Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-12.txt

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Tue, 13 April 2021 01:08 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1672F3A19D7 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 18:08:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 05pCFLBPyRkK for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 18:08:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vs1-xe2f.google.com (mail-vs1-xe2f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e2f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C1A53A19C7 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 18:08:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vs1-xe2f.google.com with SMTP id b18so2516094vso.7 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 18:08:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=B7NSJ2TkPN8B+jx7BYyxAQJh4wM8czZZ/P4rUf8GGPE=; b=Q9GHpGKdWYXSUukdnsTbl5P2jBqeGiLqi5ZYp2udmwVbH9pYAWVYfG7jdDVAnlUFGV wEIr5JrNuw1R44psqsKpIOQPgEAo5leoyew8T2tUvwSbCDwE/8ZQ4zodzdpQCSJZFKmn +FlP5m6hBnJmI8+QAJvXpsWi5kqIZqlkEwd63HehTGtsGDtZ+FwQ3JZvhNvQYflR9pet QHvPS5tUu5bJiRdQQm/27BCv/p3NyRpvvrVo2Lnsy5bmmOZRMiMflNsuF1ldZF1v81j9 rJDIPicnKucMYsf7krkWgwVUuEvnum7HbECxV/rIim0mqT7NhFWNdvHoZS5WHst18T1m Uhuw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=B7NSJ2TkPN8B+jx7BYyxAQJh4wM8czZZ/P4rUf8GGPE=; b=cUVSSkMlvfxA8oT3iw30F8mJLLiLVl74ZyS1+M1fyQ3paSOFBtMooKQIV8FM9K7esj FMLQKV5olpMtOQjX8au60PPBUod35iyN+o5nS+FcKtuodiHkJNrX8YJ5/EDP0ddPnMEX 8byewQmue7RsO6w4QP496e2aH+UnxeJto3sssm2LDZxBZz5buVN5W/RS5YhYBmUgb5ah 2dfBaUGGKDkeNL8s7QeN6opmFOEvv2pnvaYHviqX/hUZXykdArZFLTfhwCT8Gp+/cg90 k/DUe4HTf8iFCOQ4eDrPeBrHTt7XHt6ZaowqedcjALKIfDg4m9ELpO3cjPpiqU66HMA+ HExA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532S0YH93qWTRIkJvbo5y2tF4l04//mFqBdSg69aRjYFTLnYXkKR u46r08Z5SapRb9BwlzdWwIS//WLzYK1S1vTEqhtQbhIVxao=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwvAa3azyCov8M9ap48YUpwssTjlBrF6cSSnj+16DXAUVGRGQqzAeVHIG99y0MOEuqbNrvEj6r6UHSUKe0NJnY=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:4c6:: with SMTP id 189mr22137585vse.0.1618276110447; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 18:08:30 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <161826631429.14511.7031457134724901407@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <161826631429.14511.7031457134724901407@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 18:08:19 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwZsJ7SqYPLcJi8+fg=tLEUTSh0X5w8J-CjNdiz8dzeVGg@mail.gmail.com>
To: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000b6376805bfd044f5"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/20JvKnr94apb5u8hUjL4hHVjbtw>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-12.txt
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 01:08:42 -0000

On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 3:25 PM <internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote:

>
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Domain-based Message Authentication,
> Reporting & Conformance WG of the IETF.
>
>         Title           : Experimental DMARC Extension For Public Suffix
> Domains
>         Authors         : Scott Kitterman
>                           Tim Wicinski
>         Filename        : draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-12.txt
>         Pages           : 14
>         Date            : 2021-04-12
>
> Abstract:
>    Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Conformance
>    (DMARC) permits a domain-controlling organization to express domain-
>    level policies and preferences for message validation, disposition,
>    and reporting, which a mail-receiving organization can use to improve
>    mail handling.
>
>    DMARC distinguishes the portion of a name that is a Public Suffix
>    Domain (PSD), below which organizational domain names are created.
>    The basic DMARC capability allows organizational domains to specify
>    policies that apply to their subdomains, but it does not give that
>    capability to PSDs.  This document describes an extension to DMARC to
>    fully enable DMARC functionality for PSDs.
>
>    Some implementations of DMARC consider a PSD to be ineligible for
>    DMARC enforcement.  This specification addresses that case.
> [...]
>

Thanks.  This is now in IESG Evaluation and will probably make the next
telechat (on the 22nd).

-MSK