Re: [dmarc-ietf] From: rewriting, was Email standard revision

John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Mon, 02 December 2019 17:11 UTC

Return-Path: <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E3B812081B for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 09:11:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2FLxnZJ-GAaS for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 09:11:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bsa2.jck.com (bsa2.jck.com [70.88.254.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7372120817 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 09:11:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [198.252.137.10] (helo=PSB) by bsa2.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <john-ietf@jck.com>) id 1ibpEn-0000Ex-E3; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 12:11:53 -0500
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2019 12:11:47 -0500
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com>, "Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com>
cc: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>, dmarc-ietf <dmarc@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <457C81343E3DB1B1D58910E4@PSB>
In-Reply-To: <9dc4e992-db54-a9b9-edca-629e3285a1a7@gmail.com>
References: <458060E1B9558124988A46B7@PSB> <f741b82b-3314-47e1-b0cf-ab491ffa14a6@www.fastmail.com> <2E5DE6BD20354824E99E564F@PSB> <84F1134E-5031-46BB-8C78-9E76FF971100@episteme.net> <A39990063436871E76405B96@JcK-HP5.jck.com> <79130263-06d5-6a63-e6c6-81b67695eb48@tana.it> <b18f3646-8733-f921-4e38-33543aef489f@gmail.com> <CABuGu1r6DVaK4uFgw_BTwpFAd3kN1G4fjPRw7JLCTAve=aRb5g@mail.gmail.com> <9dc4e992-db54-a9b9-edca-629e3285a1a7@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 198.252.137.10
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: john-ietf@jck.com
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on bsa2.jck.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/33uQUlEcfbVv3vFNZNK7ffOAPS4>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] From: rewriting, was Email standard revision
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2019 17:11:58 -0000

--On Monday, December 2, 2019 08:29 -0800 Dave Crocker
<dcrocker@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 12/2/2019 7:56 AM, Kurt Andersen (b) wrote:
>> There's also already RFC7960 which expands upon 5598 with
>> specific  reference to DMARC's impact.
> 
> ahh. thanks.
> 
> It will help to have folk comment on the IETF mailing list, so
> that Klensin's comments don't just get responses from me.

Unfortunately, 7960 does not explicitly update 5598, so that
relationship is difficult for anyone not heavily involved to
discover (that neither Dave nor I was aware of the relationship
is probably symptomatic).  This may eventually call for an
update that replaces both documents or may further justify a
more or less comprehensive Applicability Statement for the core
email protocols.  Given that neither is Standards Track, it is
not clear what aspects of them require incorporation into
5321bis and/or 5322bis.  If we are going to open the latter
documents, I look forward to that discussion at the appropriate
time.

   john