Re: [dmarc-ietf] Eliot's review of the DMARC spec

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Fri, 05 July 2013 18:52 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2A4221F9FD5 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Jul 2013 11:52:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.78
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.78 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.419, BAYES_00=-2.599, HABEAS_ACCREDITED_SOI=-4.3, RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED=-4.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8J5QotvyI5jc for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Jul 2013 11:52:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from leila.iecc.com (leila6.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:4c:6569:6c61]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B12721F9FD1 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Jul 2013 11:52:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 69449 invoked from network); 5 Jul 2013 18:52:42 -0000
Received: from leila.iecc.com (64.57.183.34) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 5 Jul 2013 18:52:42 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=51d715fa.xn--btvx9d.k1307; i=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=qWGEYjTkpPMGboKo0iByXlc8gWlzxkzs4GNRJXYx3tA=; b=CO021VP7We4v1IBHDRDxgV2sQYFGRVwFyUp2VOans4qN059xWM9B/9iaKbOYAHn4N2f9H+sQXznBQ1g4gzAfLW8MK60unyExE74z716bFSo6yX2MaTmOvkOHvSSD6KbdgWcYN18ysRgYkd1v3uOYv0h+W5V5dg8UFaHtyMZCoczLGRukfffL5CYG6Q40nTwcUQD2oO2HWWKZfyC2FRdLEsldD8nHrSfSu3ywtsHH3sNDcvnGLEJZeoUtnaNWLrhQ
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=51d715fa.xn--btvx9d.k1307; olt=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=qWGEYjTkpPMGboKo0iByXlc8gWlzxkzs4GNRJXYx3tA=; b=XcvH1BIPmFUgP41HjLO2CHi+aYI2ErlKBwgGYyp6RoU0dTYL5iaHvvHCzpCW3xixSV/ADf+gfLELL3IMclaL32zTaAk3UEozaDOEIvjBaxmI8xBxI+PsdPfMRLtzCxKeOASYABVtvj79xpecW9Wvzy12Uic3yTZgBBmhTLnLIjdgJ7QsYfjrPDdTlLq2MUe0ASkDuvoel9BNlwT9NrUfJP5A7Jq79O+H4rHnI/hcnLMkiEpSJlTiZvPKE9OsCkBw
Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2013 18:52:20 -0000
Message-ID: <20130705185220.28629.qmail@joyce.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwZfEadbB+piza=w8Z=78Y-XicSQ1BXyRz=iNr_XcTK8-g@mail.gmail.com>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Cc: superuser@gmail.com, lear@cisco.com
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Eliot's review of the DMARC spec
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dmarc>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2013 18:52:48 -0000

>>  I've been asked to take a look at the DMARC spec.

Your original note with the comments never made it to the DMARC list
(I checked the archives.)  Could someone send it along so we don't
have to reverse engineer it from the meta-comments?

Tnx.