[dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd

Craig Schwartz <craig@ftld.com> Wed, 04 September 2019 14:02 UTC

Return-Path: <craig@ftld.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF91D120100 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 07:02:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ftld.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T62Od2LKBUXz for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 07:02:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2a.google.com (mail-io1-xd2a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2BD21200F4 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 07:02:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2a.google.com with SMTP id b136so20304250iof.3 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 04 Sep 2019 07:02:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ftld.com; s=google; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=UtD/fJvznqa20ldqMAvvsuT7Wb+wygJm+PGSE/rLwWA=; b=Z20mFYP/hL5yp4oJOSdSJfAj8rxidQlVB9huEbK1puB3AdlznULPA1+9FvkvevewpU U5RnjiLvgzw9/WVMI7sFahdFba2FOHMhKj3YhPe9Wxe8vB4tUM5xQacHOZdcGTPumYiv AqJ1FpyQfWKxXHnzsUTGMtrj9rJKefOWYXB34=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=UtD/fJvznqa20ldqMAvvsuT7Wb+wygJm+PGSE/rLwWA=; b=gsNPhzjeQq4QqOBRbRdgta3a9O7V8P6EL1G/WJ2oxk7xU1bFOnG5omsNcKH5tOsrIv DpHYEPnhWz/HF9RzFuYBy7RrqTkFUYWyPD6ChYTvIQ81/8kTODTiG2ykuqm3FqiqPcWc v8NdWFiFygfC8JsYViKKPL2Wto97n075QNOa1q07hqGSbeCQ3/kN+cjl/qJ8dY68vtnf EOoZFVhwb0jGp4K6+Jr1oGgqLSzkWvFT7AXrcRrOvWC9PzRB0kLEwk2jP3m1LQdh74X8 NxMK5erqKDywwvcVEDc4rGl5ZA1l2ON3J/RhdEgtY9h0SZcVkuC8Y5ICrOVMG3Mqm19R 2w+w==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWiVopvTILtgMdIF7bIfWTq5LGxmw5HrmkGOSCdwSHqcA68Moc0 yz3ImkPAGRWjANcNewvaMDF+HQFr+u07q9EvZuKTOnatfX8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwnniyoZnl9CvLzG2LX35hmXhMGMn7wGnbWuHPNe77/o6SRWAhgtwfU/PnDx2xamspnSkcg5unlfoSw5U8kR3s=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:683:: with SMTP id 125mr31217091jav.132.1567605744562; Wed, 04 Sep 2019 07:02:24 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Craig Schwartz <craig@ftld.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2019 10:02:02 -0400
Message-ID: <CAJ+U=1oEgQHmCGXMuocsxhz0OuPfs=4NS1WVcMCeVJU9OQgOpQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000008e08590591baa77d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/3Z0A6O1ZCIxxus0N4QDSMubu9Fs>
Subject: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2019 14:02:28 -0000

Murray,



Thanks for the thorough summary of where this work stands and the
constructive feedback to Dave Crocker’s comment on 14 August 2019 (see
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/ESSp7DJ_Ij0tCzAvJws-b4lLurg).



I previously commented on this work on 15 July 2019 (see
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/sw50iND6rZqbEEm16rFDKFsgERU)
and voiced support for the technical solution outlined in the Internet
Draft so will not repeat it again here as it’s not changed.



On behalf of fTLD, our internal DMARC Working Group and the thousands of
registrants in the .BANK and .INSURANCE TLDs, I support the continuation of
this work.



Craig Schwartz
Managing Director
fTLD Registry Services | .BANK & .INSURANCE