[dmarc-ietf] Ticket #60 - definition of NP

Douglas Foster <dougfoster.emailstandards@gmail.com> Thu, 29 April 2021 16:22 UTC

Return-Path: <dougfoster.emailstandards@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB9EC3A41D7 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 09:22:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oXIEnZYUZ8Jh for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 09:22:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-x32d.google.com (mail-ot1-x32d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DFC63A41D4 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 09:22:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-x32d.google.com with SMTP id 92-20020a9d02e50000b029028fcc3d2c9eso39372594otl.0 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 09:22:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=tRCrAFRTp6KrTAHCYkuZW/xW0hN/y3+psbQBeIjnbvc=; b=q1r5QywqOYnvg/JQEPKmK4oR2ldXcwB+69MAgpS6iZbjHhKRDABNwrXRLCc5uB7ctn nafxPBMR65aFOMjXLjdlxYnTC73k7hZkY41Q1A6WRC/z76KDB9904JF5QAWocHRF7bDy 2Vx8zyN4sAZs2gAYUisMwpFEuQ1UEfjDbLT2a9stDx3HOdyQoddOg8K+W6xEpvLtVvi7 uI0HAotla+iLogAJvH42HGteLYNKZfNxtLyLXOoxrvSwhPybe40UvmjNa91ny9JuibBp 6z7EmG4x5OOodzAVyaR5vdiIWTNMC+YaAs6PFaxaSJnel2TEccCbu8FpWRBZMIE9zkIf Yscw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=tRCrAFRTp6KrTAHCYkuZW/xW0hN/y3+psbQBeIjnbvc=; b=QZqQGSEgWMARniYPxZ+MRJAQZFi0O7q9+stxRLVdOb7U1AZeKMpTgXBdmQ0lql6ATe lkDC+OOeaYAnHLzv/B15fxrHBV6Z/QfB92vAUiR/Z769O1THdnd2GkB5kbuzno8AmnOm 6NMt3EEHtAQ0qQe7N2Y81wU4Bd+BrSOSj2p6y3I7UuMsfjTOM0o7tZGhsb2GqMmX4Hhx RtssoLtOIYXTrAbU+eHqkhVEeJb6lMGkbwCZi8hnG95lFNQmcg2E2vd/6Wu6dsLYywKK ynOkxlNaTfLOuBvZwmoDQn2Vtat0hCjd3A2jQFSddE3G2wQYiW224FYS6t+yfvyY2+1x yDjQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530JEflCb6vKg4hBiHMpZt7pTcxo12cZyF9OhGxZAsAMl+fdadc3 dOBFkQ1QLqu9dwg6UJ5EpW9nDBob82z0em+++x5TLOgA
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwueQszGPfgcKgh7Zvcy3e/jmwjGxPCqLwntAS8ufdFIS4AggEGgwQgvfRxNJrJf7zvI/z7pSpfd1owdUfDTBo=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:30b:: with SMTP id 11mr165050otv.298.1619713372434; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 09:22:52 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Douglas Foster <dougfoster.emailstandards@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 12:22:42 -0400
Message-ID: <CAH48Zfw7KDKbaV7Z6psPRTsrrVsKxCWbw1yKNSJVdf5+sgXbUA@mail.gmail.com>
To: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000033b2d505c11ee834"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/3_hyvqFwxLwqDYk5LHC-28bN_uw>
Subject: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #60 - definition of NP
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 16:22:56 -0000

There is much to like about the new document.   Thank you to the design
team for your good work.

For the NP policy, the MX/A/AAA test lacks the precise definition that I
would expect to be required for a standards-track document.   Does another
document have language that we can use or reference?

Additionally, it needs language to explain why this is the appropriate test
for separating between the SP policy and the NP policy.