IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Two new fields in aggregate reports

Chris Wedgwood <cw@f00f.org> Fri, 25 October 2019 17:59 UTC

Return-Path: <cw@f00f.org>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D4141209A9 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 10:59:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.301
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.301 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=f00f.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sdzff02IA1lO for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 10:59:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from proxima.stupidest.org (proxima.stupidest.org [35.163.12.83]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18406120A06 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 10:59:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aether.stupidest.org (tunnel-proxima-aether.stupidest.org [10.0.1.5]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by proxima.stupidest.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 470BhG0Yw5zM5; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 17:59:26 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=f00f.org; s=m2016a; t=1572026366; bh=Ibe2RqfYjNPFoMKq6cLYkvfgEqx6FLjJRsbO24zxtbo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To; b=TtGAlpEqYfkm2XkyO85aN21zvK4AGcZqzdNCdjx1CosuMCgBVwoNTMyBxsgM/Zh54 qjeFc23+KVLgSPyUXzGenuh+azknIPxLxZgUXc4WhPneYkSmplavq9/j59CSw7ME5Z XsUDyZumn9XfPEiTO8+Fi78+JvKsHWbNo1MJrHaACmKFzPWfAe4TstI7Snu9yruHQW 2YFHaUfcy7dBtwJPyET+1AB21qK+YXhzNFXIEjiuPAafYpVOsJ+3RHZAHzNzrbmP9V +vMMuwgsAeyoJkblzt8YqAdY5XI8y4xtaXssA1ACymeXPOvg93yE1do0VLYXJHOGYO JhGVxcWMW+l9w==
Received: by aether.stupidest.org (Postfix, from userid 10000) id 470BhF5PNLz9KQZw; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 10:59:25 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 10:59:25 -0700
From: Chris Wedgwood <cw@f00f.org>
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Cc: dmarc@ietf.org, dilyan.palauzov@aegee.org
Message-ID: <20191025175925.GA15322@aether.stupidest.org>
References: <e5bc55efd6ef01ab849505a0872c9dc9a36e738f.camel@aegee.org> <20191025174918.E8CAFD66F4D@ary.qy>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20191025174918.E8CAFD66F4D@ary.qy>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/3y7rVmQ0btv3yo2PLDvG-JZvbck>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Two new fields in aggregate reports
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 17:59:33 -0000

> I can't see how spam scores would be of any use for any of these
> tasks.

i don't think anyone will include those values even if they can/could
for fear of it being used against them

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email