Re: [dmarc-ietf] Eliot's review of the DMARC spec
"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Fri, 05 July 2013 18:52 UTC
Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2A4221F9FD5 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Jul 2013 11:52:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.78
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.78 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.419, BAYES_00=-2.599, HABEAS_ACCREDITED_SOI=-4.3, RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED=-4.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8J5QotvyI5jc for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Jul 2013 11:52:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from leila.iecc.com (leila6.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:4c:6569:6c61]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B12721F9FD1 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Jul 2013 11:52:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 69449 invoked from network); 5 Jul 2013 18:52:42 -0000
Received: from leila.iecc.com (64.57.183.34) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 5 Jul 2013 18:52:42 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=51d715fa.xn--btvx9d.k1307; i=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=qWGEYjTkpPMGboKo0iByXlc8gWlzxkzs4GNRJXYx3tA=; b=CO021VP7We4v1IBHDRDxgV2sQYFGRVwFyUp2VOans4qN059xWM9B/9iaKbOYAHn4N2f9H+sQXznBQ1g4gzAfLW8MK60unyExE74z716bFSo6yX2MaTmOvkOHvSSD6KbdgWcYN18ysRgYkd1v3uOYv0h+W5V5dg8UFaHtyMZCoczLGRukfffL5CYG6Q40nTwcUQD2oO2HWWKZfyC2FRdLEsldD8nHrSfSu3ywtsHH3sNDcvnGLEJZeoUtnaNWLrhQ
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=51d715fa.xn--btvx9d.k1307; olt=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=qWGEYjTkpPMGboKo0iByXlc8gWlzxkzs4GNRJXYx3tA=; b=XcvH1BIPmFUgP41HjLO2CHi+aYI2ErlKBwgGYyp6RoU0dTYL5iaHvvHCzpCW3xixSV/ADf+gfLELL3IMclaL32zTaAk3UEozaDOEIvjBaxmI8xBxI+PsdPfMRLtzCxKeOASYABVtvj79xpecW9Wvzy12Uic3yTZgBBmhTLnLIjdgJ7QsYfjrPDdTlLq2MUe0ASkDuvoel9BNlwT9NrUfJP5A7Jq79O+H4rHnI/hcnLMkiEpSJlTiZvPKE9OsCkBw
Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2013 18:52:20 -0000
Message-ID: <20130705185220.28629.qmail@joyce.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwZfEadbB+piza=w8Z=78Y-XicSQ1BXyRz=iNr_XcTK8-g@mail.gmail.com>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Cc: superuser@gmail.com, lear@cisco.com
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Eliot's review of the DMARC spec
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dmarc>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2013 18:52:48 -0000
>> I've been asked to take a look at the DMARC spec. Your original note with the comments never made it to the DMARC list (I checked the archives.) Could someone send it along so we don't have to reverse engineer it from the meta-comments? Tnx.
- [dmarc-ietf] Fwd: Eliot's review of the DMARC spec Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Fwd: Eliot's review of the DMARC… SM
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Fwd: Eliot's review of the DMARC… John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Eliot's review of the DMARC spec Tim Draegen
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Fwd: Eliot's review of the DMARC… Matt Simerson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Fwd: Eliot's review of the DMARC… John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Eliot's review of the DMARC spec Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Fwd: Eliot's review of the DMARC… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Eliot's review of the DMARC spec Eliot Lear
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Eliot's review of the DMARC spec John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Eliot's review of the DMARC spec Murray S. Kucherawy
- [dmarc-ietf] Review of draft-kucherawy-dmarc-base… SM
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Eliot's review of the DMARC spec John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Review of draft-kucherawy-dmarc-… Franck Martin
- [dmarc-ietf] cousin domain definition (was Re: Fw… Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Review of draft-kucherawy-dmarc-… SM
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] cousin domain definition (was Re… Matt Simerson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] cousin domain definition (was Re… Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] cousin domain definition (was Re… Elizabeth Zwicky
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] cousin domain definition (was Re… Matt Simerson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Review of draft-kucherawy-dmarc-… Franck Martin
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] cousin domain definition (was Re… Franck Martin
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] cousin domain definition (was Re… Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] cousin domain definition (was Re… John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] cousin domain definition (was Re… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Review of draft-kucherawy-dmarc-… SM
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Review of draft-kucherawy-dmarc-… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] cousin domain definition (was Re… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] cousin domain definition (was Re… Matt Simerson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] cousin domain definition (was Re… Matt Simerson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] cousin domain definition (was Re… Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] cousin domain definition (was Re… MH Michael Hammer (5304)
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] cousin domain definition (was Re… Steve Jones
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] cousin domain definition (was Re… Barry Leiba
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] cousin domain definition (was Re… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] cousin domain definition (was Re… Steve Jones
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] cousin domain definition (was Re… Matt Simerson