26:40 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kitterman.com; i=@kitterman.com; q=dns/txt; s=201903e; t=1562952400; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding : content-type : from; bh=FadgnU7DWl+qqJAt4CUQiR51vqOY5/ueQT6RAfyocGM=; b=Y/Jzl4bR081WOBUlX7qjJMMDtEjZ+dcLINtCS/kq99FyYNVKA8bXbhsm vTpzAFJPu7F9Dx2n2axQG/nCy/meCA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kitterman.com; i=@kitterman.com; q=dns/txt; s=201903r; t=1562952400; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding : content-type : from; bh=FadgnU7DWl+qqJAt4CUQiR51vqOY5/ueQT6RAfyocGM=; b=ar8jXR9yfxG6Or/oKQpwT1LcYD3pudzsXlb5D6uCgvCK9T9+o2UEUFVH /o+T9d+uu3YLrdQWS1dd7pNb/ijLC5ObQCI+meO7t7LJGM2U+W6MJbjFvR /DxHdGToooNqWNb50HM2BGZuznI6kEseZN2PY7IB97V1GVi0G2uyjkFks0 eCswLrxO6Kn4jaGT53A6fV07MWOhd2gYGba/bCzQNlM99E6+tV1AXTuThA ugERwevq2LhP/jyy2bl3PrqgK2eZycVcjULK6p4sEZmXatuOyLEdwBuwwd lMk7pBRh4Zl1HliqirhIT+9biLlq8SH2uvz/sWIy+eeW57scjWI/SA==
Received: from l5580.localnet (static-72-81-252-22.bltmmd.fios.verizon.net [72.81.252.22]) by interserver.kitterman.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9CBCEF80607 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 13:26:40 -0400 (EDT)
From: Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 13:26:40 -0400
Message-ID: <1890995.riJRFoXRoW@l5580>
In-Reply-To: <CAOZAAfN0+nxpN1P_nk3y5f8MTQ=c7DYNvYic2iDMuCK_bNa=qg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAL0qLwbbz_UhBLsURg=eXhRBC2g9OghiN==T9Uq9pFuLtd=b7w@mail.gmail.com> <CAOZAAfN0+nxpN1P_nk3y5f8MTQ=c7DYNvYic2iDMuCK_bNa=qg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/1SQepBrIiszecB3kHafKdcFXYFI>
Subject: [dmarc-ietf] Introduction context was: Re: Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 17:26:43 -0000

On Wednesday, June 26, 2019 5:21:14 PM EDT Seth Blank wrote:
> As Secretary, there are three items that have not yet reached consensus
> that must be resolved during WGLC:
> 
> 1. What further context is needed in the introduction

The only comment on this so far during WGLC is that it is clear as is.

As the document author, this is one I have a hard time assessing.  It's clear 
to me, but I know what I meant when I wrote it.  If anyone is still concerned 
about this issue, I would strong encourage you to provide suggested text.

I think the WG should be pretty open to accepting such changes (as long as 
they are technically accurate).  Even if it makes the document a bit longer, I 
think clarity is worth it.

Standing by for inputs/feedback.

Scott K