Re: [dmarc-ietf] rua XML update needed for treewalk
John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Wed, 22 June 2022 15:13 UTC
Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAC3DC14CF15 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 08:13:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.86
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.86 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=Mk6bmAZW; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=I2SD0mWC
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0SGNPftarPMl for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 08:13:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF882C14F727 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 08:13:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 93809 invoked from network); 22 Jun 2022 15:13:35 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=16e6f.62b3319f.k2206; bh=RC83NGg7HylIJ2L6Myz0M9BGmk4TRLDfwvop1uC4xCE=; b=Mk6bmAZWT/3hgaXTWS2BTNjM1Jyc48W81gDiYFMRg1cKHQvwTY1zOuav7FRnyoP4n6xGwKpvp1heHx8SH0mqWb65x6XRxQ/Nz4G8fdCSAsYSddmKNcXtnYbAdQFr7eJGrDqvxhPpkyrvibcdZkt3jbbRMAz3zuY49YA6m5Hfq8v7b9VIy/p8Zv5WEgocQS5Vl89atjbiETfV947lKHhhCnGYFWkzR63MhSq32Vl+Vb9WAE6h4RY35dyeAnWHP3eH9PMIeX7Lg9JGBg06rpi+MBh8bePJ29/qcEbZjOqDfqMAU860JkpdTlf1FFwrb7guJ33aYCrmEtyfLQpHzdJnGg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=16e6f.62b3319f.k2206; bh=RC83NGg7HylIJ2L6Myz0M9BGmk4TRLDfwvop1uC4xCE=; b=I2SD0mWCBBT9RM0yRltzZTCf1OoGOPwVwmumhkquIZ5zgoKcUIvSUKJ5FJC28L7NcWSMyyh+z003zyx7Tv2XCKzzfjmjK/BOY5Wmom0dFyFKPW6FXtdIuuU7VAyvbocaLM66dXhyVNhZ3/nPy4qs0OXoGQ/MHSzedJSvs9fp9fSd1rDqyDTNi+4EQnCC56nAaSDMR2iWd+NOVWJlUEkrp/HVcz4fAnEfW++O6j72c6HNqxUp9qQnMupMJFKGW4sMKYfWsoJ4nDJ7PJ1xbYhgnM5DV7lDmrj+PJtGECYMpgzuXPfEfxpJspUhLM2V2fekW+FJhwuL917HWPSpdl772g==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.3 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 22 Jun 2022 15:13:35 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id 0AB3444195C7; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 11:13:34 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 11:13:34 -0400
Message-Id: <20220622151335.0AB3444195C7@ary.qy>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Cc: tomki.camp@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <CAM0urBr79TU+u9XQEECwbenUN0pBdVjVO3tr9as1EX5qo3Kx8Q@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Cleverness: minimal
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/3cOp2ghhez_YUlZTMBxPRCYGIf8>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] rua XML update needed for treewalk
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 15:13:41 -0000
It appears that Tomki Camp <tomki.camp@gmail.com> said: >If DMARC evaluation at receivers is updated to allow determination of >alignment via tree walk, the XML reporting data sent using that scheme >needs to reflect this. I don't see why. The current text says you go find a PSL-like thing and use that to guess an org domain. The PSL that everyone uses changes several times per week and there is no guarantee that the one that a reporter used matches the one that the recipient has. Aggregate reports say what domain they're reporting on, which means that it includes all of its subdomains unless there happen to be lower level entries in the PSL the reporter used in which case it might not. What do you think will be different? Why would it matter? R's, John