Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC vs reject

John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Mon, 07 December 2020 19:20 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A47843A0816 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Dec 2020 11:20:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.851
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.851 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=egfdemXr; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=MW1Exrlw
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q2FKRhli98SN for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Dec 2020 11:20:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C25453A084D for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Dec 2020 11:20:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 94607 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2020 19:20:00 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=17186.5fce8060.k2012; bh=x0wt2LKelK32d5mkFeYsceHufhrUOREnd/xXdUFFgCc=; b=egfdemXrwmjvtzVlwoeWUofbmom0yMOsWseE0SAo9feLUTr+Mxcsenknt9CJFAePIZDM/DCarUHA59OsLI8T0IIYWdtadPB1x6ysDGQXvRkuVMhhQDjs/frNGBNXePM5jabYB+mgcw9hr1ptwMUtspbqT+R1fjH0tfMJA9Qo9wi55R7klgHkzlWe0yWkqGO4wHszIKvScnETcqJTTM1YUU/V2dkQ3os1je6OvHUmDvYQydcWSe5XuHvSGq8gf7UZ4vKbwQyVNQrwHVSHL8TiFrPwPiP4Prm5KuM+dUfEyy/lg8UftBS9Uw0ErSUooMvJH0/I2fUrRZw7lg2tTYFWvQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=17186.5fce8060.k2012; bh=x0wt2LKelK32d5mkFeYsceHufhrUOREnd/xXdUFFgCc=; b=MW1ExrlwTZGzPkVRnjMc0xJJUSRN9PIjYGHIV1YQ0nc8YjXA1ks7Mk3LNOChv2YBpavEEXuJKrOrXkOmsRHn9d03OH28yll2a4mkaYMFI8zZ2D5NvcDDCRCR61xeatF0OtOPSd2iE/cSJDQHFGEximeTz6QL703yVrLeETFmZqhLgvaHwEjahR6xlzU2tun5PZqtTOdzMS+jqr8U2a+6XnNcRWY23kHTlecu2VjZBaKGql5WhxHz0c6kNydQ6P8drkqGsWVkCr/7bKIQEJVjOHscZlp+1LF5wUC0GhbitgJNUdfLLuNfg6Y1QSf9oF7gckiPSMvoN0552kJSatwyJw==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.2 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 07 Dec 2020 19:19:59 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id 6D772292166A; Mon, 7 Dec 2020 14:19:59 -0500 (EST)
Date: 7 Dec 2020 14:19:59 -0500
Message-Id: <20201207191959.6D772292166A@ary.qy>
From: "John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Cc: vesely@tana.it
In-Reply-To: <b069e7c1-51a8-4550-76a9-c7e78f04c780@tana.it>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Cleverness: minimal
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/1_AY6q4skfX3kazKD7CLiTrV9a8>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC vs reject
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2020 19:20:10 -0000

In article <b069e7c1-51a8-4550-76a9-c7e78f04c780@tana.it> you write:
>    Compared with the use of "l=" tag (Section 8.2 of [RFC6376]), the
>    fact that footers are written in plain text ...

They are?  Some are, some are added as MIME parts.

We really need to keep in mind that there is a lot of list management
software with a vast array of configuration options.

R's,
John