IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] "Missed it by *that* much". . .

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Fri, 17 March 2017 07:43 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60ECA124D6C for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 00:43:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KI_iaak7y0ka for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 00:43:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x22c.google.com (mail-vk0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 591C11243FE for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 00:43:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id d188so36600173vka.0 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 00:43:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=oSGxHxHHz8uODD4Tf4a/FSplmQN94icQeuS0o+HbDjU=; b=hE5X32z8+99ra/QLVX/Q0Pmn13v0T/Y4Vef/o+jZBm7rnIgv7aFYZeDnrxGed1D8IH 1aTAL+yuuMrQiNqm5APBt0d8RHH+9uzaRZmpJ0GxQ3BbEbnIAvV8lZzwTZOkIhKxvvyv x1q6AD9phh/NEAaWbgH6qBAc4YtCupVsu6ReBsnOh7Nu4s/ZMRdlYdM9AKJFMk2L5fu7 HVZBz7tV12TBQZWdTEr8fs6GrjBKPDqLWw5fA/qP05jFu19ddDH1DtwheuTa6axBZGCa iukg/g9FluEzQ4B0xQIJsIN6FhKUEqqd/YfeDt3PgnILny+kBO1g0lJZVItXI9aHPBjn kDXA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=oSGxHxHHz8uODD4Tf4a/FSplmQN94icQeuS0o+HbDjU=; b=O717VCJvdK7VZc23V7gQSgf5MSzOSVd97B/fTpHzE6OJpVS5Ak+eea/Uk5wJjzO3uw meAeQIZg/Hn35gcoWASG3tJ6ivaHznJUW8dops0Q3oo66qmHsKfsdkV5CUGthFIgDdVk AREUMY0YVg+9WkSfpJvu76rAQnjXPeTANVhnZ0NwlkbUV6AJEXg+mIjX5V7TSeJNlaaz NT6pFXzglCehqCTBtSUXr+/UH7Oa7p+erjDm0ZqUu3QtOqVt8zN0JR8maZ5+bG2K/Fje 30fzpKx863rJz7loK/x7Ae7b8f5fPshFOmMjdacUyfCdn/+NR6WJVk+3Pn9DfhujFt1E f/9w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H2r9ZPhxuIo8Bd0BBDDnDu/ZsmZl/QahEhtera0k1r+LnWOipgO8BTs0yDpFX8qH3/RDTUV4jQim8j4Dg==
X-Received: by 10.31.33.75 with SMTP id h72mr5285311vkh.26.1489736606466; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 00:43:26 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.103.147.13 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 00:43:25 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CACnuoxVZF-RNgwyeajbwa17_JPC6VxUGT5xzeZsUvQB6nHgyDA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CACnuoxVZF-RNgwyeajbwa17_JPC6VxUGT5xzeZsUvQB6nHgyDA@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 00:43:25 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwZDCbP2tWAp6RH38jTdkZueH8WPTbwd6Kfjk6Y0csZEXg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Kurt Andersen <kandersen@linkedin.com>
Cc: "dmarc@ietf.org" <dmarc@ietf.org>, Seth Blank <seth@valimail.com>, Steve Jones <smj@crash.com>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c01bca3cf79f054ae85591"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/2Hzy35ojkdHjlKciBIlbl0YoNII>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] "Missed it by *that* much". . .
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 07:43:29 -0000

On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Kurt Andersen <kandersen@linkedin.com>
wrote:

> I discovered today as I attempted to submit the ARC protocol update that
> I've been working on, that the submission system closed about 40 hours
> earlier - sigh.
>
> Since I'm headed to Ecuador for a three week vacation with unknown and/or
> unlikely Internet access, I have created a git repo and posted the source
> (kramdown) and rendered xml, txt, html versions for both the protocol and
> usage documents at https://github.com/kurta/arc-docs
>

Thanks, I'll take a run at it soon, especially during Chicago.


> Also as discussed in the interop, I did not add any additional
> requirements in ARC regarding key lengths. I will be submitting an update
> to the DKIM spec itself to fork both the key length and signing algorithms
> into a registry which can then be managed without requiring further spec
> updates.


There's already registries for DKIM key types and hash algorithms, so no
need to create any:
https://www.iana.org/assignments/dkim-parameters/dkim-parameters.xhtml

I'm not sure how you could go about registering key lengths.  What do you
have in mind?

-MSK

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email